Dataset Information

Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed.

Results

In the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 patients had undergone a primary tumor resection and 141 and 159 patients had not, respectively. In the CAIRO study, a significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival was observed for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 16.7 vs. 11.4 months [P<0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61], and 6.7 vs. 5.9 months (P=0.004; HR 0.74), respectively. In the CAIRO2 study, median overall survival and progression-free survival were also significantly better for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 20.7 vs. 13.4 months (P<0.0001; HR 0.65) and 10.5 vs. 7.8 months (P=0.014; HR 0.78), respectively. These differences remained significant in multivariate analyses. Our review identified 22 nonrandomized studies, most of which showed improved survival for mCRC patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor.

Conclusions

Our results as well as data from literature indicate that resection of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor for survival in stage IV CRC patients. The potential bias of these results warrants prospective studies on the value of resection of primary tumor in this setting; such studies are currently being planned.

SUBMITTER: Venderbosch S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3192274 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature.

Venderbosch Sabine S de Wilt Johannes H JH Teerenstra Steven S Loosveld Olaf J OJ van Bochove Aart A Sinnige Harm A HA Creemers Geert-Jan M GJ Tesselaar Margot E ME Mol Linda L Punt Cornelis J A CJ Koopman Miriam M

Annals of surgical oncology 20110806 12

<h4>Background</h4>In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed.<h4>Results</h4>In the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 pa ...[more]

PMID: 21822557

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough the safety of combination chemotherapy without primary tumor resection (PTR) in patients with stage IV colon cancer has been established, questions remain regarding a potential survival benefit with PTR. The objective of this study was to compare mortality rates in patients who had colon cancer with unresectable metastases who did and did not undergo PTR.MethodsAn observational cohort study was conducted among patients with unresectable metastatic colon cancer identified from the National Cancer Data Base (2003-2005). Multivariate Cox regression analyses with and without propensity score weighting (PSW) were performed to compare survival outcomes. Instrumental variable analysis, using the annual hospital-level PTR rate as the instrument, was used to account for treatment selection bias. To account for survivor treatment bias, in situations in which patients might die soon after diagnosis from different reasons, a landmark method was used.ResultsIn the total cohort, 8641 of 15,154 patients (57%) underwent PTR, and 73.8% of those procedures (4972 of 6735) were at landmark. PTR was associated with a significant reduction in mortality using Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.47) or PSW (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0. 44-0.49). However, instrumental variable analysis revealed a much smaller effect (relative mortality rate, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96). Although a smaller benefit was observed with the landmark method using Cox regression (HR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.55-0.64) and PSW (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.54-0.64), instrumental variable analysis revealed no survival benefit (relative mortality rate, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06).ConclusionsAmong patients with unresectable metastatic colon cancer, after adjustment for confounder effects, PTR was not associated with improved survival compared with systemic chemotherapy; therefore, routine noncurative PTR is not recommended. Cancer 2017;123:1124-1133. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Project description:BackgroundThe presence of a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with increased mortality in several malignancies. And the majority of studies on breast cancer (BC) analyzed patients with early-stage. Fewer studies focused on metastatic BC (MBC). De novo stage IV BC with no prior treatment is more suitable for analyzing prognostic factors. Herein, we examined the prognostic value of baseline NLR in de novo stage IV BC patients.MethodsWe retrospectively screened the medical records of female patients who were diagnosed with de novo stage IV BC at Peking University Cancer Hospital between January 2011 and December 2020. All patients were followed up by telephone every 6 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of NLR for progression-free survival (PFS). Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Correlations of PFS and overall survival (OS) with NLR and other clinicopathological factors were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses.ResultsA total of 128 patients between January 2011 and December 2020 were enrolled. 70 (54.7%) cases were hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, 79 (61.7%) patients had visceral metastasis and 67 (52.3%) patients had more than 2 metastatic sites. The cutoff values of NLR were 2.9, optimized by ROC curve analysis. Totals of 77 and 51 patients were assigned to the NLR-low (≤2.9) and NLR-high (>2.9) groups, respectively. Compared with NLR-high patients, the NLR-low patients had significantly longer median PFS (14.8 vs. 7.2 months; hazard ratio =1.791; P=0.003). The OS showed no significant difference (64.1 vs. 56.0 months, P=0.980). The patients with NLR-low had a higher level of peripheral CD3+ T cells (P=0.028) and a lower level of peripheral CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells (P=0.041). Patient samples with NLR-low also demonstrated higher levels of TILs than those with NLR-high (P=0.025).ConclusionsThe baseline NLR-high is associated with adverse PFS in patients with de novo stage IV BC. The NLR-high status may indicate immune suppression status, which can help identify patients with unfavorable prognosis and assist with physicians' treatment decision.

Dataset Information

Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Prognostic value of resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of two randomized studies and a review of the literature.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets