Dataset Information

Muscle stimulation in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised placebo-controlled feasibility study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To assess the acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the quadriceps muscles in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and to identify whether a future definitive trial is feasible.

Design

A randomised, parallel, two-group, participant and assessor-blinded, placebo-controlled feasibility trial with embedded qualitative interviews.

Setting

Outpatient department, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals.

Participants

Twenty-two people with IPF: median (25th, 75th centiles) age 76 (74, 82) years, forced vital capacity 62 (50, 75) % predicted, 6 min walk test distance 289 (149, 360) m.

Interventions

Usual care (home-based exercise, weekly telephone support, breathlessness management leaflet) with either placebo or active NMES for 6 weeks, with follow-up at 6 and 12 weeks.

Primary outcome measures

Feasibility of recruitment and retention, treatment uptake and adherence, outcome assessments, participant and outcome assessor blinding and adverse events related to interventions.

Secondary outcome measures

Outcome measures with potential to be primary or secondary outcomes in a definitive clinical trial. In addition, purposively sampled participants were interviewed to capture their experiences and acceptability of the trial.

Results

Out of 364 people screened, 23 were recruited: 11 were allocated to each group and one was withdrawn prior to randomisation. Compared with the control group, a greater proportion of the intervention group completed the intervention, remained in the trial blinded to group allocation and experienced intervention-related adverse events. Assessor blinding was maintained. The secondary outcome measures were feasible with most missing data associated with the accelerometer. Small participant numbers precluded identification of an outcome measure suitable for a definitive trial. Qualitative findings demonstrated that trial process and active NMES were acceptable but there were concerns about the credibility of placebo NMES.

Conclusions

Primarily owing to recruitment difficulties, a definitive trial using the current protocol to evaluate NMES in people with IPF is not feasible.

Trial registration number

NCT03499275.

SUBMITTER: Nolan CM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8174518 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesLow-frequency electrical muscle stimulation (LF-EMS) may have the potential to reduce breathlessness and increase exercise capacity in the chronic heart failure population who struggle to adhere to conventional exercise. The study's aim was to establish if a randomised controlled trial of LF-EMS was feasible.Design and settingDouble blind (participants, outcome assessors), randomised study in a secondary care outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme.ParticipantsPatients with severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III-IV) having left ventricular ejection fraction <40% documented by echocardiography were eligible.InterventionsParticipants were randomised (remotely by computer) to 8 weeks (5×60 mins per week) of either LF-EMS intervention (4 Hz, continuous, n=30) or sham placebo (skin level stimulation only, n=30) of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles. Participants used the LF-EMS straps at home and were supervised weekly OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, adherence and tolerability to the intervention were measured during the trial as well as physiological outcomes (primary outcome: 6 min walk, secondary outcomes: quadriceps strength, quality of life and physical activity).ResultsSixty of 171 eligible participants (35.08%) were recruited to the trial. 12 (20%) of the 60 patients (4 LF-EMS and 8 sham) withdrew. Forty-one patients (68.3%), adhered to the protocol for at least 70% of the sessions. The physiological measures indicated no significant differences between groups in 6 min walk distance(p=0.13) and quality of life (p=0.55) although both outcomes improved more with LF-EMS.ConclusionPatients with severe heart failure can be recruited to and tolerate LF-EMS studies. A larger randomised controlled trial (RCT) in the advanced heart failure population is technically feasible, although adherence to follow-up would be challenging. The preliminary improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life were minimal and this should be considered if planning a larger trial.Trial registration numberISRCTN16749049.

Project description:BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is an age-related, chronic, irreversible fibrotic lung disease. IPF is associated with increased senescent cells burden, which may be alleviated with administration of senescent cell targeting drugs termed 'senolytics'. We previously conducted an open-label single-arm pilot study of the senolytic combination of dasatinib and quercetin (D + Q) in patients with IPF but lack of control group limited interpretation and next-stage trial planning. The primary objective of this confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial (RCT; NCT02874989) was to report adverse events with D + Q and inform study feasibility for future efficacy trials.MethodsTwelve participants with IPF aged >50 years were blinded and randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either receive three weeks of D + Q (D: 100 mg/d and Q: 1250 mg/d, three consecutive days per week) or matching placebo.FindingsAll participants completed the scheduled drug dosing regimen (108/108 doses) and planned assessments (60/60). While the placebo arm reported fewer overall non-serious AEs (65 vs 22), there were no serious adverse events related to D + Q. Most AEs in the D + Q arm are common in IPF patients or anticipated side effects of D. Sleep disturbances and anxiety were disproportionately represented in the D + Q arm (4/6 vs 0/6). Frailty, pulmonary, or physical function were explored before and after intermittent D + Q; though under-powered to evaluate change, these measures do not appear to differ meaningfully between groups.InterpretationIntermittently-dosed D + Q in patients with IPF is feasible and generally well-tolerated. Further prospective studies, such as a larger RCT, are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of D + Q in patients with IPF.FundingThis work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R33AG61456 (JLK, TT), Robert and Arlene Kogod (JLK, TT), the Connor Fund (JLK, TT), Robert J. and Theresa W. Ryan (JLK, TT), and the Noaber Foundation (JLK, TT) San Antonio Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center's (OAIC)Pilot/Exploratory Studies Core (PESC) Grant (AMN, NM); NIHK01 AG059837 (JNJ), P30 AG021332 (SBK, JNJ); NIHR37 AG013925 (JLK), the Connor Group (JLK), Glenn/AFAR BIG Award (JLK), Robert J. and Theresa W. Ryan (JLK), and the Noaber and Ted Nash Long Life Foundations (JLK).