Dataset Information

Contributions of muscles to mediolateral ground reaction force over a range of walking speeds.

ABSTRACT: Impaired control of mediolateral body motion during walking is an important health concern. Developing treatments to improve mediolateral control is challenging, partly because the mechanisms by which muscles modulate mediolateral ground reaction force (and thereby modulate mediolateral acceleration of the body mass center) during unimpaired walking are poorly understood. To investigate this, we examined mediolateral ground reaction forces in eight unimpaired subjects walking at four speeds and determined the contributions of muscles, gravity, and velocity-related forces to the mediolateral ground reaction force by analyzing muscle-driven simulations of these subjects. During early stance (0-6% gait cycle), peak ground reaction force on the leading foot was directed laterally and increased significantly (p<0.05) with walking speed. During early single support (14-30% gait cycle), peak ground reaction force on the stance foot was directed medially and increased significantly (p<0.01) with speed. Muscles accounted for more than 92% of the mediolateral ground reaction force over all walking speeds, whereas gravity and velocity-related forces made relatively small contributions. Muscles coordinate mediolateral acceleration via an interplay between the medial ground reaction force contributed by the abductors and the lateral ground reaction forces contributed by the knee extensors, plantarflexors, and adductors. Our findings show how muscles that contribute to forward progression and body-weight support also modulate mediolateral acceleration of the body mass center while weight is transferred from one leg to another during double support.

SUBMITTER: John CT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3438315 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Contributions of muscles to mediolateral ground reaction force over a range of walking speeds.

John Chand T CT Seth Ajay A Schwartz Michael H MH Delp Scott L SL

Journal of biomechanics 20120809 14

Impaired control of mediolateral body motion during walking is an important health concern. Developing treatments to improve mediolateral control is challenging, partly because the mechanisms by which muscles modulate mediolateral ground reaction force (and thereby modulate mediolateral acceleration of the body mass center) during unimpaired walking are poorly understood. To investigate this, we examined mediolateral ground reaction forces in eight unimpaired subjects walking at four speeds and ...[more]

PMID: 22884038

Similar Datasets

Project description:PURPOSE:The association between lower-extremity loading and clinically relevant knee symptoms at different time points after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) from walking was compared between individuals with and without clinically relevant knee symptoms in three cohorts: <12 months post-ACLR, 12-24 months post-ACLR, and >24 months post-ACLR. METHODS:One hundred twenty-eight individuals with unilateral ACLR were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic, based on previously defined cutoff values for the Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score (<12 months post-ACLR [symptomatic n = 28, asymptomatic n = 24]; 12-24 months post-ACLR [symptomatic n = 15, asymptomatic n = 15], and >24 months post-ACLR [symptomatic, n = 13; asymptomatic, n = 33]). Vertical ground reaction force exerted on the ACLR limb was collected during walking gait, and functional analyses of variance were used to evaluate the effects of symptoms and time post-ACLR on vGRF throughout stance phase (? = 0.05). RESULTS:Symptomatic individuals, <12 months post-ACLR, demonstrated less vGRF during both vGRF peaks (i.e., weight acceptance and propulsion) and greater vGRF during midstance, compared to asymptomatic individuals. Vertical ground reaction force characteristics were not different between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals for most of stance in individuals between 12 and 24 months post-ACLR. Symptomatic individuals who were >24 months post-ACLR, exhibited greater vGRF during both peaks, but lesser vGRF during midstance, compared to asymptomatic individuals. CONCLUSION:Relative to asymptomatic individuals, symptomatic individuals are more likely to underload the ACLR limb early after ACLR (i.e., <12 months) during both vGRF peaks, but overload the ACLR limb, during both vGRF peaks, at later time points (i.e., >24 months). We propose these differences in lower-extremity loading during walking might have implications for long-term knee health, and should be considered when designing therapeutic interventions for individuals with an ACLR.

Project description:The muscles surrounding the ankle, knee and hip joints provide 42, 16 and 42%, respectively, of the total leg positive power required to walk on level ground at various speeds. However, each joint's contribution to leg work when walking up/downhill at a range of speeds is not known. Determining each biological joint's contribution to leg work over a range of speeds and slopes can inform the design of biomimetic assistive devices (i.e. prostheses). Twenty healthy adults walked 1.00, 1.25 and 1.50 m s-1 on 0°, ±3°, ±6° and ±9° while we collected kinematic and kinetic data. We calculated sagittal plane joint work and individual leg work over the entire stance phase. The ratio of ankle joint to total individual leg positive work (summed ankle, knee and hip joint work) did not change (0.42) with speed or slope, but the ratio of ankle joint to individual leg negative work was 0.38 at -9°, 0.42 at 0° and 0.27 at +9° across all speeds. The ratio of ankle joint to total individual leg negative work was 0.41 at 1.00 m s-1 and 0.32 at 1.50 m s-1 across all slopes. The ratio of knee joint to total individual positive leg work (0.22) did not change with speed or slope. The ratio of knee joint to total individual leg negative work was 0.39 at 1.00 m s-1 and 0.45 at 1.50 m s-1 across all slopes. The ratio of hip joint to total individual leg positive work did not change with speed but was 0.34 at -9°, 0.33 at 0° and 0.37 at +9° across all speeds. The ratio of hip joint to total individual leg negative work was 0.21 at 1.00 m s-1, and 0.24 at 1.50 m s-1 across all slopes and 0.17 at -9°, 0.19 at 0° and 0.29 at +9° across all speeds. The ankle significantly contributes to walking on slopes and this contribution changes during sloped compared with level-ground walking, thus assistive devices that provide biomimetic ankle function must adapt to accommodate walking at different speeds and slopes; whereas assistive biomimetic devices for the knee only need to adapt at different speeds.

Dataset Information

Contributions of muscles to mediolateral ground reaction force over a range of walking speeds.

Publications

Contributions of muscles to mediolateral ground reaction force over a range of walking speeds.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets