Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A hyper-mutant of the unusual sigma70-Pr promoter bypasses synergistic ppGpp/DksA co-stimulation.


ABSTRACT: The activities of promoters can be temporally and conditionally regulated by mechanisms other than classical DNA-binding repressors and activators. One example is the inherently weak ?(70)-dependent Pr promoter that ultimately controls catabolism of phenolic compounds. The activity of Pr is up-regulated through the joint action of ppGpp and DksA that enhance the performance of RNA polymerase at this promoter. Here, we report a mutagenesis analysis that revealed substantial differences between Pr and other ppGpp/DksA co-stimulated promoters. In vitro transcription and RNA polymerase binding assays show that it is the T at the -11 position of the extremely suboptimal -10 element of Pr that underlies both poor binding of ?(70)-RNAP and a slow rate of open complex formation--the process that is accelerated by ppGpp and DksA. Our findings support the idea that collaborative action of ppGpp and DksA lowers the rate-limiting transition energy required for conversion between intermediates on the road to open complex formation.

SUBMITTER: Del Peso-Santos T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3152329 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A hyper-mutant of the unusual sigma70-Pr promoter bypasses synergistic ppGpp/DksA co-stimulation.

Del Peso-Santos Teresa T   Bernardo Lisandro M D LM   Skärfstad Eleonore E   Holmfeldt Linda L   Togneri Peter P   Shingler Victoria V  

Nucleic acids research 20110329 14


The activities of promoters can be temporally and conditionally regulated by mechanisms other than classical DNA-binding repressors and activators. One example is the inherently weak σ(70)-dependent Pr promoter that ultimately controls catabolism of phenolic compounds. The activity of Pr is up-regulated through the joint action of ppGpp and DksA that enhance the performance of RNA polymerase at this promoter. Here, we report a mutagenesis analysis that revealed substantial differences between Pr  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4446441 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4330370 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1142371 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5837818 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2687150 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC348808 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4496623 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3078377 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6456864 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6804348 | biostudies-literature