Dataset Information

Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM index reliably assesses lower limb deformity.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although several systems exist for classifying specific limb deformities, there currently are no validated rating scales for evaluating the complexity of general lower limb deformities. Accurate assessment of the complexity of a limb deformity is essential for successful treatment. A committee of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society (LLRS) therefore developed the LLRS AIM Index to quantify the severity of a broad range of lower extremity deformities in seven domains.

Questions/purposes

We addressed two questions: (1) Does the LLRS AIM Index show construct validity by correlating with rankings of case complexity? (2) Does the LLRS AIM Index show sufficient interrater and intrarater reliabilities?

Methods

We had eight surgeons evaluate 10 fictionalized patients with various lower limb deformities. First, they ranked the cases from simplest to most complex, and then they rated the cases using the LLRS AIM Index. Two or more weeks later, they rated the cases again. We assessed reliability using the Kendall's W test.

Results

Raters were consistent in their rankings of case complexity (W = 0.33). Patient rankings also correlated with both sets of LLRS AIM ratings (r(2) = 0.25; r(2) = 0.23). The LLRS AIM Index showed interrater reliability with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.97 for Trial 1 and 0.98 for Trial 2 and intrarater reliability with an ICC of 0.94. The LLRS AIM Index ratings also were highly consistent between the attending surgeons and surgeons-in-training (ICC = 0.91).

Conclusions

Our preliminarily observations suggest that the LLRS AIM Index reliably classifies the complexity of lower limb deformities in and between observers.

SUBMITTER: McCarthy JJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3549163 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM index reliably assesses lower limb deformity.

McCarthy James J JJ Iobst Christopher A CA Rozbruch S Robert SR Sabharwal Sanjeev S Eismann Emily A EA

Clinical orthopaedics and related research 20121002 2

<h4>Background</h4>Although several systems exist for classifying specific limb deformities, there currently are no validated rating scales for evaluating the complexity of general lower limb deformities. Accurate assessment of the complexity of a limb deformity is essential for successful treatment. A committee of the Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society (LLRS) therefore developed the LLRS AIM Index to quantify the severity of a broad range of lower extremity deformities in seven domains ...[more]

PMID: 23054511

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe windswept lower limb deformity describes valgus deformity in one leg with varus deformity in the other. It is mostly seen in young children with metabolic bone diseases (such as rickets) and may lead to leg length discrepancy (LLD) and Degenerative scoliosis (DS) in older age. To the best of our knowledge, there was no report of the spinal surgery in patient with severe DS associated with windswept deformity. The objective of this study is to report the unique case of a 60-year-old woman with severe degenerative scoliosis (DS) associated with windswept deformity caused by rickets who underwent a posterior correction and fusion surgery in spine.Case presentationThe patient was diagnosed as rickets windswept lower limb deformity for 50 years but never went through routine treatment. Then, she performed lumbar scoliosis for more than 20 years and suffered from severe back pain for 4 years. After overall clinical evaluation and radiographic measures, we performed a posterior surgical correction and fusion from T9-L5. With this surgery, the main thoracolumbar curve Cobb angle corrected from 72.5° to 21.0°, the coronal balance from 0 cm to 2.0 cm while the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) from 1.5 cm to - 1.0 cm. At 2 years postoperative follow-up, her back pain has almost completely relieved with a satisfied fixation and bone fusion showed on CT scans. However, a coronal imbalance was found with C7-CSVLdistance equal to 4.0 cm. This coronal imbalance was highly correlated to the untreated LLD and pelvic obliquity, and should be improved by standing posture or shoe lifts.ConclusionsFor such patient, the pure spinal correction and fusion surgery, in spite of lower limbs deformity, can achieve good relieve of back pain symptom, however may accompany by the complication of coronal imbalance due to the unimproved pelvic obliquity and LLD. However, longer follow-up is necessary to observe the long-term outcome of this patient's postoperative coronal imbalance.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate whether contralateral limb strength represents a dynamic, rather than static, data point after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R).MethodsPatients who underwent isolated ACL-R at a single institution were identified. Patients completed an institutional Lower-Extremity Assessment Protocol (LEAP) testing protocol at 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Extension strength and flexion strength of the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs and limb symmetry index (LSI) were compared between the 6- and 9-month testing outcomes. Subgroup analysis compared patients demonstrating less than or greater than 10% change in contralateral limb flexion and extension strength between 6 and 9 months postoperatively.ResultsA total of 144 subjects were included in this study. On average, contralateral limb flexion and extension strength increased 2-4% between 6 and 9 months postoperatively. However, the contralateral limb increased >10% from 6 to 9 months in extension and flexion strength in 35/144 (24.3%) and 55/144 (38.2%) of patients, respectively. The cohort with >10% change between 6 and 9 months had significantly weaker contralateral extension and flexion strength at 6 months compared to the cohort that demonstrated <10% change (extension: 2.00 vs 2.39; P < .001; flexion: 0.84 vs 1.08; P < .001), but similar ipsilateral limb performance. Therefore, the >10% change cohort had a significantly greater LSI at 6 months compared to the <10% change cohort (67.3% vs 59.4%; P = .006). No demographic or operative factors correlated with which patients demonstrated >10% flexion or extension strength changes of the contralateral limb.ConclusionA large percentage of patients demonstrate significant changes in their contralateral limb flexion and extension strength between 6 and 9 months postoperatively that result from an initial contralateral limb strength deficit. This may limit the utility of the contralateral limb as a control for comparison to the operative extremity during return to sport assessment.

Dataset Information

Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM index reliably assesses lower limb deformity.

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society AIM index reliably assesses lower limb deformity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets