Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates.


ABSTRACT: The commercial yeast identification systems API ID32C, Auxacolor, and Vitek were evaluated using 251 molecularly identified bloodstream isolates and 2 reference strains, representing a total of 35 species (6 common and 29 rare). Correct identification rates were higher for common species (Auxacolor, 95%; API ID32C, 94%; Vitek, 92%) than for rare species (Auxacolor, 43%; API ID32C, 56%; Vitek, 64%). All systems performed equally among the former, and Vitek performed best among the latter.

SUBMITTER: Meletiadis J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3147866 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates.

Meletiadis Joseph J   Arabatzis Michael M   Bompola Maria M   Tsiveriotis Konstantinos K   Hini Stavroula S   Petinaki Efthymia E   Velegraki Aristea A   Zerva Loukia L  

Journal of clinical microbiology 20110504 7


The commercial yeast identification systems API ID32C, Auxacolor, and Vitek were evaluated using 251 molecularly identified bloodstream isolates and 2 reference strains, representing a total of 35 species (6 common and 29 rare). Correct identification rates were higher for common species (Auxacolor, 95%; API ID32C, 94%; Vitek, 92%) than for rare species (Auxacolor, 43%; API ID32C, 56%; Vitek, 64%). All systems performed equally among the former, and Vitek performed best among the latter. ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5051641 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4400765 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7406340 | biostudies-literature
2023-04-18 | PXD041637 |
| S-EPMC87636 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7835630 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3889777 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6763648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3091684 | biostudies-literature
2010-03-18 | GSE19248 | GEO