Dataset Information

Breast cancer subtyping from plasma proteins.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Early detection of breast cancer in blood is both appealing clinically and challenging technically due to the disease's illusive nature and heterogeneity. Today, even though major breast cancer subtypes have been characterized, i.e., luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, and basal-like, little is known about the heterogeneity of breast cancer in blood, which could help to discover minimally invasive protein biomarkers with which clinical researchers can detect, classify, and monitor different breast cancer subtypes.

Results

In this study, we performed an integrative pathway-assisted clustering analysis of breast cancer subtypes from plasma proteome samples collected from 80 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and 80 healthy women. First, four breast cancer subtypes and additionally unknown subtype (according to existing annotation) were determined based on pathology lab test results in primary tumors of enrolled patients. Next, we developed and applied four distance metrics, i.e., Protein Intensity, Q-Value, Pathway Profile, and Distance Score Function, to measure and characterize these cancer subtypes. Then, we developed a permutation test to evaluate the significant protein level changes in each biological pathway for each breast cancer subtype, using q-value. Lastly, we developed a pathway-protein matrix for each of the four distance methods to estimate the distance between breast cancer subtypes, for which further Pathway Association Network analysis were performed.

Conclusions

We found that 1) the luminal group (luminal A and luminal B) are clustered together, as well as the basal group (basal-like and HER2+) and 2) luminal A and luminal B are more close to each other than basal-like and HER2+ to each other. Our results were consistent with a recent independent breast cancer research from the Cancer Genome Atlas Network using genomic DNA copy number arrays, DNA methylation, exome sequencing, messenger RNA arrays, microRNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays. Our results showed that changes of different breast cancer subtypes at the pathway level are more profound and less variable than those at the molecular level. Similar subtypes share distinct yet similar pathway activation networks, while dissimilar subtypes are different also at the level of pathway activation networks. The results also showed that distance or similarity of cancer subtypes based on pathway analysis might be able to provide further insight into the intrinsic relationship of breast cancer subtypes. We believe integrative pathway-assisted proteomics analysis described here can become a model for reliable clustering or classification of other cancer subtypes.

SUBMITTER: Zhang F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3552699 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Breast cancer subtyping from plasma proteins.

Zhang Fan F Chen Jake Y JY

BMC medical genomics 20130123

<h4>Background</h4>Early detection of breast cancer in blood is both appealing clinically and challenging technically due to the disease's illusive nature and heterogeneity. Today, even though major breast cancer subtypes have been characterized, i.e., luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, and basal-like, little is known about the heterogeneity of breast cancer in blood, which could help to discover minimally invasive protein biomarkers with which clinical researchers can detect, classify, and monitor di ...[more]

PMID: 23369492

Similar Datasets

Project description:Breast cancer is commonly classified into intrinsic molecular subtypes. Standard gene centering is routinely done prior to molecular subtyping, but it can produce inaccurate classifications when the distribution of clinicopathological characteristics in the study cohort differs from that of the training cohort used to derive the classifier.We propose a subgroup-specific gene-centering method to perform molecular subtyping on a study cohort that has a skewed distribution of clinicopathological characteristics relative to the training cohort. On such a study cohort, we center each gene on a specified percentile, where the percentile is determined from a subgroup of the training cohort with clinicopathological characteristics similar to the study cohort. We demonstrate our method using the PAM50 classifier and its associated University of North Carolina (UNC) training cohort. We considered study cohorts with skewed clinicopathological characteristics, including subgroups composed of a single prototypic subtype of the UNC-PAM50 training cohort (n = 139), an external estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cohort (n = 48) and an external triple-negative cohort (n = 77).Subgroup-specific gene centering improved prediction performance with the accuracies between 77% and 100%, compared to accuracies between 17% and 33% from standard gene centering, when applied to the prototypic tumor subsets of the PAM50 training cohort. It reduced classification error rates on the ER-positive (11% versus 28%; P = 0.0389), the ER-negative (5% versus 41%; P < 0.0001) and the triple-negative (11% versus 56%; P = 0.1336) subgroups of the PAM50 training cohort. In addition, it produced higher accuracy for subtyping study cohorts composed of varying proportions of ER-positive versus ER-negative cases. Finally, it increased the percentage of assigned luminal subtypes on the external ER-positive cohort and basal-like subtype on the external triple-negative cohort.Gene centering is often necessary to accurately apply a molecular subtype classifier. Compared with standard gene centering, our proposed subgroup-specific gene centering produced more accurate molecular subtype assignments in a study cohort with skewed clinicopathological characteristics relative to the training cohort.

Project description:BackgroundAfter multiple lines of therapies, no guideline or consensus is currently available for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a novel re-subtyping and treatment strategy based on ctDNA alterations.MethodsThis observational, multicentre study recruited 223 patients with metastatic breast cancer intending to receive late-line therapy from Dec 1, 2016, to June 31, 2019. This study took place in Hunan Cancer Hospital, the Forth Hospital of Changsha and Zhuzhou Central Hospital in China. ctDNA alterations were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients with druggable ctDNA alterations were treated with corresponding targeted drugs which are clinically available. Other patients received physician-chosen treatment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05079074.FindingsThe progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.45, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.33-0.62, P < 0.0001) and disease control rate (89.4% vs. 65.9%, P < 0.0001) were significantly improved in patients who received druggable ctDNA alteration-guided therapy compared with those of patients who received physician-chosen treatment. ctDNA alterations with top rank and high clustering scores were classified into four subtypes based on their functions as follows: 1) extracellular function (ECF), 2) cell proliferation (CP), 3) nuclear function (NF), and 4) cascade signaling pathway (CSP). A significant benefit from ctDNA alteration-guided treatment was observed in patients with NF and CSP ctDNA alterations, with hazard ratios of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.24-0.65, P = 0.0003) and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.04-0.46, P < 0.0001), respectively.InterpretationAfter multiline traditional pathological HR/HER2 subtype-guided therapies, ctDNA testing could identify druggable ctDNA alterations to guide late-line therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.FundingThis work was supported by Key Grants of Research and Development in Hunan Province (2018SK2124, 2018SK2120), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2019JJ50360), Hunan Provincial Health Commission Project (B2019085, B2019089 and C2019070), and Changsha Science and Technology Project (kq2004125 and kq2004137).

Dataset Information

Breast cancer subtyping from plasma proteins.

Background

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Breast cancer subtyping from plasma proteins.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets