Dataset Information

Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We compared retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) bias and imprecision among three spectral-domain optical coherence tomographs (SD-OCT).

Methods

A total of 152 eyes of 83 subjects (96 healthy and 56 glaucomatous eyes) underwent peripapillary RNFL imaging using at least 2 of the following 3 SD-OCT devices on the same day: Cirrus HD-OCT (optic nerve head [ONH]) cube 200 × 200 protocol), RTVue-100 (ONH protocol [12 radial lines and 13 concentric circles]), and 3D OCT-1000 (3D Scan 256 × 256 protocol). Calibration equations, bias and imprecision of RNFL measurements were calculated using structural equation models.

Results

The calibration equations for healthy and glaucoma RNFL thickness measurements among the 3 devices were: Cirrus = 2.136 + 0.831*RTVue; Cirrus = -15.521 + 1.056*3D OCT-1000; RTVue = -21.257 + 1.271*3D OCT-1000. Using Cirrus bias as an arbitrary reference, RTVue bias was 1.20 (95% CI 1.09-1.32, P < 0.05) times larger and 3D OCT-1000 was 0.95 (0.87-1.03, P > 0.05) times smaller. Relative to 3D OCT-1000, the RTVue bias was 1.27 (1.13-1.42, P < 0.05). RTVue imprecision (healthy eyes 7.83, 95% CI 6.43-9.58; glaucoma cases 5.71, 4.19-7.64) was statistically significantly higher than both Cirrus (healthy eyes 3.23, 2.11-4.31; glaucoma cases 3.53, 0.69-5.24) and 3D OCT-1000 (healthy eyes 4.07, 3.11-5.35; glaucoma cases 5.33, 3.77-7.67) in healthy eyes. The imprecision also was significantly higher for RTVue measurements in healthy compared to glaucomatous eyes. None of the other comparisons was statistically significant.

Conclusions

RTVue-100 showed higher imprecision (or higher measurement variability) than Cirrus HD-OCT and 3D OCT-1000 RNFL measurements. Three-dimensional cube scanning with post-hoc data sampling may be a factor reducing imprecision.

SUBMITTER: Buchser NM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3390182 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Buchser Nancy M NM Wollstein Gadi G Ishikawa Hiroshi H Bilonick Richard A RA Ling Yun Y Folio Lindsey S LS Kagemann Larry L Noecker Robert J RJ Albeiruti Eiyass E Schuman Joel S JS

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 20120620 7

<h4>Purpose</h4>We compared retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) bias and imprecision among three spectral-domain optical coherence tomographs (SD-OCT).<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 152 eyes of 83 subjects (96 healthy and 56 glaucomatous eyes) underwent peripapillary RNFL imaging using at least 2 of the following 3 SD-OCT devices on the same day: Cirrus HD-OCT (optic nerve head [ONH]) cube 200 × 200 protocol), RTVue-100 (ONH protocol [12 radial lines and 13 concentric circles]), and 3D OCT-1000 (3D Sca ...[more]

PMID: 22538423

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. DESIGN:Population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS:We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. METHODS:All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. RESULTS:Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 ?m thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from -9.98 to +8.00 ?m. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. CONCLUSIONS:Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.

Dataset Information

Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets