Dataset Information

Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: beyond sparing the parotid glands.

ABSTRACT: To assess whether, in addition to sparing the parotid glands (PGs), xerostomia after chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (chemo-IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer is affected by reducing the dose to the other salivary glands.In a prospective study, 78 patients with Stage III-IV oropharynx/nasopharynx cancer underwent chemo-IMRT, with the aim of sparing the parts of the bilateral PGs, oral cavity (OC) containing the minor salivary glands, and contralateral submandibular gland (SMG) outside the target (when contralateral level I was not a target). Before therapy and periodically for 24 months, validated patient-reported xerostomia questionnaire (XQ) scores and observer-graded xerostomia scores were recorded. Also, the stimulated and unstimulated saliva was measured selectively from each of the PGs and SMGs. The mean OC doses served as surrogates of minor salivary gland dysfunction. Regression models assessed the XQ and observer-graded xerostomia predictors.Statistically significant predictors of the XQ score on univariate analysis included the OC, PG, and SMG mean doses and the baseline XQ score, time since RT, and both stimulated and unstimulated PG saliva flow rates. Similar factors were statistically significant predictors of observer-graded xerostomia. The OC, PG, and SMG mean doses were moderately intercorrelated (r = 0.47-0.55). On multivariate analyses, after adjusting for the PG and SMG doses, the OC mean dose (p < .0001), interval from RT (p < .0001), and stimulated PG saliva (p < .0025) were significant predictors of the XQ scores and the OC mean dose and time for observer-graded xerostomia. Although scatter plots showed no thresholds, an OC mean dose of <40 Gy and contralateral SMG mean dose of <50 Gy were each associated with low patient-reported and observer-rated xerostomia at almost all post-therapy points.The PG, SMG, and OC mean doses were significant predictors of both patient-reported and observer-rated xerostomia after chemo-IMRT, with OC doses remaining significant after adjusting for the PG and SMG doses. These results support efforts to spare all the salivary glands by IMRT, beyond the PGs alone.

SUBMITTER: Little M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3288420 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: beyond sparing the parotid glands.

Little Michael M Schipper Matthew M Feng Felix Y FY Vineberg Karen K Cornwall Craig C Murdoch-Kinch Carol-Anne CA Eisbruch Avraham A

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 20111104 3

<h4>Purpose</h4>To assess whether, in addition to sparing the parotid glands (PGs), xerostomia after chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (chemo-IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer is affected by reducing the dose to the other salivary glands.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>In a prospective study, 78 patients with Stage III-IV oropharynx/nasopharynx cancer underwent chemo-IMRT, with the aim of sparing the parts of the bilateral PGs, oral cavity (OC) containing the minor salivary glands, an ...[more]

PMID: 22056067

Similar Datasets

Project description:Sparing of single-side parotid gland is a common practice in head-and-neck (HN) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning. It is a special case of dose sparing tradeoff between different organs-at-risk. The authors describe an improved mathematical model for predicting achievable dose sparing in parotid glands in HN IMRT planning that incorporates single-side sparing considerations based on patient anatomy and learning from prior plan data.Among 68 HN cases analyzed retrospectively, 35 cases had physician prescribed single-side parotid sparing preferences. The single-side sparing model was trained with cases which had single-side sparing preferences, while the standard model was trained with the remainder of cases. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the best criterion that separates the two case groups using the physician's single-side sparing prescription as ground truth. The final predictive model (combined model) takes into account the single-side sparing by switching between the standard and single-side sparing models according to the single-side sparing criterion. The models were tested with 20 additional cases. The significance of the improvement of prediction accuracy by the combined model over the standard model was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.Using the ROC analysis, the best single-side sparing criterion is (1) the predicted median dose of one parotid is higher than 24 Gy; and (2) that of the other is higher than 7 Gy. This criterion gives a true positive rate of 0.82 and a false positive rate of 0.19, respectively. For the bilateral sparing cases, the combined and the standard models performed equally well, with the median of the prediction errors for parotid median dose being 0.34 Gy by both models (p = 0.81). For the single-side sparing cases, the standard model overestimates the median dose by 7.8 Gy on average, while the predictions by the combined model differ from actual values by only 2.2 Gy (p = 0.005). Similarly, the sum of residues between the modeled and the actual plan DVHs is the same for the bilateral sparing cases by both models (p = 0.67), while the standard model predicts significantly higher DVHs than the combined model for the single-side sparing cases (p = 0.01).The combined model for predicting parotid sparing that takes into account single-side sparing improves the prediction accuracy over the previous model.

Project description:PurposeTo analyze baseline CT/MR-based image features of salivary glands to predict radiation-induced xerostomia 3-months after head-and-neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 266 HNC patients who were treated using radiotherapy at our institution between 2009 and 2018. CT and T1 post-contrast MR images along with NCI-CTCAE xerostomia grade (3-month follow-up) were prospectively collected at our institution. CT and MR images were registered on which parotid/submandibular glands were contoured. Image features were extracted for ipsilateral/contralateral parotid and submandibular glands relative to the location of the primary tumor. Dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters were also acquired. Features were pre-selected based on Spearman correlation before modelling by examining the correlation with xerostomia (p?<?0.05). A shrinkage regression analysis of the pre-selected features was performed using LASSO. The internal validity of the variable selection was estimated by repeating the entire variable selection procedure using a leave-one-out-cross-validation. The most frequently selected variables were considered in the final model. A generalized linear regression with repeated ten-fold cross-validation was developed to predict radiation-induced xerostomia at 3-months after radiotherapy. This model was tested in an independent dataset (n?=?50) of patients who were treated at the same institution in 2017-2018. We compared the prediction performances under eight conditions (DVH-only, CT-only, MR-only, CT?+?MR, DVH?+?CT, DVH?+?CT?+?MR, Clinical+CT?+?MR, and Clinical+DVH?+?CT?+?MR) using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC).ResultsAmong extracted features, 7 CT, 5 MR, and 2 DVH features were selected. The internal cohort (n?=?216) ROC-AUC values for DVH, CT, MR, and Clinical+DVH?+?CT?+?MR features were 0.73?±?0.01, 0.69?±?0.01, 0.70?±?0.01, and 0.79?±?0.01, respectively. The validation cohort (n?=?50) ROC-AUC values for DVH, CT, MR, and Clinical+DVH?+?CT?+?MR features were 0.63, 0.57, 0.66, and 0.68, respectively. The DVH-ROC was not significantly different than the CT-ROC (p?=?0.8) or MR-ROC (p?=?0.4). However, the CT?+?MR-ROC was significantly different than the CT-ROC (p?=?0.03), but not the Clinical+DVH?+?CT?+?MR model (p?=?0.5).ConclusionOur results suggest that baseline CT and MR image features may reflect baseline salivary gland function and potential risk for radiation injury. The integration of baseline image features into prediction models has the potential to improve xerostomia risk stratification with the ultimate goal of truly personalized HNC radiotherapy.

Project description:PurposeRadical radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) may deliver significant doses to brain structures. There is evidence that this may cause a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Radiation dose to the medial temporal lobes, and particularly to the hippocampi, seems to be critical in determining NCF outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of two alternative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to generate hippocampus- and brain-sparing HNC treatment plans to preserve NCF.Methods and materialsA planning study was undertaken for ten patients with HNC whose planning target volume (PTV) included the nasopharynx. Patients had been previously treated using standard (chemo)-IMRT techniques. Bilateral hippocampi were delineated according to the RTOG atlas, on T1w MRI co-registered to the RT planning CT. Hippocampus-sparing plans (HSRT), and whole-brain/hippocampus-sparing fixed-field non-coplanar IMRT (BSRT) plans, were generated. DVHs and dose difference maps were used to compare plans. NTCP calculations for NCF impairment, based on hippocampal dosimetry, were performed for all plans.ResultsSignificant reductions in hippocampal doses relative to standard plans were achieved in eight of ten cases for both HSRT and BSRT. EQD2 D40% to bilateral hippocampi was significantly reduced from a mean of 23.5 Gy (range 14.5-35.0) in the standard plans to a mean of 8.6 Gy (4.2-24.7) for HSRT (p = 0.001) and a mean of 9.0 Gy (4.3-17.3) for BSRT (p < 0.001). Both HSRT and BSRT resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the whole brain, brain stem, and cerebellum.ConclusionWe demonstrate that IMRT plans for HNC involving the nasopharynx can be successfully optimised to significantly reduce dose to the bilateral hippocampi and whole brain. The magnitude of the achievable dose reductions results in significant reductions in the probability of radiation-induced NCF decline. These results could readily be translated into a future clinical trial.

Project description:PurposeTo determine whether serial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images taken during head and neck radiation therapy (HNR) can improve chronic xerostomia prediction.Methods and materialsIn a retrospective analysis, parotid glands (PGs) were delineated on daily kV CBCT images using deformable image registration for 119 HNR patients (60 or 70 Gy in 2 Gy fractions over 6 or 7 weeks). Deformable image registration accuracy for a subset of deformed contours was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient and mean distance to agreement in comparison with manually drawn contours. Average weekly changes in CBCT-measured mean Hounsfield unit intensity and volume were calculated for each PG relative to week 1. Dose-volume histogram statistics were extracted from each plan, and interactions among dose, volume, and intensity were investigated. Univariable analysis and penalized logistic regression were used to analyze association with observer-rated xerostomia at 1 year after HNR. Models including CBCT delta imaging features were compared with clinical and dose-volume histogram-only models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for grade ≥1 and grade ≥2 xerostomia prediction.ResultsAll patients experienced end-treatment PG volume reduction with mean (range) ipsilateral and contralateral PG shrinkage of 19.6% (0.9%-58.4%) and 17.7% (4.4%-56.3%), respectively. Midtreatment volume change was highly correlated with mean PG dose (r = -0.318, P < 1e-6). Incidence of grade ≥1 and grade ≥2 xerostomia was 65% and 16%, respectively. For grade ≥1 xerostomia prediction, the delta-imaging model had an AUC of 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.603-0.830), compared with 0.709 (95% CI, 0.603-0.815) for the dose/clinical model. For grade ≥2 xerostomia prediction, the dose/clinical model had an AUC of 0.692 (95% CI, 0.615-0.770), and the addition of contralateral PG changes modestly improved predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.776 (0.643-0.912).ConclusionsThe rate of CBCT-measured PG image feature changes improves prediction over dose alone for chronic xerostomia prediction. Analysis of CBCT images acquired for treatment positioning may provide an inexpensive monitoring system to support toxicity-reducing adaptive radiation therapy.

Project description:BackgroundXerostomia is the most common late side-effect of radiotherapy to the head and neck. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce irradiation of the parotid glands. We assessed the hypothesis that parotid-sparing IMRT reduces the incidence of severe xerostomia.MethodsWe undertook a randomised controlled trial between Jan 21, 2003, and Dec 7, 2007, that compared conventional radiotherapy (control) with parotid-sparing IMRT. We randomly assigned patients with histologically confirmed pharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma (T1-4, N0-3, M0) at six UK radiotherapy centres between the two radiotherapy techniques (1:1 ratio). A dose of 60 or 65 Gy was prescribed in 30 daily fractions given Monday to Friday. Treatment was not masked. Randomisation was by computer-generated permuted blocks and was stratified by centre and tumour site. Our primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with grade 2 or worse xerostomia at 12 months, as assessed by the Late Effects of Normal Tissue (LENT SOMA) scale. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, with all patients who had assessments included. Long-term follow-up of patients is ongoing. This study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, number ISRCTN48243537.Findings47 patients were assigned to each treatment arm. Median follow-up was 44·0 months (IQR 30·0-59·7). Six patients from each group died before 12 months and seven patients from the conventional radiotherapy and two from the IMRT group were not assessed at 12 months. At 12 months xerostomia side-effects were reported in 73 of 82 alive patients; grade 2 or worse xerostomia at 12 months was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the conventional radiotherapy group (25 [74%; 95% CI 56-87] of 34 patients given conventional radiotherapy vs 15 [38%; 23-55] of 39 given IMRT, p=0·0027). The only recorded acute adverse event of grade 2 or worse that differed significantly between the treatment groups was fatigue, which was more prevalent in the IMRT group (18 [41%; 99% CI 23-61] of 44 patients given conventional radiotherapy vs 35 [74%; 55-89] of 47 given IMRT, p=0·0015). At 24 months, grade 2 or worse xerostomia was significantly less common with IMRT than with conventional radiotherapy (20 [83%; 95% CI 63-95] of 24 patients given conventional radiotherapy vs nine [29%; 14-48] of 31 given IMRT; p<0·0001). At 12 and 24 months, significant benefits were seen in recovery of saliva secretion with IMRT compared with conventional radiotherapy, as were clinically significant improvements in dry-mouth-specific and global quality of life scores. At 24 months, no significant differences were seen between randomised groups in non-xerostomia late toxicities, locoregional control, or overall survival.InterpretationSparing the parotid glands with IMRT significantly reduces the incidence of xerostomia and leads to recovery of saliva secretion and improvements in associated quality of life, and thus strongly supports a role for IMRT in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.FundingCancer Research UK (CRUK/03/005).

Dataset Information

Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: beyond sparing the parotid glands.

Publications

Reducing xerostomia after chemo-IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: beyond sparing the parotid glands.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets