Dataset Information

Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To assess the accuracy of the shutter-speed approach compared with standard approach dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging pharmacokinetic analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from 89 high-risk women (age range, 28-83 years) who had 92 suspicious lesions with negative findings at mammography (but visible at MR imaging). Each underwent a research dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging examination just prior to a clinical MR imaging-guided interventional procedure. Tumor region of interest (ROI) averaged and (for some) pixel-by-pixel dynamic contrast-enhanced time-course data, together with mean arterial input function, were subjected to serial standard and shutter-speed approach analyses to extract pharmacokinetic parameters, including rate constant for passive contrast reagent transfer between plasma and interstitium (K(trans)) and interstitial space volume fraction, or v(e). Pathologic findings were used as reference standards. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analyses.

Results

The pathologic analyses revealed 20 malignant and 72 benign lesions. Positive predictive value of the institutional clinical breast MR imaging protocol was 22%. At 100% sensitivity, ROI-averaged shutter-speed approach K(trans) had significantly (P = .008) higher diagnostic specificity than standard approach K(trans): 86.1% versus 77.8%. The difference in the ROI-averaged K(trans) parameter value, or ?K(trans) (? K(trans) [shutter-speed approach] - K(trans) [standard approach]), had even higher specificity (88.9%). Combined use of ROI analysis and pixel-by-pixel mapping of ?K(trans) achieved 98.6% specificity at 100% sensitivity.

Conclusion

The use of the shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging method has the potential to improve breast cancer diagnostic accuracy and reduce putatively unnecessary biopsy procedures that yield benign pathologic findings.

Supplemental material

http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11102413/-/DC1.

SUBMITTER: Huang W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3198224 | biostudies-literature | 2011 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Huang Wei W Tudorica Luminita A LA Li Xin X Thakur Sunitha B SB Chen Yiyi Y Morris Elizabeth A EA Tagge Ian J IJ Korenblit Maayan E ME Rooney William D WD Koutcher Jason A JA Springer Charles S CS

Radiology 20110809 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>To assess the accuracy of the shutter-speed approach compared with standard approach dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging pharmacokinetic analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>This study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was obtained from 89 high-risk women (age range, 28-83 years) who had 92 suspicious lesions with negative findings at mammography (but visible at MR ...[more]

PMID: 21828189

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to validate a kinetic assessment based on visually identified peak enhancement, which is routinely used in clinical practice, for differentiating benign from malignant lesions during fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Materials and methodsBetween January 2015 and December 2016, 90 consecutively registered patients with 105 breast lesions (40 benign, 65 malignant) underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced 1.5-T MRI that included one unenhanced and eight contrast-enhanced fast temporal resolution (10 seconds) whole-breast acquisitions. Histogram analysis was performed to measure the voxel-based enhancement of the entire lesion to obtain 90th, 75th, and 50th percentile values at each time point and to generate kinetic curves. Two observers selected visually identified peak enhancement within the lesions to generate the kinetic curves. The kinetic curves from histogram and visually identified peak enhancement analyses were fitted by means of an empiric mathematic model (EMM): ΔS(t) = A × (1 - e-αt), where A is the upper limit of signal intensity, e indicates the exponential function, and α (min-1) is the rate of increase in signal intensity. The initial slope of the kinetic curve (A × α) and the initial AUC (AUC30) were calculated. These parameters were compared between benign and malignant lesions, and results from visually identified peak enhancement analysis were compared with those from histogram analysis.ResultsBenign lesions were successfully differentiated from malignant lesions in both visually identified peak enhancement and histogram analyses (90th and 75th percentile values) on the basis of α, A × α, and AUC30 from the EMM. There was no significant difference in ROC AUC in these EMM parameters between visually identified peak enhancement and histogram analyses (p = 0.21).ConclusionKinetic assessment with visually identified peak enhancement was acceptable for differentiating benign from malignant lesions.

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to employ a kinetic model with dynamic contrast enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging to develop an approach that can efficiently distinguish malignant from benign lesions.Materials and methodsA total of 43 patients with 46 lesions who underwent breast dynamic contrast enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging were included in this retrospective study. The distribution of malignant to benign lesions was 31/15 based on histological results. This study integrated a single-compartment kinetic model and dynamic contrast enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging to generate a kinetic modeling curve for improving the accuracy of diagnosis of breast lesions. Kinetic modeling curves of all different lesions were analyzed by three experienced radiologists and classified into one of three given types. Receiver operating characteristic and Kappa statistics were used for the qualitative method. The findings of the three radiologists based on the time-signal intensity curve and the kinetic curve were compared.ResultsAn average sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 65%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76, and a positive predictive value of 82% and negative predictive value of 63% was shown with the kinetic model (p = 0.017, 0.052, 0.068), as compared to an average sensitivity of 80%, a specificity of 55%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.69, and a positive predictive value of 79% and negative predictive value of 57% with the time-signal intensity curve method (p = 0.003, 0.004, 0.008). The diagnostic consistency of the three radiologists was shown by the κ-value, 0.857 (p<0.001) with the method based on the time-signal intensity curve and 0.826 (p<0.001) with the method of the kinetic model.ConclusionsAccording to the statistic results based on the 46 lesions, the kinetic modeling curve method showed higher sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values as compared with the time-signal intensity curve method in lesion classification.

Project description:PurposeTo assess the performance of computer-extracted dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging kinetic and morphologic features in the differentiation of invasive versus noninvasive breast lesions and metastatic versus nonmetastatic breast lesions.Materials and methodsIn this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant study, in which the requirement for informed patient consent was waived, breast MR images were retrospectively collected. The images had been obtained with a 1.5-T MR unit by using a gadodiamide-enhanced T1-weighted spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state sequence. The breast MR imaging database contained 132 benign, 71 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 150 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) lesions. Fifty-four IDC lesions were associated with metastasis-positive lymph nodes (LNs), and 64 IDC lesions were associated with negative LNs. Lesion segmentation and extraction of morphologic and kinetic features were automatically performed by a laboratory-developed computer workstation. Features were first selected by using stepwise linear discriminant analysis and then merged by using Bayesian neural networks. Lesion classification performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis.ResultsDifferentiation of DCIS from IDC lesions yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 +/- 0.03 (standard error). AUCs were 0.85 +/- 0.02 for differentiation between IDC and benign lesions and 0.79 +/- 0.03 for differentiation between DCIS and benign lesions. Differentiation between IDC lesions associated with positive LNs and IDC lesions associated with negative LNs yielded an AUC of 0.82 +/- 0.04. AUCs were 0.86 +/- 0.03 for differentiation between IDC lesions associated with positive LNs and benign lesions and 0.83 +/- 0.03 for differentiation between IDC lesions associated with negative LNs and benign lesions.ConclusionComputer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE MR imaging-depicted lesions was extended from the task of discriminating between malignant and benign lesions to the prognostic tasks of distinguishing between noninvasive and invasive lesions and discriminating between metastatic and nonmetastatic lesions, yielding MR imaging-based prognostic markers.Supplemental materialhttp://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.09090838/-/DC1.

Project description:The aim of the present study was to assess the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in distinguishing between malignant and benign breast lesions and the diagnostic value of its clinical application. A total of 52 cases with malignant breast tumors and 73 cases with benign breast lesions were included in the study. Time-intensity curves (TICs) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound were recorded, and the perfusion parameters were obtained and analyzed. Typical features of malignant breast tumors included irregular shape and vascular morphology, uneven contrast agent distribution, filling defects and contrast agent retention, 'fast-out' wash-out mode, unclear boundaries and uneven internal echo. Benign lesions were characterized by 'slow-out' or synchronous wash-out mode. Regarding perfusion, the starting time of the perfusion of the Sone-Vue microbubble contrast (always 20-30 sec) and time to peak (TTP) were significantly earlier for the malignant lesions, while the wash-out time was later. A significantly greater peak intensity, rising slope and area under the TIC were observed for the malignant breast lesions. All of the malignant breast lesions exhibited an enlarged focus scope on ultrasound, while no obvious focus scope enhancement was observed for benign breast lesions. Furthermore, the TICs of 88.4% of malignant breast lesions were of the fast-rising and slow-declining type, while the TICs of 75.3 and 17.8% of the benign breast lesions were of the slow-rising and fast-declining, and fast-rising and fast-declining type, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics analysis indicated that the TTP, wash-out time and rising slope might contribute to the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions. In conclusion, TIC parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound have promising clinical value in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. The TTP, wash-out time and rising slope may contribute to the diagnosis of patients with breast lesions to facilitate timely treatment and prognostication of breast cancer patients.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging characteristics of nonmalignant lesion subtypes assessed as false-positive findings at conventional breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.Materials and methodsThis HIPAA-compliant retrospective study had institutional review board approval, and the need for informed patient consent was waived. Lesions assessed as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 at clinical dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging that subsequently proved nonmalignant at biopsy were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred seventy-five nonmalignant breast lesions in 165 women were evaluated. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) from DW imaging (b = 0, 600 sec/mm(2)) were calculated for each lesion and were compared between subtypes and with an ADC threshold of 1.81 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec (determined in a prior study to achieve 100% sensitivity).ResultsEighty-one (46%) lesions exhibited ADCs greater than the predetermined threshold. The most prevalent lesion subtypes with mean ADCs above the threshold were fibroadenoma ([1.94 ± 0.38 {standard deviation}] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 30), focal fibrosis ([1.84 ± 0.48] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 19), normal tissue ([1.81 ± 0.47] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 13), apocrine metaplasia ([2.01 ± 0.38] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 13), usual ductal hyperplasia ([1.83 ± 0.49] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 12), and inflammation ([1.95 ± 0.46] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 10). Atypical ductal hyperplasia ([1.48 ± 0.36] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 23) was the most common lesion subtype with ADC below the threshold. Lymph nodes exhibited the lowest mean ADC of all nonmalignant lesions ([1.28 ± 0.23] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; n = 4). High-risk lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular neoplasia) showed significantly lower ADCs than other benign lesions (P < .0001) and were the most common lesions with ADCs below the threshold.ConclusionAssessing ADC along with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features may decrease the number of avoidable false-positive findings at breast MR imaging and reduce the number of preventable biopsies. The ability of DW imaging to help differentiate high-risk lesions requiring additional work-up from other nonmalignant subtypes may further improve patient care.Supplemental materialhttp://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12112672/-/DC1.

Dataset Information

Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Supplemental material

Publications

Discrimination of benign and malignant breast lesions by using shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets