A placebo-controlled randomized trial of warfarin in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Rationale
Animal and human studies support the importance of the coagulation cascade in pulmonary fibrosis.Objectives
In a cohort of subjects with progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), we tested the hypothesis that treatment with warfarin at recognized therapeutic doses would reduce rates of mortality, hospitalization, and declines in FVC.Methods
This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of warfarin targeting an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 in patients with IPF. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to warfarin or matching placebo for a planned treatment period of 48 weeks. International normalized ratios were monitored using encrypted home point-of-care devices that allowed blinding of study therapy.Measurements and main results
The primary outcome measure was the composite outcome of time to death, hospitalization (nonbleeding, nonelective), or a 10% or greater absolute decline in FVC. Due to a low probability of benefit and an increase in mortality observed in the subjects randomized to warfarin (14 warfarin versus 3 placebo deaths; P = 0.005) an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended stopping the study after 145 of the planned 256 subjects were enrolled (72 warfarin, 73 placebo). The mean follow-up was 28 weeks.Conclusions
This study did not show a benefit for warfarin in the treatment of patients with progressive IPF. Treatment with warfarin was associated with an increased risk of mortality in an IPF population who lacked other indications for anticoagulation.
SUBMITTER: Noth I
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3400994 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundGLPG1205 is a selective functional antagonist of G-protein-coupled receptor 84, which plays an important role in fibrotic processes. This study assessed the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GLPG1205 for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).MethodsPINTA (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03725852) was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Patients with IPF were randomised 2:1 to once-daily oral GLPG1205 100 mg or placebo for 26 weeks and stratified to receive GLPG1205 alone or with local standard of care (nintedanib or pirfenidone). The primary end-point was change from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC); other end-points were safety and tolerability, and lung volumes measured by imaging (high-resolution computed tomography). The study was not powered for statistical significance.ResultsIn total, 68 patients received study medication. Least squares mean change from baseline in FVC at week 26 was -33.68 (95% CI -112.0-44.68) mL with GLPG1205 and -76.00 (95% CI -170.7-18.71) mL with placebo (least squares mean difference 42.33 (95% CI -81.84-166.5) mL; p=0.50). Lung volumes by imaging declined -58.30 versus -262.72 mL (whole lung) and -33.68 versus -135.48 mL (lower lobes) with GLPG1205 versus placebo, respectively. Treatment with GLPG1205 versus placebo resulted in higher proportions of serious and severe treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-emergent discontinuations, most apparent with nintedanib.ConclusionsTreatment with GLPG1205 did not result in a significant difference in FVC decline versus placebo. GLPG1205 demonstrated a poorer safety and tolerability profile than placebo.
| S-EPMC9978158 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCough is a common, disabling symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which may be exacerbated by acid reflux. Inhibiting gastric acid secretion could potentially reduce cough. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger, multicentre trial of omeprazole for cough in IPF, to assess safety and to quantify cough.MethodsSingle-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole (20 mg twice daily for 3 months) in patients with IPF. Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and acceptability of trial procedures. The primary clinical outcome was cough frequency.ResultsForty-five participants were randomised (23 to omeprazole, 22 to placebo), with 40 (20 in each group) having cough monitoring before and after treatment. 280 patients were screened to yield these numbers, with barriers to discontinuing antacids the single biggest reason for non-recruitment. Recruitment averaged 1.5 participants per month. Geometric mean cough frequency at the end of treatment, adjusted for baseline, was 39.1% lower (95% CI 66.0% lower to 9.3% higher) in the omeprazole group compared with placebo. Omeprazole was well tolerated and adverse event profiles were similar in both groups, although there was a small excess of lower respiratory tract infection and a small fall in forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity associated with omeprazole.ConclusionsA large randomised controlled trial of PPIs for cough in IPF appears feasible and justified but should address barriers to randomisation and incorporate safety assessments in relation to respiratory infection and changes in lung function.
| S-EPMC6484692 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Rationale: Human herpesviruses Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus are frequently detectable in the lungs of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and could contribute to disease pathogenesis. Objectives: With the goal of inhibiting herpesvirus replication, we tested the safety and tolerability of adding valganciclovir to standard IPF therapy (pirfenidone). Methods: We performed a single-center, Phase I, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing valganciclovir 900 mg daily with placebo in patients with IPF with serologic evidence of prior Epstein-Barr virus and/or cytomegalovirus infection who were tolerating full-dose pirfenidone (2,403 mg/d). Subjects were randomized to valganciclovir or placebo 2:1 for 12 weeks of active treatment with off-treatment follow-up for up to 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was the number of subjects discontinuing the study drug before completing 12 weeks of treatment. Results: Thirty-one subjects with IPF were randomized to valganciclovir (n = 20) or placebo (n = 11). All subjects completed assigned therapy except one subject in the valganciclovir group, who discontinued the study drug after developing a rash. The total number of adverse events was similar between study groups. In a prespecified analysis of secondary physiologic endpoints, we observed a trend toward improved forced vital capacity from randomization to Week 12 in valganciclovir-treated subjects (-10 ml; interquartile range [IQR], -65 to 70 ml) versus placebo-treated subjects (40 ml; IQR, -130 to 60 ml), which persisted through 12 months of follow-up. Conclusions: Valganciclovir is safe and well tolerated as an add-on therapy to pirfenidone in patients with IPF. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02871401).
| S-EPMC8513653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Acetylcysteine has been suggested as a beneficial treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, although data from placebo-controlled studies are lacking.In our initial double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients who had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with mild-to-moderate impairment in pulmonary function to receive a three-drug regimen of prednisone, azathioprine, and acetylcysteine; acetylcysteine alone; or placebo. The study was interrupted owing to safety concerns associated with the three-drug regimen. The trial continued as a two-group study (acetylcysteine vs. placebo) without other changes; 133 and 131 patients were enrolled in the acetylcysteine and placebo groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the change in forced vital capacity (FVC) over a 60-week period.At 60 weeks, there was no significant difference in the change in FVC between the acetylcysteine group and the placebo group (-0.18 liters and -0.19 liters, respectively; P=0.77). In addition, there were no significant differences between the acetylcysteine group and the placebo group in the rates of death (4.9% vs. 2.5%, P=0.30 by the log-rank test) or acute exacerbation (2.3% in each group, P>0.99).As compared with placebo, acetylcysteine offered no significant benefit with respect to the preservation of FVC in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with mild-to-moderate impairment in lung function. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00650091.).
| S-EPMC4116664 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUNDFibrocytes are BM-derived circulating cells that traffic to the injured lungs and contribute to fibrogenesis. The mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus, inhibits fibrocyte CXCR4 expression, reducing fibrocyte traffic and attenuating lung fibrosis in animal models. We sought to test the hypothesis that short-term treatment with sirolimus reduces the concentration of CXCR4+ circulating fibrocytes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).METHODSWe conducted a short-term randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover pilot trial to assess the safety and tolerability of sirolimus in IPF. Participants were randomly assigned to sirolimus or placebo for approximately 6 weeks, and after a 4-week washout, they were assigned to the alternate treatment. Toxicity, lung function, and the concentration of circulating fibrocytes were measured before and after each treatment.RESULTSIn the 28 study participants, sirolimus resulted in a statistically significant 35% decline in the concentration of total fibrocytes, 34% decline in CXCR4+ fibrocytes, and 42% decline in fibrocytes expressing α-smooth muscle actin, but no significant change in these populations occurred on placebo. Respiratory adverse events occurred more frequently during treatment with placebo than sirolimus; the incidence of adverse events and drug tolerability did not otherwise differ during therapy with drug and placebo. Lung function was unaffected by either treatment, with the exception of a small decline in gas transfer during treatment with placebo.CONCLUSIONAs compared with placebo, short-term treatment with sirolimus resulted in reduction of circulating fibrocyte concentrations in participants with IPF, with an acceptable safety profile.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov, accession no. NCT01462006.FUNDINGNIH R01HL098329 and American Heart Association 18TPA34170486.
| S-EPMC10243828 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionChronic cough is a highly problematic symptom for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); limited therapeutic options are available. We evaluated gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of chronic cough in IPF.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study included subjects with IPF. Sequence A included gefapixant 50 mg BID (period 1; 14 days) followed by placebo (period 2; 14 days); sequence B had the opposite sequence of treatments. This regimen was specified in a protocol amendment that modified the original active treatment regimen of gefapixant 50 mg BID for 10 days and 150 mg BID for 4 days. Patients randomized to the original treatment regimen were excluded from efficacy analyses but included in safety assessments. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in awake cough frequency (coughs/hour) from periods 1 and 2 combined. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study.ResultsA total of 51 subjects were randomized, 44 of whom were randomized to treatment sequences evaluated in the primary efficacy analysis (i.e., 22 subjects in sequence A and 22 subjects in sequence B); seven subjects received the treatment assigned before the protocol amendment and were excluded from efficacy analyses. The change from baseline in awake cough frequency from periods 1 and 2 combined (mixed model for repeated measures analysis) did not demonstrate a significant reduction versus placebo in cough at day 14 (p = 0.90); in a post hoc analysis of log-transformed data p value for reduction versus placebo at day 14 was 0.07. The most common AEs were related to taste (dysgeusia and ageusia).ConclusionsGefapixant was generally well tolerated but was not associated with a significant improvement in chronic cough in subjects with IPF as defined by the primary endpoint in this study.Trial registrationNCT02502097.
| S-EPMC8589896 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, may preferentially improve blood flow to well-ventilated regions of the lung in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which could result in improvements in gas exchange. We tested the hypothesis that treatment with sildenafil would improve walk distance, dyspnea, and quality of life in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, defined as a carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of less than 35% of the predicted value.We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sildenafil in two periods. The first period consisted of 12 weeks of a double-blind comparison between sildenafil and a placebo control. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an increase in the 6-minute walk distance of 20% or more. Key secondary outcomes included changes in oxygenation, degree of dyspnea, and quality of life. The second period was a 12-week open-label evaluation involving all patients receiving sildenafil.A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study. The difference in the primary outcome was not significant, with 9 of 89 patients (10%) in the sildenafil group and 6 of 91 (7%) in the placebo group having an improvement of 20% or more in the 6-minute walk distance (P=0.39). There were small but significant differences in arterial oxygenation, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, degree of dyspnea, and quality of life favoring the sildenafil group. Serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups.This study did not show a benefit for sildenafil for the primary outcome. The presence of some positive secondary outcomes creates clinical equipoise for further research. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00517933.)
| S-EPMC3587293 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo assess the acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the quadriceps muscles in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and to identify whether a future definitive trial is feasible.DesignA randomised, parallel, two-group, participant and assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled feasibility trial with embedded qualitative interviews.SettingOutpatient department, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals.ParticipantsTwenty-two people with IPF: median (25th, 75th centiles) age 76 (74, 82) years, forced vital capacity 62 (50, 75) % predicted, 6 min walk test distance 289 (149, 360) m.InterventionsUsual care (home-based exercise, weekly telephone support, breathlessness management leaflet) with either placebo or active NMES for 6 weeks, with follow-up at 6 and 12 weeks.Primary outcome measuresFeasibility of recruitment and retention, treatment uptake and adherence, outcome assessments, participant and outcome assessor blinding and adverse events related to interventions.Secondary outcome measuresOutcome measures with potential to be primary or secondary outcomes in a definitive clinical trial. In addition, purposively sampled participants were interviewed to capture their experiences and acceptability of the trial.ResultsOut of 364 people screened, 23 were recruited: 11 were allocated to each group and one was withdrawn prior to randomisation. Compared with the control group, a greater proportion of the intervention group completed the intervention, remained in the trial blinded to group allocation and experienced intervention-related adverse events. Assessor blinding was maintained. The secondary outcome measures were feasible with most missing data associated with the accelerometer. Small participant numbers precluded identification of an outcome measure suitable for a definitive trial. Qualitative findings demonstrated that trial process and active NMES were acceptable but there were concerns about the credibility of placebo NMES.ConclusionsPrimarily owing to recruitment difficulties, a definitive trial using the current protocol to evaluate NMES in people with IPF is not feasible.Trial registration numberNCT03499275.
| S-EPMC8174518 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and rationaleIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a critical disease with a poor prognosis. Although different studies have been conducted for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, limited treatments are available. Jin-shui Huan-xian granule (JHG), which is a Chinese medicine herbal compound, has shown promising efficacy in reducing frequencies of acute exacerbations, improving exercise capacity the quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JHG for IPF.Subjects and methodsThis is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 312 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients will be enrolled and randomly allocated to one of the two groups with 1:1. After a 2-week washout period, 52-week treatment will also be performed for all the patients. Patients in the experimental group and the control group will be given JHG and JHG placebo, respectively. Outcome measures including acute exacerbations, pulmonary function, dyspnea, exercise capacity, and quality of life will be evaluated in this study.DiscussionBased on our previous study, it is hypothesized that JHG will reduce acute exacerbations; improve exercise capacity, pulmonary function, and quality of life; and delay the disease progression-free. High-level evidence-based support for TCM in IPF will also be obtained in this study.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04187690. Register on December 11, 2019.
| S-EPMC9438282 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The recommendation for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is weak with low-quality evidence. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate short-term PR effects and their maintenance after a 3-month follow-up. Fifty-four IPF patients were randomized into a group receiving a 3-week comprehensive, inpatient PR (n = 34, FVC: 74 ± 19% pred.) or usual care (UC) (n = 17, FVC: 72 ± 20%pred.). Outcomes were measured at baseline (T1), after intervention (T2), and 3 months after T2 (T3). A 6-min walk distance (6MWD) was used as the primary outcome and chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ) scores as the secondary outcome. Change in 6MWD from T1 to T2 (? = 61 m, 95% CI (18.5-102.4), p = 0.006) but not from T1 to T3 (? = 26 m, 95% CI (8.0-61.5), p = 0.16) differed significantly between groups. Higher baseline FVC and higher anxiety symptoms were significant predictors of better short-term 6MWD improvements. For the change in CRQ total score, a significant between-group difference from T1 to T2 (? = 3.0 pts, 95% CI (0.7-5.3), p = 0.01) and from T1 to T3 (? = 3.5 pts, 95% CI (1.5-5.4), p = 0.001) was found in favour of the PR group. To conclude, in addition to the short-term benefits, inpatient PR is effective at inducing medium-term quality of life improvements in IPF. PR in the early stages of the disease seems to provoke the best benefits.
| S-EPMC7290850 | biostudies-literature