Dataset Information

Evaluation of anemia management by algorithms in patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Anemia commonly develops in patients with chronic kidney disease and is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. There are currently no published studies evaluating the efficacy of a nurse-driven anemia-management protocol for patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of an anemia-management protocol in terms of achieving hemoglobin and transferrin saturation levels within the target range, as well as associated utilization of medications, relative to individualized dosing of medications by nephrologists.

Methods

An algorithm for nurse-driven management of anemia was introduced in April 2009 at a kidney function clinic in a large urban centre. The charts of patients with chronic kidney disease who were not undergoing dialysis were reviewed before (July to December 2007) and after (July to December 2009) implementation of the protocol. Patients' data for hemoglobin, transferrin saturation, and doses of iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents were collected for each of the 6-month study periods.

Results

In total, 390 patients were treated for anemia before and 434 patients after introduction of the protocol. The anemia-management protocol was non-inferior to individualized dosing for maintenance of hemoglobin levels within the target range of 110-120 g/L: percentage of measured levels within target range 33.3% (485/1456) before versus 34.2% (504/1472) after (absolute difference 0.9 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to 4.4). The criteria for non-inferiority were not met for maintenance of transferrin saturation within the target range of 22%-50%: percentage of levels within target range 58.8% (374/636) before versus 56.9% (403/708) after (absolute difference 1.9 percentage points, 95% CI -3.4 to 7.2). There were no statistically significant differences in mean doses of epoetin alfa, darbepoetin, or iron before and after introduction of the protocol. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in number of dose changes for epoetin alfa, darbepoetin, or iron.

Conclusion

The nurse-driven anemia-management protocol was non-inferior to dosing by nephrologists in terms of managing hemoglobin levels. It would be reasonable to use an anemia-management protocol for patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

SUBMITTER: Rogers J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3093421 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of anemia management by algorithms in patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

Rogers Jenelle J Leung Marianna M Beaulieu Monica M Levin Adeera A Burnett Shelley S Zienkiewicz Anita A

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy 20110301 2

<h4>Background</h4>Anemia commonly develops in patients with chronic kidney disease and is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. There are currently no published studies evaluating the efficacy of a nurse-driven anemia-management protocol for patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the efficacy of an anemia-management protocol in terms of achieving hemoglobin and transferrin saturation levels within the target range, as wel ...[more]

PMID: 22479043

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2013 guidelines and the Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2016 guidelines recommend statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in CKD patients aged 50 years or older who are not receiving treatment with kidney transplant or dialysis.ObjectivesTo evaluate statin use for patients in the Vancouver General Hospital Kidney Care Clinic (VGH KCC) and to gain insight into the KCC nephrologists' practices and perspectives regarding the prescribing of statins for patients with CKD.MethodsThe study comprised 2 parts. Part 1 consisted of a cross-sectional study of all statin-eligible patients in the VGH KCC followed by a retrospective chart review. In the chart review, data were collected for 250 statin users and 250 non-users. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine associations between demographic variables and statin use or non-use. Part 2 was an electronic survey of VGH KCC nephrologists.ResultsOf the 813 statin-eligible patients, 512 (63%) were taking a statin. Patients were approximately 5 times more likely to be receiving statin therapy when it was indicated for secondary versus primary prevention (adjusted odds ratio 4.64, 95% confidence interval 2.95-7.47). Eight of the 9 KCC nephrologists completed the survey, and 7 (87.5%) of these respondents indicated that they never or rarely prescribed statins themselves to KCC patients for primary prevention. However, the same number reported that they sometimes or often suggested statin initiation to family physicians. Three of the respondents indicated agreement with guideline recommendations, but many stated that the decision for statin initiation should be individualized to the patient. Strategies to improve statin prescribing rates that were endorsed by respondents included educating family physicians, creating preprinted orders and laboratory requisitions for statin initiation, providing educational materials about statins to patients, and implementing a protocol for KCC pharmacists to counsel patients about statins.ConclusionsMany statin-eligible VGH KCC patients were not receiving statin therapy, and most of the KCC nephrologists considered statin prescribing as a role for family physicians. Within the KCC, future directions will be to develop a standardized approach to identify patients who would benefit from statin therapy, and to implement strategies to improve statin prescribing rates in appropriate patients.

Project description:IntroductionPeople with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis (CKD G5D) have an increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes and a high incidence of major surgery. Despite the high burden of these combined risks, there is a paucity of evidence to support tailored perioperative strategies to manage this population. A comprehensive evidence synthesis would inform the management of these patients in the perioperative period and identify knowledge gaps. We describe a protocol for a scoping review of the literature to identify existing perioperative strategies, protocols, pathways and interventions for people with CKD G5D undergoing major surgery.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a scoping review in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and report per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. In February 2020, we will complete our search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry for published literature from inception to present. All study types are eligible for inclusion, without language restriction. Studies reporting a perioperative intervention in adult patients with CKD G5D are eligible for inclusion. Studies in prevalent kidney transplant patients or patients with acute kidney injury, and studies that report on surgical approaches without consideration of perioperative management strategies, will be excluded. Reviewers will independently assess abstracts for all identified studies in duplicate, and again at the full-text stage. Following published literature searches, a search of the grey literature will be developed. We will extract and narratively report study, participant and intervention details. This will include a summary table outlining the strategies employed, organised into post hoc developed perioperative domains.Ethics and disseminationEthical considerations do not apply to this scoping review. Findings will be disseminated through relevant conference presentations and publications.

Project description:Fractures across the stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) could be due to osteoporosis, some form of renal osteodystrophy defined by specific quantitative histomorphometry or chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). CKD-MBD is a systemic disease that links disorders of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD to either one or all of the following: abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone or vitamin D metabolism; abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth or strength; or vascular or other soft-tissue calcification. Osteoporosis, as defined by The National Institutes of Health, may coexist with renal osteodystrophy or CKD-MBD. Differentiation among these disorders is required to manage correctly the correct disorder to reduce the risk of fractures. While the World Health Organization (WHO) BMD criteria for osteoporosis can be used in patients with stages 1-3 CKD, the disorders of bone turnover become so aberrant by stages 4 and 5 CKD that neither the WHO criteria nor the occurrence of a fragility fracture can be used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. The diagnosis of osteoporosis in stages 4 and 5 CKD is one of the exclusion-excluding either renal osteodystrophy or CKD-MBD as the cause of low BMD or fragility fractures. Differentiations among the disorders of renal osteodystrophy, CKD-MBD or osteoporosis are dependent on the measurement of specific biochemical markers, including serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and/or quantitative bone histomorphometry. Management of fractures in stages 1-3 CKD does not differ in persons with or without CKD with osteoporosis assuming there is no evidence for CKD-MBD, clinically suspected by elevated PTH, hyperphosphatemia or fibroblast growth factor 23 due to CKD. Treatment of fractures in persons with osteoporosis and stages 4 and 5 CKD is not evidence based, with the exception of post hoc analysis suggesting efficacy and safety of specific osteoporosis therapies (alendronate, risedronate and denosumab) in stage 4 CKD. This review also discusses how to diagnose and manage fragility fractures across the five stages of CKD.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of anemia management by algorithms in patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Evaluation of anemia management by algorithms in patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets