Dataset Information

Global Partial Likelihood for Nonparametric Proportional Hazards Models.

ABSTRACT: As an alternative to the local partial likelihood method of Tibshirani and Hastie and Fan, Gijbels, and King, a global partial likelihood method is proposed to estimate the covariate effect in a nonparametric proportional hazards model, ?(t|x) = exp{?(x)}?(0)(t). The estimator, ??(x), reduces to the Cox partial likelihood estimator if the covariate is discrete. The estimator is shown to be consistent and semiparametrically efficient for linear functionals of ?(x). Moreover, Breslow-type estimation of the cumulative baseline hazard function, using the proposed estimator ??(x), is proved to be efficient. The asymptotic bias and variance are derived under regularity conditions. Computation of the estimator involves an iterative but simple algorithm. Extensive simulation studies provide evidence supporting the theory. The method is illustrated with the Stanford heart transplant data set. The proposed global approach is also extended to a partially linear proportional hazards model and found to provide efficient estimation of the slope parameter. This article has the supplementary materials online.

SUBMITTER: Chen K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3404854 | biostudies-literature | 2010 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Global Partial Likelihood for Nonparametric Proportional Hazards Models.

Chen Kani K Guo Shaojun S Sun Liuquan L Wang Jane-Ling JL

Journal of the American Statistical Association 20100101 490

As an alternative to the local partial likelihood method of Tibshirani and Hastie and Fan, Gijbels, and King, a global partial likelihood method is proposed to estimate the covariate effect in a nonparametric proportional hazards model, λ(t|x) = exp{ψ(x)}λ(0)(t). The estimator, ψ̂(x), reduces to the Cox partial likelihood estimator if the covariate is discrete. The estimator is shown to be consistent and semiparametrically efficient for linear functionals of ψ(x). Moreover, Breslow-type estimati ...[more]

PMID: 22844168

Similar Datasets

Project description:Variable selection and penalized regression models in high-dimension settings have become an increasingly important topic in many disciplines. For instance, omics data are generated in biomedical researches that may be associated with survival of patients and suggest insights into disease dynamics to identify patients with worse prognosis and to improve the therapy. Analysis of high-dimensional time-to-event data in the presence of competing risks requires special modeling techniques. So far, some attempts have been made to variable selection in low- and high-dimension competing risk setting using partial likelihood-based procedures. In this paper, a weighted likelihood-based penalized approach is extended for direct variable selection under the subdistribution hazards model for high-dimensional competing risk data. The proposed method which considers a larger class of semiparametric regression models for the subdistribution allows for taking into account time-varying effects and is of particular importance, because the proportional hazards assumption may not be valid in general, especially in the high-dimension setting. Also, this model relaxes from the constraint of the ability to simultaneously model multiple cumulative incidence functions using the Fine and Gray approach. The performance/effectiveness of several penalties including minimax concave penalty (MCP); adaptive LASSO and smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) as well as their L2 counterparts were investigated through simulation studies in terms of sensitivity/specificity. The results revealed that sensitivity of all penalties were comparable, but the MCP and MCP-L2 penalties outperformed the other methods in term of selecting less noninformative variables. The practical use of the model was investigated through the analysis of genomic competing risk data obtained from patients with bladder cancer and six genes of CDC20, NCF2, SMARCAD1, RTN4, ETFDH, and SON were identified using all the methods and were significantly correlated with the subdistribution.

Project description:BackgroundThe successful identification of breast cancer (BRCA) prognostic biomarkers is essential for the strategic interference of BRCA patients. Recently, various methods have been proposed for exploring a small prognostic gene set that can distinguish the high-risk group from the low-risk group.MethodsRegularized Cox proportional hazards (RCPH) models were proposed to discover prognostic biomarkers of BRCA from gene expression data. Firstly, the maximum connected network with 1142 genes by mapping 956 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 677 previously BRCA-related genes into the gene regulatory network (GRN) was constructed. Then, the 72 union genes of the four feature gene sets identified by Lasso-RCPH, Enet-RCPH, [Formula: see text]-RCPH and SCAD-RCPH models were recognized as the robust prognostic biomarkers. These biomarkers were validated by literature checks, BRCA-specific GRN and functional enrichment analysis. Finally, an index of prognostic risk score (PRS) for BRCA was established based on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Survival analysis was performed to investigate the PRS on 1080 BRCA patients from the internal validation. Particularly, the nomogram was constructed to express the relationship between PRS and other clinical information on the discovery dataset. The PRS was also verified on 1848 BRCA patients of ten external validation datasets or collected cohorts.ResultsThe nomogram highlighted that the importance of PRS in guiding significance for the prognosis of BRCA patients. In addition, the PRS of 301 normal samples and 306 tumor samples from five independent datasets showed that it is significantly higher in tumors than in normal tissues ([Formula: see text]). The protein expression profiles of the three genes, i.e., ADRB1, SAV1 and TSPAN14, involved in the PRS model demonstrated that the latter two genes are more strongly stained in tumor specimens. More importantly, external validation illustrated that the high-risk group has worse survival than the low-risk group ([Formula: see text]) in both internal and external validations.ConclusionsThe proposed pipelines of detecting and validating prognostic biomarker genes for BRCA are effective and efficient. Moreover, the proposed PRS is very promising as an important indicator for judging the prognosis of BRCA patients.

Dataset Information

Global Partial Likelihood for Nonparametric Proportional Hazards Models.

Publications

Global Partial Likelihood for Nonparametric Proportional Hazards Models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets