Dataset Information

Exercise for people in early- or mid-stage Parkinson disease: a 16-month randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT: Exercise confers short-term benefits for individuals with Parkinson disease (PD).The purpose of the study was to compare short- and long-term responses among 2 supervised exercise programs and a home-based control exercise program.The 16-month randomized controlled exercise intervention investigated 3 exercise approaches: flexibility/balance/function exercise (FBF), supervised aerobic exercise (AE), and home-based exercise (control).This study was conducted in outpatient clinics.The participants were 121 individuals with PD (Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-3).The FBF program (individualized spinal and extremity flexibility exercises followed by group balance/functional training) was supervised by a physical therapist. The AE program (using a treadmill, bike, or elliptical trainer) was supervised by an exercise trainer. Supervision was provided 3 days per week for 4 months, and then monthly (16 months total). The control group participants exercised at home using the National Parkinson Foundation Fitness Counts program, with 1 supervised, clinic-based group session per month.Outcomes, obtained by blinded assessors, were determined at 4, 10, and 16 months. The primary outcome measures were overall physical function (Continuous Scale-Physical Functional Performance [CS-PFP]), balance (Functional Reach Test [FRT]), and walking economy (oxygen uptake [mL/kg/min]). Secondary outcome measures were symptom severity (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] activities of daily living [ADL] and motor subscales) and quality of life (39-item Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Scale [PDQ-39]).Of the 121 participants, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 79.3% completed 4, 10, and 16 months, respectively, of the intervention. At 4 months, improvement in CS-PFP scores was greater in the FBF group than in the control group (mean difference=4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.2 to 7.3) and the AE group (mean difference=3.1, 95% CI=0.0 to 6.2). Balance was not different among groups at any time point. Walking economy improved in the AE group compared with the FBF group at 4 months (mean difference=-1.2, 95% CI=-1.9 to -0.5), 10 months (mean difference=-1.2, 95% CI=-1.9 to -0.5), and 16 months (mean difference=-1.7, 95% CI=-2.5 to -1.0). The only secondary outcome that showed significant differences was UPDRS ADL subscale scores: the FBF group performed better than the control group at 4 months (mean difference=-1.47, 95% CI=-2.79 to -0.15) and 16 months (mean difference=-1.95, 95% CI=-3.84 to -0.08).Absence of a non-exercise control group was a limitation of the study.Findings demonstrated overall functional benefits at 4 months in the FBF group and improved walking economy (up to 16 months) in the AE group.

SUBMITTER: Schenkman M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3488266 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Exercise for people in early- or mid-stage Parkinson disease: a 16-month randomized controlled trial.

Schenkman Margaret M Hall Deborah A DA Barón Anna E AE Schwartz Robert S RS Mettler Pamela P Kohrt Wendy M WM

Physical therapy 20120719 11

<h4>Background</h4>Exercise confers short-term benefits for individuals with Parkinson disease (PD).<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of the study was to compare short- and long-term responses among 2 supervised exercise programs and a home-based control exercise program.<h4>Design</h4>The 16-month randomized controlled exercise intervention investigated 3 exercise approaches: flexibility/balance/function exercise (FBF), supervised aerobic exercise (AE), and home-based exercise (control).<h4>Setting ...[more]

PMID: 22822237

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine whether falls can be prevented with minimally supervised exercise targeting potentially remediable fall risk factors, i.e., poor balance, reduced leg muscle strength, and freezing of gait, in people with Parkinson disease.MethodsTwo hundred thirty-one people with Parkinson disease were randomized into exercise or usual-care control groups. Exercises were practiced for 40 to 60 minutes, 3 times weekly for 6 months. Primary outcomes were fall rates and proportion of fallers during the intervention period. Secondary outcomes were physical (balance, mobility, freezing of gait, habitual physical activity), psychological (fear of falling, affect), and quality-of-life measures.ResultsThere was no significant difference between groups in the rate of falls (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.17, p = 0.18) or proportion of fallers (p = 0.45). Preplanned subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction for disease severity (p < 0.001). In the lower disease severity subgroup, there were fewer falls in the exercise group compared with controls (IRR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.62, p < 0.001), while in the higher disease severity subgroup, there was a trend toward more falls in the exercise group (IRR = 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-3.03, p = 0.13). Postintervention, the exercise group scored significantly (p < 0.05) better than controls on the Short Physical Performance Battery, sit-to-stand, fear of falling, affect, and quality of life, after adjusting for baseline performance.ConclusionsAn exercise program targeting balance, leg strength, and freezing of gait did not reduce falls but improved physical and psychological health. Falls were reduced in people with milder disease but not in those with more severe Parkinson disease.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that for patients with Parkinson disease, a minimally supervised exercise program does not reduce fall risk. This study lacked the precision to exclude a moderate reduction or modest increase in fall risk from exercise.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12608000303347).

Project description:BackgroundOverall functional ability declines over time in people with Parkinson disease (PD). Established benchmarks are needed to allow clinicians and researchers to facilitate meaningful interpretation of data.ObjectiveThe purposes of this study were: (1) to report typical values for standard measures of functional ability commonly used in intervention studies and clinical practice with individuals in the early and middle stages of PD and (2) to describe the profile of functional limitations using the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stages of disease and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores.DesignCross-sectional data were obtained from 5 different studies.MethodsThree hundred thirty-nine patients were evaluated for disease severity (UPDRS motor score); functional capacity (Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance Test [CS-PFP]); balance and gait (Functional Reach Test [FRT], Timed "Up & Go" Test [TUG], 360-degree turn, Six-Minute Walk Test [6MWT], and Two-Minute Walk Test); and basic functional activities (supine-to-stand task, stand-to-supine task, and functional axial rotation [FAR]).ResultsThe mean UPDRS motor score for the sample was 39.2 (SD=12.93). At each stage of PD (from least to most involved), scores on functional measures indicated a significant and progressively reduced functional status. Limitations began early in the disease for the CS-PFP and FAR. Losses in performance were consistent across all stages of disease for the CS-PFP, FRT, 6MWT, and FAR. Several measures demonstrated meaningful losses of function only in later stages of disease. Findings extend current appreciation of functional limitations that begin early in PD and can guide the choice of functional outcome measures at different stages of disease severity.LimitationsData were obtained only from participants in H&Y stages 1 through 3 and only for some of the performance measures typically used.ConclusionsThe findings demonstrate that functional loss occurs at different points in the disease process, depending on the task under consideration. The resulting profile of functional limitations provides benchmarks that clinicians and researchers can use to interpret and monitor status of patients.

Project description:Introduction: Exercise training with well-known health benefits is a key element in the self-management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Although current guidelines for patients with CAD recommend daily exercise training, most of the patients do not follow the guidelines. We tested the hypothesis that an exercise training program guided by a novel technology used at home will improve adherence to exercise training. Methods: One to three weeks after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), acute coronary syndrome patients (n = 50) were randomized into traditional (age 65 ± 8 years) and novel technology-guided (age 60 ± 8 years) exercise rehabilitation groups. The novel technology included a tablet computer with a virtual autonomous physiotherapy agent (VAPA group) for every patient at home; it was used to guide exercise training time, volume, and intensity. Traditional rehabilitation was performed by exercise training prescriptions, phone calls, and diaries (control group). The duration of the rehabilitation program was 6 months for both groups. Exercise capacity and 24-h heart rate variability were measured at baseline and at the end of the program. Adherence to exercise was measured over 6 months as the percentage of realized training. Results: None of the patients dropped out from the VAPA group, while three patients dropped out from the control group. Adherence to exercise was higher in the VAPA group than in the control group for resistance training (141% ± 56% vs. 50% ± 20%, p < 0.0001), and there were no differences between the groups for aerobic training (144% ± 45% vs. 119% ± 65%, p = 0.22). Exercise capacity increased in both the groups (time p < 0.001, time × group interaction p = ns). High-frequency power of R-R intervals (lnHF) increased in the VAPA group but remained unchanged in the control group (natural logarithm of lnHF power from 5.5 ± 0.7 to 5.8 ± 0.9 ms2 and from 5.3 ± 0.8 to 5.2 ± 0.7 ms2, respectively, time × group interaction p = 0.014). Conclusion: Compared with the use of traditional methods, the use of novel technology at home results in better adherence to exercise, particularly in resistance training, in acute coronary syndrome patients. Second, the VAPA group showed improved cardiac vagal regulation, documented by increased vagally mediated R-R interval fluctuation, compared with the traditional training group (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03704025).

Project description:BackgroundExercise training may have the potential to improve post-thrombotic syndrome, a frequent, chronic complication of deep venous thrombosis. We conducted a randomized controlled two-centre pilot trial to assess the feasibility of a multicentre-based evaluation of a six-month exercise training program to treat post-thrombotic syndrome and to obtain preliminary data on the effectiveness of such a program.MethodsPatients were randomized to receive exercise training (a six-month trainer-supervised program) or control treatment (an education session with monthly phone follow-ups). Levels of eligibility, consent, adherence and retention were used as indicators of study feasibility. Primary outcomes were change from baseline to six months in venous disease-specific quality of life (as measured using the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life [VEINES-QOL] questionnaire) and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome (as measured by scores on the Villalta scale) in the exercise training group versus the control group, assessed by t tests. Secondary outcomes were change in generic quality of life (as measured using the Short-Form Health Survey-36 [SF-36] questionnaire), category of severity of post-thrombotic syndrome, leg strength, leg flexibility and time on treadmill.ResultsOf 95 patients with post-thrombotic syndrome, 69 were eligible, 43 consented and were randomized, and 39 completed the study. Exercise training was associated with improvement in VEINES-QOL scores (exercise training mean change 6.0, standard deviation [SD] 5.1 v. control mean change 1.4, SD 7.2; difference 4.6, 95% CI 0.54 to 8.7; p = 0.027) and improvement in scores on the Villalta scale (exercise training mean change -3.6, SD 3.7 v. control mean change -1.6, SD 4.3; difference -2.0, 95% CI -4.6 to 0.6; p = 0.14). Most secondary outcomes also showed greater improvement in the exercise training group.InterpretationExercise training may improve post-thrombotic syndrome. It would be feasible to definitively evaluate exercise training as a treatment for post-thrombotic syndrome in a large multicentre trial.

Dataset Information

Exercise for people in early- or mid-stage Parkinson disease: a 16-month randomized controlled trial.

Publications

Exercise for people in early- or mid-stage Parkinson disease: a 16-month randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets