Dataset Information

Comparative accuracy of anal and cervical cytology in screening for moderate to severe dysplasia by magnification guided punch biopsy: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The accuracy of screening for anal cancer precursors relative to screening for cervical cancer precursors has not been systematically examined. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to compare the relative accuracy of anal cytology to cervical cytology in discriminating between histopathologic high grade and lesser grades of dysplasia when the reference standard biopsy is obtained using colposcope magnification.

Methods and findings

The outcome metric of discrimination was the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area. Random effects meta-analysis of eligible studies was performed with examination of sources of heterogeneity that included QUADAS criteria and selected covariates, in meta-regression models. Thirty three cervical and eleven anal screening studies were found to be eligible. The primary meta-analytic comparison suggested that anal cytologic screening is somewhat less discriminating than cervical cytologic screening (ROC area [95% confidence interval (C.I.)]: 0.834 [0.809-0.859] vs. 0.700 [0.664-0.735] for cervical and anal screening, respectively). This finding was robust when examined in meta-regression models of covariates differentially distributed by screening setting (anal, cervical).

Conclusions

Anal cytologic screening is somewhat less discriminating than cervical cytologic screening. Heterogeneity of estimates within each screening setting suggests that other factors influence estimates of screening accuracy. Among these are sampling and interpretation errors involving both cytology and biopsy as well as operator skill and experience.

SUBMITTER: Mathews WC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3176293 | biostudies-literature | 2011

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative accuracy of anal and cervical cytology in screening for moderate to severe dysplasia by magnification guided punch biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Mathews Wm Christopher WC Agmas Wollelaw W Cachay Edward E

PloS one 20110919 9

<h4>Background</h4>The accuracy of screening for anal cancer precursors relative to screening for cervical cancer precursors has not been systematically examined. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to compare the relative accuracy of anal cytology to cervical cytology in discriminating between histopathologic high grade and lesser grades of dysplasia when the reference standard biopsy is obtained using colposcope magnification.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>The outcome metric of discriminati ...[more]

PMID: 21949801

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe main aim of this study was to ascertain the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC) in the diagnosis of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis in uterine cervical cancer and to establish its potential impact on clinical therapeutic decision making.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 92 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer with PALN enlargement between 2010 and 2018. Cytological results obtained with US-FNAC were classified by the same experienced cellular pathologists. Diagnostic indicators were determined on the basis of biopsy, imaging and clinical follow-up results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the differences of influencing factors. The effect of US-FNAC on clinical decision making was evaluated.ResultsCytological results of US-FNAC were categorized as malignancy (n = 62; 67.4%), suspicious malignancy (n = 11; 12.0%), undetermined (n = 5; 5.4%), benign (n = 10; 10.9%), and inadequate (n = 4; 4.3%). Satisfactory biopsy samples were obtained from 95.7% of PALNs sampled (88/92). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of FNAC in distinguishing benign from malignant cases were 90.1% (95% CI: 0.809-0.953), 100% (95% CI: 0.561-1), 100% (95% CI: 0.938-1), 46.7% (95% CI: 0.223-0.726) and 90.9% (95% CI: 0.848-0.970), respectively. Univariate analysis indicated significant differences in experience of puncture physicians (radiologists) between the correct and wrong diagnosis groups (P < 0.05), which was further confirmed as an independent predictor of diagnostic accuracy in multivariate analysis (p = 0.031, OR = 0.077, 95% CI: 0.354-0.919). All patients tolerated the US-FNAC procedure well and only nine presented slight abdominal discomfort. The therapeutic strategies for 74 patients (80.4%) were influenced by US-FNAC findings.ConclusionsUS-FNAC was a relatively safe and effective technique for examination of enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes and may therefore serve as a routine diagnostic tool to guide clinical decision making for management of cervical cancer.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and core-needle biopsy (US-FNAC/CNB) for the diagnosis of laryngo-hypopharyngeal masses.Materials and methodsThis was a single-center prospective case series. From January 2018 to June 2019, we initially enrolled 40 patients with highly suspicious laryngo-hypopharyngeal masses on laryngoscopic examinations. Of these, 28 patients with the mass involving or abutting the pre-epiglottic, paraglottic, pyriform sinus, and/or subglottic regions were finally included. These patients underwent US examinations with/without subsequent US-FNAC/CNB under local anesthesia for evaluation of the laryngo-hypopharyngeal mass.ResultsOf the 28 patients who underwent US examinations, a laryngo-hypopharyngeal mass was identified in 26 patients (92.9%). US-FNAC/CNB was performed successfully in 25 of these patients (96.2%), while the procedure failed to target the mass in 1 patient (3.8%). The performance of US caused minor subclinical hematoma in 2 patients (7.7%), but no major complications occurred. US-FNAC/CNB yielded conclusive results in 24 (96.0%) out of the 25 patients with a successful procedure, including 23 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 1 patient with a benign mass. In one patient with atypical cells in US-FNAC, additional direct laryngoscopic biopsy (DLB) was required to confirm SCC. Among the 26 patients who received US-FNAC/CNB, the time from first visit to pathological diagnosis was 7.8 days. For 24 patients finally diagnosed with SCC, the time from first visit to the initiation of treatment was 25.2 days. The mean costs associated with US-FNAC/CNB was $272 under the Korean National Health Insurance Service System.ConclusionUS-FNAC/CNB for a laryngo-hypopharyngeal mass is technically feasible in selected patients, providing good diagnostic performance. This technique could be used as a first-line diagnostic modality by adopting appropriate indications to avoid general anesthesia and DLB-related complications.

Project description:ImportanceImage-guided breast biopsy of a residual imaging abnormality or tumor bed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly used to assess residual cancer, facilitate risk-adaptive surgery, and potentially identify exceptional responders in whom local therapy may be de-escalated.ObjectiveTo further assess the accuracy of post-NACT image-guided biopsy to predict residual cancer in the breast.Design, setting, and participantsThis diagnostic study analyzed multicenter patient-level data of patients with breast cancer who were treated with NACT and underwent image-guided biopsy before surgery at Royal Marsden Hospital in London, UK; Seoul National University Hospital in Seoul, South Korea; and MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. Data were analyzed from June to July 2019.Main outcomes and measuresDiagnostic accuracy of post-NACT image-guided biopsy. Final surgical pathology was used as reference standard.ResultsData from 166 women were analyzed. The median (range) age was 49 (25-76) years. The median (range) tumor size on pretreatment and posttreatment imaging was 33.5 (12-100) mm and 10 (0-100) mm, respectively. The overall pathologic complete response rate was 51.2% (n = 85) (16.1% [5 of 31] for hormone receptor-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative; 44.7% [21 of 47] for hormone receptor-positive/ERBB2-positive; 69% [20 of 29] for hormone receptor-negative/ERBB2-positive; and 66.1% [39 of 59] for triple negative). The majority (143 [86.1%]) underwent image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), and 23 had core-cut biopsy. The median (range) needle gauge was 10 (7-14), and the median (range) number of samples was 6 (2-18). When image-guided biopsy (VAB and core-cut biopsy) was representative (159 [95.8%]), the false-negative rate across the whole cohort was 18.7% (95% CI, 10.6%-29.3%). Subgroup analysis of patients with a complete/partial clinical response and residual imaging abnormality of 2 cm or smaller with at least 6 VABs taken (76 [45.8%]) demonstrated a false-negative rate of 3.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-16.7%), a negative predictive value of 97.4% (95% CI, 86.5%-99.9%), and an overall accuracy of 89.5% (95% CI, 80.3%-95.3%).Conclusions and relevanceThis large multicenter pooled data analysis suggests that a standardized protocol using image-guided VAB of a tumor bed measuring 2 cm or smaller with 6 or more representative samples allows reliable prediction of residual disease. These results could inform the design of de-escalation trials in NACT exceptional responders testing the safety of eliminating surgery.

Dataset Information

Comparative accuracy of anal and cervical cytology in screening for moderate to severe dysplasia by magnification guided punch biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Background

Methods and findings

Conclusions

Publications

Comparative accuracy of anal and cervical cytology in screening for moderate to severe dysplasia by magnification guided punch biopsy: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets