Dataset Information

Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts.

ABSTRACT:

Background

No comparisons of different doses of docetaxel-capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer have been performed.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated metastatic/locally advanced gastro-oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Two sequential cohorts received docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 1) plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort I) or docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) (day 1) plus capecitabine 800 mg m(-2) twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort II) every 3 weeks. The primary end point was confirmed overall response rate.

Results

In all, 91 patients were enrolled (cohort I, n=40; cohort II, n=51) and 87 were evaluable for efficacy (n=38, 49, respectively). Overall response rate was 50.0% in cohort I and 23.5% in cohort II (exploratory analysis, P=0.014). Median times to tumour progression and overall survival were 5.6 and 10.1 months in cohort I and 3.7 and 7.2 months in cohort II, respectively. Dose reductions for docetaxel and capecitabine were required in 50.0% and 57.5% of patients in cohort I and 11.8% and 15.7% in cohort II, respectively.

Conclusion

Starting treatment with full doses and reducing promptly seems to be the more promisingly effective strategy than starting cautiously with lower doses. Docetaxel/capecitabine 75/2000 mg m(-2) is a manageable, convenient outpatient combination with promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.

SUBMITTER: Thuss-Patience PC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3170974 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts.

Thuss-Patience P C PC Kretzschmar A A Dogan Y Y Rothmann F F Blau I I Schwaner I I Breithaupt K K Bichev D D Grothoff M M Grieser C C Reichardt P P

British journal of cancer 20110726 4

<h4>Background</h4>No comparisons of different doses of docetaxel-capecitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer have been performed.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with previously untreated metastatic/locally advanced gastro-oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Two sequential cohorts received docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) (day 1) plus capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily (days 1-14) (cohort I) or docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) (day 1) plus capecitabi ...[more]

PMID: 21792201

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionCurrent treatment options for advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC) are still unsatisfactory. The aim of this prospective phase Ib/II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel regimen, AVDCX, consisting of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin together with capecitabine and bevacizumab, in AEGC.MethodsPatients with AEGC received treatment with different dose levels of AVDCX (cisplatin and docetaxel 25-35 mg/m2, days 1,8, capecitabine 1,600 mg/m2 days 1-14, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, day 1, Q:21 days). The study's primary objectives were to establish the recommended phase II doses of docetaxel and cisplatin in AVDCX (phase Ib part) and to determine the tumor response rate (phase II part).ResultsThe study was closed early, after the accrual of 22 patients, due to accumulating toxicity-related deaths. The median age was 59 years and 77% of patients had gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Grade ≥3 adverse events were documented in 18 patients (82%), usually neutropenia (36%), fatigue (54%) or diarrhea (23%). There were three fatal toxicities (14%): mesenteric thromboembolism, gastric perforation and pancytopenic sepsis. The recommended phase II doses of cisplatin and docetaxel were determined to be 25 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. Twenty-one patients were evaluable for response: 12 (54%) had partial response (PR), 4 (18%) had stable disease (SD) and none had complete response (CR). Hence, the objective response rate (CR+PR) was 54% and the disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 72%. For the 17 patients treated at the MTD, the objective response rate was 41% and the disease control rate was 88%. The median overall survival (OS) for these patients was 13.9 months (range, 1.5-52.2 months) and the median progression-free survival was 7.6 months (range, 1.3-26.6 months). The 2-year OS rate reached 23.7%.ConclusionsAVDCX was associated with a high rate of regimen related fatal adverse events and is not appropriate for further development in AEGC patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00845884.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies of the second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJAC) had reported that apatinib combined with chemotherapy improved the treatment outcomes. However, the benefits were sometimes limited due to the tolerance of continuous dose regimen. This randomized controlled study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of intermittent or continuous dose apatinib plus docetaxel as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJAC.MethodsAdvanced GC/GEJAC patients who failed first-line chemotherapy were recruited (enrollment time: from September 15, 2017 to July 21, 2019), and randomly assigned to either the intermittent dose group (IG group) or the continuous dose group (CG group) (1:1 ratio) using the block randomization method. In the IG group, patients received apatinib 500 mg/d for 5 consecutive days then held for 2 days plus docetaxel 60 mg/m2 q3w, in a 3-week cycle. In the CG group, patients received apatinib 500 mg daily plus docetaxel 60 mg/m2 q3w, in a 3-week cycle. The progression free survival (PFS) was evaluated every two cycles and follow-ups were performed monthly. The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsIn total, 76 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1 ratio). The IG group exhibited similar PFS compared to the CG group [median PFS: 3.88 (95% CI: 1.72-6.03) months vs. 3.98 (95% CI: 1.06-6.90) months, P=0.546] and OS [median OS: 9.00 (95% CI: 5.31-12.70) months vs. 9.40 (95% CI: 5.20-13.59) months, P=0.310]. ORR (21.1% vs. 18.4%, P=0.773) and DCR (60.5% vs. 60.5%, P=1.000) were of not statistically different between the IG and CG groups. As for safety, the IG group exhibited less frequent hypoproteinemia (31.6% vs. 55.3%, P=0.037) and lactate dehydrogenase increased (18.4% vs. 44.7%, P=0.014), while no differences in other adverse events were observed between the two groups.ConclusionsIntermittent dose apatinib plus docetaxel was equally effective and more tolerable than continuous dose apatinib plus docetaxel as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJAC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03334591.

Dataset Information

Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Docetaxel and capecitabine for advanced gastric cancer: investigating dose-dependent efficacy in two patient cohorts.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets