Dataset Information

Identifying the lowest effective dose of acetazolamide for the prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness: systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of three different daily doses of acetazolamide in the prevention of acute mountain sickness and to determine the lowest effective dose.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

Medline and Embase along with a hand search of selected bibliographies. No language restrictions were applied.

Study selection

Randomised controlled trials assessing the use of acetazolamide at 250 mg, 500 mg, or 750 mg daily versus placebo in adults as a drug intervention for the prophylaxis of acute mountain sickness. Included studies were required to state the administered dose of acetazolamide and to randomise participants before ascent to either acetazolamide or placebo. Two reviewers independently carried out the selection process.

Data extraction

Two reviewers extracted data concerning study methods, pharmacological intervention with acetazolamide, method of assessment of acute mountain sickness, and event rates in both control and intervention groups, which were verified and analysed by the review team collaboratively.

Data synthesis

11 studies (with 12 interventions arms) were included in the review. Acetazolamide at doses of 250 mg, 500 mg, and 750 mg were all effective in preventing acute mountain sickness above 3000 m, with a combined odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.46). At a dose of 250 mg daily the number needed to treat for acetazolamide to prevent acute mountain sickness was 6 (95% confidence interval 5 to 11). Heterogeneity ranged from I(2)=0% (500 mg subgroup) to I(2)=44% (750 mg subgroup).

Conclusions

Acetazolamide in doses of 250 mg, 500 mg, and 750 mg daily are all more effective than placebo for preventing acute mountain sickness. Acetazolamide 250 mg daily is the lowest effective dose to prevent acute mountain sickness for which evidence is available.

SUBMITTER: Low EV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3475644 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to determine whether and how the combination of acetazolamide and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduced the incidence and severity of acute mountain sickness (AMS).MethodsThis is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study involving 250 healthy volunteers. Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to following five groups: Ripc (RIPC twice daily, 6 days), Rapid-Ripc (RIPC four times daily, 3 days), Acetazolamide (twice daily, 2 days), Combined (Acetazolamide plus Rapid-Ripc), and Control group. After interventions, participants entered a normobaric hypoxic chamber (equivalent to 4000 m) and stayed for 6 h. The primary outcomes included the incidence and severity of AMS, and SpO2 after hypoxic exposure. Secondary outcomes included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate after hypoxic exposure. The mechanisms of the combined regime were investigated through exploratory outcomes, including analysis of venous blood gas, complete blood count, human cytokine antibody array, ELISA validation for PDGF-AB, and detection of PDGF gene polymorphisms.ResultsThe combination of acetazolamide and RIPC exhibited powerful efficacy in preventing AMS, reducing the incidence of AMS from 26.0 to 6.0% (Combined vs Control: RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.70, P = 0.006), without significantly increasing the incidence of adverse reactions. Combined group also showed the lowest AMS score (0.92 ± 1.10). Mechanistically, acetazolamide induced a mild metabolic acidosis (pH 7.30 ~ 7.31; HCO3- 18.1 ~ 20.8 mmol/L) and improved SpO2 (89 ~ 91%) following hypoxic exposure. Additionally, thirty differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) related to immune-inflammatory process were identified after hypoxia, among which PDGF-AB was involved. Further validation of PDGF-AB in all individuals showed that both acetazolamide and RIPC downregulated PDGF-AB before hypoxic exposure, suggesting a possible protective mechanism. Furthermore, genetic analyses demonstrated that individuals carrying the PDGFA rs2070958 C allele, rs9690350 G allele, or rs1800814 G allele did not display a decrease in PDGF-AB levels after interventions, and were associated with a higher risk of AMS.ConclusionsThe combination of acetazolamide and RIPC exerts a powerful anti-hypoxic effect and represents an innovative and promising strategy for rapid ascent to high altitudes. Acetazolamide improves oxygen saturation. RIPC further aids acetazolamide, which synergistically regulates PDGF-AB, potentially involved in the pathogenesis of AMS.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05023941.

Project description:Individuals sojourning at high altitude (≥2,500m) often develop acute mountain sickness (AMS). However, substantial unexplained inter-individual variability in AMS severity exists. Untargeted metabolomics assays are increasingly used to identify novel biomarkers of susceptibility to illness, and to elucidate biological pathways linking environmental exposures to health outcomes. This study used untargeted nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomics to identify urine metabolites associated with AMS severity during high altitude sojourn. Following a 21-day stay at sea level (SL; 55m), 17 healthy males were transported to high altitude (HA; 4,300m) for a 22-day sojourn. AMS symptoms measured twice daily during the first 5days at HA were used to dichotomize participants according to AMS severity: moderate/severe AMS (AMS; n=11) or no/mild AMS (NoAMS; n=6). Urine samples collected on SL day 12 and HA days 1 and 18 were analyzed using proton NMR tools and the data were subjected to multivariate analyses. The SL urinary metabolite profiles were significantly different (p≤0.05) between AMS vs. NoAMS individuals prior to high altitude exposure. Differentially expressed metabolites included elevated levels of creatine and acetylcarnitine, and decreased levels of hypoxanthine and taurine in the AMS vs. NoAMS group. In addition, the levels of two amino acid derivatives (4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate and N-methylhistidine) and two unidentified metabolites (doublet peaks at 3.33ppm and a singlet at 8.20ppm) were significantly different between groups at SL. By HA day 18, the differences in urinary metabolites between AMS and NoAMS participants had largely resolved. Pathway analysis of these differentially expressed metabolites indicated that they directly or indirectly play a role in energy metabolism. These observations suggest that alterations in energy metabolism before high altitude exposure may contribute to AMS susceptibility at altitude. If validated in larger cohorts, these markers could inform development of a non-invasive assay to screen individuals for AMS susceptibility prior to high altitude sojourn.