Phase 1 randomized trial of the vaginal safety and acceptability of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) in sexually active young women (MTN-004).
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: The study was designed to assess the safety, adherence, acceptability, and effect on vaginal microflora of 3% SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel), a novel dendrimer topical microbicide that inhibits HIV, herpes simplex virus-2, and human papillomavirus in vitro and in animal models.Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on sexually active women.Sixty-one sexually active women aged 18-24 years were recruited from three sites in the United States. Participants were randomized 1: 1: 1 to receive VivaGel, VivaGel placebo, or a hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) placebo twice daily for 14 consecutive days. Safety endpoints included genitourinary and/or other adverse events. Changes in vaginal flora were determined from Gram-stained vaginal smears and quantitative vaginal culture.No serious adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events were reported. Genitourinary symptoms were reported as follows: VivaGel (n = 17/22; 77.3%), VivaGel placebo (n = 14/21; 66.7%), and HEC (n = eight of 18; 44.4%; not significant, P = 0.1). The incidence of abnormal pelvic examination findings was similar across all gel arms of the study. Using pairwise comparison, women in the VivaGel arm had a significantly higher incidence of related genitourinary adverse events compared with women in the HEC gel arm (0.297 versus 0.111 per 100 person-years, respectively; P = 0.003). Exposure to VivaGel and VivaGel placebo resulted in minor shifts in the vaginal microflora, but there was no overall impact on incidence of bacterial vaginosis as assessed by Nugent score.VivaGel was generally well tolerated and comparable with the VivaGel placebo, although there was a higher incidence of low-grade related genital adverse events compared to the HEC placebo gel.
<h4>Objectives</h4>The study was designed to assess the safety, adherence, acceptability, and effect on vaginal microflora of 3% SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel), a novel dendrimer topical microbicide that inhibits HIV, herpes simplex virus-2, and human papillomavirus in vitro and in animal models.<h4>Design</h4>Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on sexually active women.<h4>Methods</h4>Sixty-one sexually active women aged 18-24 years were recruited from three sites in the United S ...[more]
Project description:Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disproportionately affects men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). Safe and acceptable topical HIV prevention methods that target the rectum are needed.MTN-017 was a phase 2, 3-period, randomized sequence, open-label, expanded safety and acceptability crossover study comparing rectally applied reduced-glycerin (RG) 1% tenofovir (TFV) and oral emtricitabine/TFV disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF). In each 8-week study period participants were randomized to RG-TFV rectal gel daily, or RG-TFV rectal gel before and after receptive anal intercourse (RAI; or at least twice weekly in the event of no RAI), or daily oral FTC/TDF.MSM and TGW (n = 195) were enrolled from 8 sites in the United States, Thailand, Peru, and South Africa with mean age of 31.1 years (range 18-64). There were no differences in ?grade 2 adverse event rates between daily gel (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.09; P = .59) or RAI gel (IRR, 0.90; P = .51) compared to FTC/TDF. High adherence (?80% of prescribed doses assessed by unused product return and Short Message System reports) was less likely in the daily gel regimen (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; P < .001), and participants reported less likelihood of future daily gel use for HIV protection compared to FTC/TDF (OR, 0.38; P < .001).Rectal application of RG TFV gel was safe in MSM and TGW. Adherence and product use likelihood were similar for the intermittent gel and daily oral FTC/TDF regimens, but lower for the daily gel regimen.NCT01687218.
Project description:OBJECTIVESThe purpose of Project Gel was to determine the safety and acceptability of rectal microbicides in young men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) at risk of HIV infection.METHODSMSM and TGW aged 18-30 years were enrolled at three sites; Pittsburgh, PA; Boston, MA; and San Juan, PR. Stage 1A was a cross-sectional assessment of sexual health and behavior in MSM and TGW. A subset of participants from Stage 1A were then enrolled in Stage 1B, a 12-week evaluation of the safety and acceptability of a placebo rectal gel. This was followed by the final phase of the study (Stage 2) in which a subset of participants from Stage 1B were enrolled into a Phase 1 rectal safety and acceptability evaluation of tenofovir (TFV) 1% gel.RESULTS248 participants were enrolled into Stage 1A. Participants' average age was 23.3 years. The most common sexually transmitted infection (STIs) at baseline were Herpes simplex (HSV)-2 (16.1% by serology) and rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) (10.1% by NAAT). 134 participants were enrolled into Stage 1B. During the 12 week period of follow-up 2 HIV, 5 rectal CT, and 5 rectal Neisseria gonorrhea infections were detected. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were infections (N = 56) or gastrointestinal (N = 46) and were mild (69.6%) or moderate (28.0%). Of the participants who completed Stage 1B, 24 were enrolled into Stage 2 and randomized (1:1) to receive TFV or placebo gel. All participants completed Stage 2. The majority of AEs were gastrointestinal (N = 10) and of mild (87.2%) or moderate (10.3%) severity.CONCLUSIONSIn this study we were able to enroll a sexually active population of young MSM and TGW who were willing to use rectal microbicides. TFV gel was safe and acceptable and should be further developed as an alternative HIV prevention intervention for this population.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT01283360.
Project description:ObjectiveRectal microbicides are needed to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition associated with unprotected receptive anal intercourse. The MTN-007 study was designed to assess the safety (general and mucosal), adherence, and acceptability of a new reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel.MethodsParticipants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive the reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel, a hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel, a 2% nonoxynol-9 gel, or no treatment. Each gel was administered as a single dose followed by 7 daily doses. Mucosal safety evaluation included histology, fecal calprotectin, epithelial sloughing, cytokine expression (mRNA and protein), microarrays, flow cytometry of mucosal T cell phenotype, and rectal microflora. Acceptability and adherence were determined by computer-administered questionnaires and interactive telephone response, respectively.ResultsSixty-five participants (45 men and 20 women) were recruited into the study. There were no significant differences between the numbers of ? Grade 2 adverse events across the arms of the study. Likelihood of future product use (acceptability) was 87% (reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel), 93% (hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel), and 63% (nonoxynol-9 gel). Fecal calprotectin, rectal microflora, and epithelial sloughing did not differ by treatment arms during the study. Suggestive evidence of differences was seen in histology, mucosal gene expression, protein expression, and T cell phenotype. These changes were mostly confined to comparisons between the nonoxynol-9 gel and other study arms.ConclusionsThe reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel was safe and well tolerated rectally and should be advanced to Phase 2 development.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01232803.
Project description:To assess the acceptability of sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing using self-collected vaginal swabs (SCVS) among college women.First-year female students (N=483).Participants were offered free testing for 3 STIs using SCVS in April 2010 and later completed a survey regarding their testing decision and experiences.Sixty-four percent (n=310) accepted testing; of these, 98% found it easy or very easy to understand the SCVS instructions, and 93% found it easy or very easy to collect the specimen. Among the 36% who did not participate in testing, most had scheduling conflicts or did not perceive a risk for STIs; only 26% felt uncomfortable about the SCVS procedure. Among all women, SCVS was preferred over other STI testing methods.STI testing using SCVS was acceptable to the majority of college women and could increase the uptake of testing among sexually active college women.
Project description:BACKGROUND:Few studies of microbicide acceptability among HIV-infected women have been done. We assessed Carraguard® vaginal gel acceptability among participants in a randomized, controlled, crossover safety trial in HIV-infected women in Thailand. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Participants used each of 3 treatments (Carraguard gel, methylcellulose placebo gel, and no product) for 7 days, were randomized to one of six treatment sequences, and were blinded to the type of gel they received in the two gel-use periods. After both gel-use periods, acceptability was assessed by face-to-face interview. Responses were compared to those of women participating in two previous Carraguard safety studies at the same study site. Sixty women enrolled with a median age of 34 years; 25% were sexually active. Self-reported adherence (98%) and overall satisfaction rating of the gels (87% liked "somewhat" or "very much") were high, and most (77%) considered the volume of gel "just right." For most characteristics, crossover trial participants evaluated the gels more favorably than women in the other two trials, but there were few differences in the desired characteristics of a hypothetical microbicide. Almost half (48%) of crossover trial participants noticed a difference between Carraguard and placebo gels; 33% preferred Carraguard while 12% preferred placebo (p?=?0.01). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:Daily Carraguard vaginal gel use was highly acceptable in this population of HIV-infected women, who assessed the gels more positively than women in two other trials at the site. This may be attributable to higher perceived need for protection among HIV-infected women, as well as to study design differences. This trial was registered in the U.S. National Institutes of Health clinical trials registry under registration number NCT00213044.
Project description:This study describes the acceptability of a rectal microbicide gel formulation using dapivirine (DPV) among men and women from two countries (United States and Thailand) participating in the Microbicide Trials Network-026 trial. We evaluated participants' acceptability of a rectal DPV/placebo gel as part of a Phase I trial (N = 26; 18 male, 8 female). Participants reported favorable acceptability of the study gel, with most participants reporting that they liked the gel the same (n = 14; 53.8%) or more (n = 11; 42.4%) than when they started the trial. Over half of participants noted that they would prefer the gel over condoms (n = 13; 50%) or that they liked condoms and the gel equally (n = 8; 30.8%). Side effects across products included leakage (n = 8; 30.8%), diarrhea (n = 4; 15.4%), or soiling (n = 1; 3.8%). The high acceptability of a rectal gel underscores its promise as a short-acting biomedical prevention, warranting future research for HIV prevention.Trial Registration: NCT03239483.
Project description:BackgroundOral and vaginal preparations of tenofovir as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have demonstrated variable efficacy in men and women prompting assessment of variation in drug concentration as an explanation. Knowledge of tenofovir concentration and its active form, tenofovir diphosphate, at the putative vaginal and rectal site of action and its relationship to concentrations at multiple other anatomic locations may provide key information for both interpreting PrEP study outcomes and planning future PrEP drug development.ObjectiveMTN-001 was designed to directly compare oral to vaginal steady-state tenofovir pharmacokinetics in blood, vaginal tissue, and vaginal and rectal fluid in a paired cross-over design.Methods and findingsWe enrolled 144 HIV-uninfected women at 4 US and 3 African clinical research sites in an open label, 3-period crossover study of three different daily tenofovir regimens, each for 6 weeks (oral 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, vaginal 1% tenofovir gel [40 mg], or both). Serum concentrations after vaginal dosing were 56-fold lower than after oral dosing (p<0.001). Vaginal tissue tenofovir diphosphate was quantifiable in ?90% of women with vaginal dosing and only 19% of women with oral dosing. Vaginal tissue tenofovir diphosphate was ?130-fold higher with vaginal compared to oral dosing (p<0.001). Rectal fluid tenofovir concentrations in vaginal dosing periods were higher than concentrations measured in the oral only dosing period (p<0.03).ConclusionsCompared to oral dosing, vaginal dosing achieved much lower serum concentrations and much higher vaginal tissue concentrations. Even allowing for 100-fold concentration differences due to poor adherence or less frequent prescribed dosing, vaginal dosing of tenofovir should provide higher active site concentrations and theoretically greater PrEP efficacy than oral dosing; randomized topical dosing PrEP trials to the contrary indicates that factors beyond tenofovir's antiviral effect substantially influence PrEP efficacy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00592124.
Project description:Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, a licensed oral treatment for both HIV and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections, has been associated with severe rebound hepatic flares when treatment is interrupted. A gel formulation of tenofovir is currently being assessed as a microbicide against HIV. If licensed, it is possible that tenofovir gel could be used either intentionally or unintentionally by HBV carriers. The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of tenofovir gel use in this patient group participating in the CAPRISA 004 tenofovir gel trial. HBV infection status was assessed at enrolment and study exit. Liver function testing was performed at enrolment, study months 3, 12, 24, study exit, and 2 months after exiting the study. At enrolment, 34 women were identified as being HBV carriers and 22 women acquired HBV infections during follow-up; 14 and 8 in the tenofovir and placebo gel arms, respectively (p=0.21). Intermittent tenofovir gel use did not cause an increase in hepatic flares or impact on viral load suppression in women with HBV infection. There were 2 hepatic flares in each gel arm during follow-up and none 2months after cessation of gel at study exit. The mean HBV DNA levels were similar at enrolment and exit in both study arms. Tenofovir gel, when used intermittently, was safe to use in women with HBV infection.
Project description:BackgroundCarrageenan demonstrated potent anti-HPV (human papillomavirus) activity in vitro and in animal models. The Carrageenan-gel Against Transmission of Cervical Human papillomavirus trial's interim analysis (n = 277) demonstrated a 36% protective effect of carrageenan against incident HPV infections. Herein, we report the trial's final results.MethodsIn this exploratory phase IIB randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited healthy women aged ≥18 years primarily from health service clinics at two Canadian Universities in Montreal. Participants were randomised (1:1) by the study coordinator (using computer-assisted block randomisation with randomly variable block sizes up to a block size of eight) to a carrageenan-based or placebo gel to be self-applied every other day for the first month and before/after intercourse. Participants, study nurses, and laboratory technicians (HPV testing and genotyping) were blinded to group assignment. At each visit (months 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12), participants provided questionnaire data and a self-collected vaginal sample (tested for 36 HPV types, Linear Array). The primary outcome was type-specific HPV incidence (occurring at any follow-up visit). Intention-to-treat analyses for incidence were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models, including participants with ≥2 visits. Safety analyses included all participants randomised. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN96104919.FindingsBetween Jan 16, 2013 and Sept 30, 2020, 461 participants (enrolled) were randomly assigned to the carrageenan (n = 227) or placebo (n = 234) groups. Incidence and safety analyses included 429 and 461 participants, respectively. We found 51.9% (108/208) of participants in carrageenan and 66.5% (147/221) in placebo arm acquired ≥1 HPV type (hazard ratio 0.63 [95% CI: 0.49-0.81], p = 0.0003). Adverse events were reported by 34.8% (79/227) and 39.7% (93/234) of participants in carrageenan and placebo arm (p = 0.27), respectively.InterpretationConsistent with the interim analysis, use of a carrageenan-based gel compared to placebo resulted in a 37% reduction in risk of incident genital HPV infections in women with no increase in adverse events. A carrageenan-based gel may complement HPV vaccination.FundingCanadian Institutes of Health Research, CarraShield Labs Inc.
Project description:This study was designed to assess the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to rectal administration of tenofovir (TFV) 1% vaginally formulated gel and oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This study was designed as a phase 1, randomized, two-site (United States), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sexually abstinent men and women. Eighteen participants received a single 300-mg exposure of oral TDF and were then randomized 2:1 to receive a single and then seven daily exposures of rectal TFV or hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) placebo gel. Safety endpoints included clinical adverse events (AEs) and mucosal safety parameters. Blood and colonic biopsies were collected for PK analyses and ex vivo HIV-1 challenge. No serious AEs were reported. However, AEs were significantly increased with 7-day TFV gel use, most prominently with gastrointestinal AEs (p=0.002). Only 25% of participants liked the TFV gel. Likelihood of use "if somewhat protective" was ?75% in both groups. Indices of mucosal damage showed minimal changes. Tissue TFV diphosphate (TFV-DP) C(max) 30?min after single rectal exposure was 6-10 times greater than single oral exposure; tissue TFV-DP was 5.7 times greater following 7-day versus single rectal exposure. In vivo exposure correlated with significant ex vivo tissue infectibility suppression [single-rectal: p=0.12, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) p=0.006; 7-day rectal: p=0.02, ANCOVA p=0.005]. Tissue PK-PD was significantly correlated (p=0.002). We conclude that rectal dosing with TFV 1% gel resulted in greater TFV-DP tissue detection than oral dosing with reduced ex vivo biopsy infectibility, enabling PK-PD correlations. On the basis of increased gastrointestinal AEs, rectally applied, vaginally formulated TFV was not entirely safe or acceptable, suggesting the need for alternative rectal-specific formulations.
