Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent at 13-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography substudy from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial.


ABSTRACT: To compare the tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) at 13 months, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an 'all-comers' population of patients, in order to clarify the mechanism of eventual differences in the biocompatibility and thrombogenicity of the devices.Patients randomized to angiographic follow-up in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (NCT00617084) at pre-specified OCT sites underwent OCT follow-up at 13 months. Tissue coverage and apposition were assessed strut by strut, and the results in both treatment groups were compared using multilevel logistic or linear regression, as appropriate, with clustering at three different levels: patient, lesion, and stent. Fifty-eight patients (30 ZES and 28 EES), 72 lesions, 107 stents, and 23 197 struts were analysed. Eight hundred and eighty-seven and 654 uncovered struts (7.4 and 5.8%, P= 0.378), and 216 and 161 malapposed struts (1.8 and 1.4%, P= 0.569) were found in the ZES and EES groups, respectively. The mean thickness of coverage was 116 ± 99 µm in ZES and 142 ± 113 µm in EES (P= 0.466). No differences in per cent neointimal volume obstruction (12.5 ± 7.9 vs. 15.0 ± 10.7%) or other areas-volumetric parameters were found between ZES and EES, respectively.No significant differences in tissue coverage, malapposition, or lumen/stent areas and volumes were detected by OCT between the hydrophilic polymer-coated ZES and the fluoropolymer-coated EES at 13-month follow-up.

SUBMITTER: Gutierrez-Chico JL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3184229 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent at 13-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography substudy from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial.

Gutiérrez-Chico Juan Luis JL   van Geuns Robert Jan RJ   Regar Evelyn E   van der Giessen Willem J WJ   Kelbæk Henning H   Saunamäki Kari K   Escaned Javier J   Gonzalo Nieves N   di Mario Carlo C   Borgia Francesco F   Nüesch Eveline E   García-García Héctor M HM   Silber Sigmund S   Windecker Stephan S   Serruys Patrick W PW  

European heart journal 20110609 19


<h4>Aims</h4>To compare the tissue coverage of a hydrophilic polymer-coated zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) vs. a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) at 13 months, using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in an 'all-comers' population of patients, in order to clarify the mechanism of eventual differences in the biocompatibility and thrombogenicity of the devices.<h4>Methods and results</h4>Patients randomized to angiographic follow-up in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (NCT00617084  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3846488 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3842627 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5490976 | biostudies-literature
2011-04-22 | GSE28781 | GEO
| S-EPMC11308709 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3325867 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7531093 | biostudies-literature
2011-04-22 | E-GEOD-28781 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC9545912 | biostudies-literature