Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Reduction of claustrophobia with short-bore versus open magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized controlled trial.


ABSTRACT: Claustrophobia is a common problem precluding MR imaging. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether a short-bore or an open magnetic resonance (MR) scanner is superior in alleviating claustrophobia.Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained to compare short-bore versus open MR. From June 2008 to August 2009, 174 patients (139 women; mean age?=?53.1 [SD 12.8]) with an overall mean score of 2.4 (SD 0.7, range 0 to 4) on the Claustrophobia Questionnaire (CLQ) and a clinical indication for imaging, were randomly assigned to receive evaluation by open or by short-bore MR. The primary outcomes were incomplete MR examinations due to a claustrophobic event. Follow-up was conducted 7 months after MR imaging. The primary analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat strategy.With 33 claustrophobic events in the short-bore group (39% [95% confidence interval [CI] 28% to 50%) versus 23 in the open scanner group (26% [95% CI 18% to 37%]; P?=?0.08) the difference was not significant. Patients with an event were in the examination room for 3.8 min (SD 4.4) in the short-bore and for 8.5 min (SD 7) in the open group (P?=?0.004). This was due to an earlier occurrence of events in the short-bore group. The CLQ suffocation subscale was significantly associated with the occurrence of claustrophobic events (P?=?0.003). New findings that explained symptoms were found in 69% of MR examinations and led to changes in medical treatment in 47% and surgery in 10% of patients. After 7 months, perceived claustrophobia increased in 32% of patients with events versus in only 11% of patients without events (P?=?0.004).Even recent MR cannot prevent claustrophobia suggesting that further developments to create a more patient-centered MR scanner environment are needed.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00715806.

SUBMITTER: Enders J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3161742 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Reduction of claustrophobia with short-bore versus open magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized controlled trial.

Enders Judith J   Zimmermann Elke E   Rief Matthias M   Martus Peter P   Klingebiel Randolf R   Asbach Patrick P   Klessen Christian C   Diederichs Gerd G   Wagner Moritz M   Teichgräber Ulf U   Bengner Thomas T   Hamm Bernd B   Dewey Marc M  

PloS one 20110822 8


<h4>Background</h4>Claustrophobia is a common problem precluding MR imaging. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether a short-bore or an open magnetic resonance (MR) scanner is superior in alleviating claustrophobia.<h4>Methods</h4>Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained to compare short-bore versus open MR. From June 2008 to August 2009, 174 patients (139 women; mean age = 53.1 [SD 12.8]) with an overall mean score of 2.4 (SD 0.7, range 0 to  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3877023 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3045881 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5079441 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7816236 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7283935 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5464696 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9257664 | biostudies-literature
2018-12-01 | GSE101908 | GEO
2023-11-03 | GSE239379 | GEO