Dataset Information

Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review.

ABSTRACT: We conducted an evidence-based review of information about [corrected] amniotic fluid embolism (AFE). The estimated incidence of AFE is 1:15,200 and 1:53,800 deliveries in North America and Europe, respectively. The case fatality rate and perinatal mortality associated with AFE are 13-30% and 9-44%, respectively. Risk factors associated with an [corrected] increased risk of AFE include advanced maternal age, placental abnormalities, operative deliveries, eclampsia, polyhydramnios, cervical lacerations, [corrected] and uterine rupture. The hemodynamic response in [corrected] AFE is biphasic, with initial pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure, followed by left ventricular failure. Promising therapies include selective pulmonary vasodilators and recombinant activated factor VIIa. Important topics for future research are presented.

SUBMITTER: Conde-Agudelo A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3401570 | biostudies-literature | 2009 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review.

Conde-Agudelo Agustín A Romero Roberto R

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 20091101 5

We conducted an evidence-based review of information about [corrected] amniotic fluid embolism (AFE). The estimated incidence of AFE is 1:15,200 and 1:53,800 deliveries in North America and Europe, respectively. The case fatality rate and perinatal mortality associated with AFE are 13-30% and 9-44%, respectively. Risk factors associated with an [corrected] increased risk of AFE include advanced maternal age, placental abnormalities, operative deliveries, eclampsia, polyhydramnios, cervical lacer ...[more]

PMID: 19879393

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAmniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is an uncommon pregnancy complication but is associated with high maternal mortality. Because of the rarity of AFE, associated risks factors and maternal outcomes have been relatively understudied.ObjectiveTo examine the clinical, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics and the maternal outcomes related to AFE in a recent period in the US.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study examined hospital deliveries from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was clinical, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics of AFE, assessed with a multivariable binary logistic regression model. The coprimary outcome was failure to rescue, defined as maternal mortality after AFE. Associations with other severe maternal morbidity indicators and failure to rescue per clinical and pregnancy characteristics were also assessed.ResultsA total of 14 684 135 deliveries were examined, with AFE diagnosed in 880 women, corresponding to an incidence rate of 6.0 per 100 000 deliveries. The cohort-level median patient age was 29 years (IQR, 25-33 years). In a multivariable analysis, (1) patient factors of older age, Asian and Black race, Western US region, pregestational hypertension, asthma, illicit substance use, and grand multiparity; (2) pregnancy factors of placental accreta spectrum (PAS), placental abruption, uterine rupture, polyhydramnios, chorioamnionitis, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and fetal demise; and (3) delivery factors of early gestational age, cervical ripening, cesarean delivery, operative delivery, and manual removal were associated with AFE. Among these characteristics, PAS had the largest association with AFE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 10.01; 95% CI, 7.03-14.24). When stratified by the PAS subtypes, more severe forms of PAS had a greater association with AFE (aOR for increta and percreta, 17.35; 95% CI, 10.21-28.48; and aOR for accreta, 7.62; 95% CI, 4.83-12.01). Patients who had AFE were more likely to have coagulopathy (aOR, 24.68; 95% CI, 19.38-31.44), cardiac arrest (aOR, 24.56; 95% CI, 17.84-33.81), and adult respiratory distress syndrome (aOR, 10.72; 95% CI, 8.09-14.20). The failure-to-rescue rate after AFE was 17.0% overall. However, the failure-to-rescue rate exceeded 30% when AFE co-occurred with other severe maternal morbidity indicators: 45.8% for AFE, cardiac arrest, and coagulopathy; 43.2% for AFE, shock, and cardiac rhythm conversion; and 38.6% for AFE, cardiac arrest, coagulopathy, and shock. The failure-to-rescue rate after AFE also exceeded 30% when AFE occurred in the setting of placental pathology: 42.9% for AFE and PAS and 31.3% for AFE and placental abruption.Conclusions and relevanceThis contemporaneous, national-level analysis validated previously known risk factors for AFE and confirmed the dismal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by AFE. The association between PAS and AFE, which was not previously reported, warrants further investigation.

Project description:BackgroundAmniotic fluid embolism (AFE) remains one of the principal reported causes of direct maternal mortality in high-income countries. However, obtaining robust information about the condition is challenging because of its rarity and its difficulty to diagnose. This study aimed to pool data from multiple countries in order to describe risk factors, management, and outcomes of AFE and to explore the impact on the findings of considering United Kingdom, international, and United States AFE case definitions.Methods and findingsA population-based cohort and nested case-control study was conducted using the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS). Secondary data on women with AFE (n = 99-218, depending on case definition) collected prospectively in population-based studies conducted in Australia, France, the Netherlands, Slovakia, and the UK were pooled along with secondary data on a sample of control women (n = 4,938) collected in Australia and the UK. Risk factors for AFE were investigated by comparing the women with AFE in Australia and the UK with the control women identified in these countries using logistic regression. Factors associated with poor maternal outcomes (fatality and composite of fatality or permanent neurological injury) amongst women with AFE from each of the countries were investigated using logistic regression or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The estimated incidence of AFE ranged from 0.8-1.8 per 100,000 maternities, and the proportion of women with AFE who died or had permanent neurological injury ranged from 30%-41%, depending on the case definition. However, applying different case definitions did not materially alter findings regarding risk factors for AFE and factors associated with poor maternal outcomes amongst women with AFE. Using the most liberal case definition (UK) and adjusting for the severity of presentation when appropriate, women who died were more likely than those who survived to present with cardiac arrest (89% versus 40%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.93-28.48, p < 0.001) and less likely to have a source of concentrated fibrinogen (40% versus 56%, aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.92, p = 0.029) or platelets given (24% versus 49%, aOR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.52, p < 0.001). They also had a lower dose of tranexamic acid (median dose 0.7 g versus 2 g, p = 0.035) and were less likely to have had an obstetrician and/or anaesthetist present at the time of the AFE (61% versus 75%, aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.90, p = 0.027). Limitations of the study include limited statistical power to examine factors associated with poor maternal outcome and the potential for residual confounding or confounding by indication.ConclusionsThe findings of our study suggest that when an AFE is suspected, initial supportive obstetric care is important, but having an obstetrician and/or anaesthetist present at the time of the AFE event and use of interventions to correct coagulopathy, including the administration of an adequate dose of tranexamic acid, may be important to improve maternal outcome. Future research should focus on early detection of the coagulation deficiencies seen in AFE alongside the role of tranexamic acid and other coagulopathy management strategies.

Project description:ContextUpper airway suctioning at birth was considered standard procedure and is still commonly practiced. Negative effects could exceed benefits of suction.QuestionIn infants born through clear amniotic fluid (P) does suctioning of the mouth and nose (I) vs no suctioning (C) improve outcomes (O).Data sourcesInformation specialist conducted literature search (12th September 2021, re-run 17th June 2022) using Medline, Embase, Cochrane Databases, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and CINAHL. RCTs, non-RCTs and observational studies with a defined selection strategy were included. Unpublished studies, reviews, editorials, animal and manikin studies were excluded.Data extractionTwo authors independently extracted data, risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Certainty of evidence was assed using the GRADE framework. Review Manager was used to analyse data and GRADEPro to develop summary of evidence tables. Meta-analyses were performed if ≥2 RCTs were available.OutcomesPrimary: assisted ventilation. Secondary: advanced resuscitation, oxygen supplementation, adverse effects of suctioning, unanticipated NICU admission.ResultsNine RCTs (n = 1096) and 2 observational studies (n = 418) were identified. Two RCTs (n = 280) with data concerns were excluded post-hoc. Meta-analysis of 3 RCTs, (n = 702) showed no difference in primary outcome. Two RCTs (n = 200) and 2 prospective observational studies (n = 418) found lower oxygen saturations in first 10 minutes of life with suctioning. Two RCTs (n = 200) showed suctioned newborns took longer to achieve target saturations.LimitationsCertainty of evidence was low or very low for all outcomes. Most studies selected healthy newborns limiting generalisability and insufficient data was available for planned subgroup analyses.ConclusionsDespite low certainty evidence, this review suggests no clinical benefit from suctioning clear amniotic fluid from infants following birth, with some evidence suggesting a resulting desaturation. These finding support current guideline recommendations that this practice is not used as a routine step in birth.FundingThe International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation provided access to software platforms, an information specialist and teleconferencing.Clinical trial registrationThis systematic review was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) (identifier: CRD42021286258).

Dataset Information

Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review.

Publications

Amniotic fluid embolism: an evidence-based review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets