Dataset Information

The vascularized fibular graft in precollapse osteonecrosis: is long-term hip preservation possible?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating condition affecting primarily young patients. Free vascularized fibular grafting (FVFG) may provide a durable means to preserve the femoral head. When used in the precollapse stages of ONFH, this treatment may alter the course of disease.

Questions/purposes

We asked: (1) In what percentage of patients does FVFG preserve the femoral head beyond 10 years? (2) When long-term preservation is not achieved, what is the duration of femoral head preservation? (3) Do demographic or etiologic factors predict FVFG survivorship? (4) What long-term improvements in function and activity can be anticipated?

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 61 patients (65 hips) who underwent FVFG for precollapse ONFH. We calculated graft survivorship, SF-12 scores, activity levels, and Harris hip scores. Minimum followup was 10.5 years (mean, 14.4 years; range, 10.5-26 years). Results Forty-nine of 65 hips (75%) had surviving FVFG for at least 10 years. At last followup, 39 of 65 hips (60%) had surviving FVFG, with a mean graft survival time of 15 years (range, 10.5-26.1 years). Twenty-six of the 65 hips with FVFG (40%) underwent conversion to THA at a mean of 8 years postoperatively. Demographic factors, lesion size, additional procedures, and low preoperative function were not associated with changes in graft survivorship. Pain and function were similar in patients with surviving FVFG and patients who had conversion to THA. Patients with surviving FVFG were more likely to engage in impact sports or active events than were patients who had conversion to THA.

Conclusions

When patients with precollapse ONFH undergo FVFG, the majority have preservation of the hip lasting for greater than 10 years with low levels of pain and reasonable function. In patients who ultimately undergo conversion surgery to THA, the mean duration of hip preservation before conversion is 8 years. We continue to use FVFG for treating patients younger than 50 years with symptomatic, precollapse ONFH.

Level of evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

SUBMITTER: Eward WC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3441996 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFree vascularized fibula graft (FVFG) techniques have most consistently demonstrated beneficial effects in young patients diagnosed with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (NONFH), and the core track technique (CTT) in particular is the most commonly used technique. As an alternative to CTT, the modified light bulb technique (LBT) has been reported to have a higher success rate. However, its biomechanical outcomes are poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of modified LBT with those of CTT in treating NONFH.MethodsTwo types (C1 and C2) of NONFH finite element models were established on the basis of a healthy subject and the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification system, and the CTT and LBT procedures were simulated in each type of model. The average von Mises stresses and stiffness of the proximal femur were calculated by applying a load of 250% of the body weight on the femoral head to simulate walking conditions. In addition, two patient-specific models were built and simulated under the same boundary conditions to further validate the LBT.ResultsIn the healthy subject-derived models, both the LBT and CTT resulted in reduced stresses in the weight-bearing area, central femoral head, femoral neck, and trochanteric and subtrochanteric regions and increased structural stiffness after surgery. In the weight-bearing area, the CTT reduced the stress more than the LBT did (36.19% vs 31.45%) for type C1 NONFH and less than the LBT did (23.63% vs 26.76%) for type C2 NONFH. In the patient-specific models, the stiffness and stresses also increased and decreased, respectively, from before to after surgery, which is consistent with the results of healthy subject-derived models.ConclusionThe biomechanical effects of the LBT and CTT differ by the JIC type of NONFH. In terms of preventing the collapse of the femoral head, the LBT may be more effective for JIC type C2 NONFH and may be a suitable alternative to the CTT, while for JIC type C1 NONFH, the CTT is still a better choice. Both techniques can improve the biomechanical properties of NONFH by reducing the proximal femoral stress and increasing the structural stiffness.

Project description:Genomics and molecular imaging, along with clinical and translational research have transformed biomedical science into a data-intensive scientific endeavor. For researchers to benefit from Big Data sets, developing long-term biomedical digital data preservation strategy is very important. In this opinion article, we discuss specific actions that researchers and institutions can take to make research data a continued resource even after research projects have reached the end of their lifecycle. The actions involve utilizing an Open Archival Information System model comprised of six functional entities: Ingest, Access, Data Management, Archival Storage, Administration and Preservation Planning. We believe that involvement of data stewards early in the digital data life-cycle management process can significantly contribute towards long term preservation of biomedical data. Developing data collection strategies consistent with institutional policies, and encouraging the use of common data elements in clinical research, patient registries and other human subject research can be advantageous for data sharing and integration purposes. Specifically, data stewards at the onset of research program should engage with established repositories and curators to develop data sustainability plans for research data. Placing equal importance on the requirements for initial activities (e.g., collection, processing, storage) with subsequent activities (data analysis, sharing) can improve data quality, provide traceability and support reproducibility. Preparing and tracking data provenance, using common data elements and biomedical ontologies are important for standardizing the data description, making the interpretation and reuse of data easier. The Big Data biomedical community requires scalable platform that can support the diversity and complexity of data ingest modes (e.g. machine, software or human entry modes). Secure virtual workspaces to integrate and manipulate data, with shared software programs (e.g., bioinformatics tools), can facilitate the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable) use of data for near- and long-term research needs.