Dataset Information

Analysis of prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in primary infections in the United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To identify changes since 1994 in the prevalence of resistance to anti-HIV drugs in primary HIV-1 infections in the United Kingdom. DESIGN:Retrospective and prospective assessment of viruses obtained from people recently infected with HIV. SETTING:Multiple centres (patients enrolled in the UK register of seroconverters) and a single large HIV clinic (active case ascertainment). PARTICIPANTS:69 patients infected with HIV between June 1994 and August 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Prevalence of key mutations associated with drug resistance in the reverse transcriptase and protease genes of HIV-1, by year of infection. RESULTS:Between June 1994 and August 2000, 10 (14%) of 69 newly infected patients had one or more key HIV-1 mutations associated with drug resistance. The risk of being infected with drug resistant virus increased over time (adjusted relative risk per year 1.74 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 3.27), P=0.06). The estimated prevalence of drug resistance in those infected in 2000 was 27% (12% to 48%). CONCLUSIONS:Transmission of drug resistant HIV-1 in the United Kingdom seems to be increasing. New approaches to encourage safer sexual behaviour in all sectors of the population are urgently needed.

SUBMITTER: UK Collaborative Group on Monitoring the Transmission of HIV Drug Resistance

PROVIDER: S-EPMC31258 | biostudies-literature | 2001 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analysis of prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in primary infections in the United Kingdom.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 20010501 7294

<h4>Objectives</h4>To identify changes since 1994 in the prevalence of resistance to anti-HIV drugs in primary HIV-1 infections in the United Kingdom.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective and prospective assessment of viruses obtained from people recently infected with HIV.<h4>Setting</h4>Multiple centres (patients enrolled in the UK register of seroconverters) and a single large HIV clinic (active case ascertainment).<h4>Participants</h4>69 patients infected with HIV between June 1994 and August 2000.<h ...[more]

PMID: 11337435

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo undertake a systematic review to obtain estimates of genital Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in various populations in the United Kingdom and Ireland; to determine which populations have the highest rates of infection; and to explore the most important determinants of infection.MethodsElectronic databases were searched using the keywords "chlamydia" and "England," "Wales," "UK," "Scotland," "Ireland," or "Britain." Additional unpublished data and references were solicited from experts. Studies were included in the analysis if C trachomatis prevalence was reported, and if they met inclusion criteria. Nine variables identified as potentially important descriptors of chlamydia prevalence were extracted from each study and analysed using various logistic regression models. Only studies reporting prevalence in female populations were included in the models, because there were few data from males.Results357 studies were identified using the search methods, 90 of which met inclusion criteria, and 19 of which contributed to the final model. The most influential variables on prevalence were age and setting of the population tested. In general practice surgeries, the under 20 year old age group had an estimated prevalence of 8.1% (95% CI 6.5 to 9.9), 20-24 year olds 5.2% (95% CI 4.3 to 6.3), 25-29 year olds 2.6% (95% CI 2.0 to 3.3), decreasing to 1.4% (95% CI 1.0 to 1.9) in those aged over 30 years. Overall, healthcare settings had higher prevalence estimates than population based studies. For example, among under 20 year olds, estimates were 17.3% (95% CI 13.6 to 21.8) in genitourinary medicine clinics, 12.6% (95% CI 6.4 to 23.2) in antenatal clinics, 12.3% (95% CI 9.8 to 15.3) in termination of pregnancy clinics, 10.7% (95% CI 8.3 to 13.8) in youth clinics, 10.0% (95% CI 8.7 to 11.5) in family planning clinics, and 8.1% (95% CI 6.5 to 9.9) in general practice, compared to 5.0% (95% CI 3.2 to 7.6) in population based studies. The type of test, specimen used, date, and location of test were not strongly associated with chlamydia prevalence.ConclusionThe chlamydia prevalence estimates by age and setting from the model may be used to inform chlamydia screening strategies. The systematic review revealed much heterogeneity in the studies identified, but with clear patterns of prevalence. It also indicated gaps in the knowledge about chlamydia prevalence in certain subgroups such as men and the general population.

Project description:IntroductionWHO's 2019 report on HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) documents a high prevalence of pretreatment drug resistance (PDR) among populations initiating first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, systematic evidence on the prevalence of PDR among key populations remains limited. We performed a systematic review to characterize levels of PDR in key population groups and compared them to levels of PDR in the "general population" across different geographical regions.MethodsTen electronic databases were searched for papers published until February 2019 that included predefined search terms. We included studies that reported the number of successfully tested genotypes and the number of genotypes with drug resistance mutations among antiretroviral therapy treatment naïve people, recently infected people, or people initiating first-line ART from key populations. To assess the prevalence of PDR for each key population, we pooled estimates using random-effects meta-analysis of proportions. Where possible, we computed the differences in the odds of PDR (any, and by drug class) present in each key population compared to the "general population". The I2 statistic (a measure of heterogeneity between studies) is reported.Results and discussionA total of 332 datasets (from 218 studies) and 63,111 people with successful HIVDR genotyping were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence estimate of any PDR was high among men who have sex with men (13.0%, 95% CI 11.0 to 14.0%, I2 = 93.19), sex workers (17.0%, 95% CI 6.0 - 32.0, I2 = 87.31%) and people in prisons (18.0%, 95% CI 11.0 to 25.0, I2 = 70.18%), but less so among people who inject drugs (7.0%, 95% CI 5.0 to 10.0, I2 = 90.23). Overall, men who have sex with men were more likely to carry any PDR compared to the "general population," a finding which was statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.13 - 1.46, I2 48.9%).ConclusionsHigh prevalence of PDR found in key populations highlights the need to increase access to effective first-line HIV treatment. The low prevalence of nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) PDR suggests that current WHO recommendations for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) regimens will remain effective and can be scaled up to prevent new HIV infections in high-risk groups.

Dataset Information

Analysis of prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in primary infections in the United Kingdom.

Publications

Analysis of prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in primary infections in the United Kingdom.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets