Dataset Information

Probing GPCR structure: adenosine and P2Y nucleotide receptors.

ABSTRACT: The adenosine receptors (ARs) provide an example of how to accurately predict ligand recognition, even prior to the availability of a crystallographic structure. Homology modeling has been used to gain structural insight, in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis, and structure-activity relationships of small molecular ligands. Recent X-ray structures greatly improved the accuracy of knowledge of AR ligand recognition and furthermore characterized conformational changes induced by receptor activation. Now, homology modeling extends these structural insights to related GPCRs and suggests new ligand structures. This strategy is also being applied to the eight subtypes of P2Y receptors for extracellular nucleotides, which lack X-ray structures and are best modeled by homology to the CXCR4 (peptide) receptor. Neoceptors, as studied for three of the four AR subtypes, create a molecular complementarity between a mutant receptor and a chemically tailored agonist ligand to selectively enhance affinity, implying direct physical contact and thus validating docking hypotheses.

SUBMITTER: Jacobson KA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3579568 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Probing GPCR structure: adenosine and P2Y nucleotide receptors.

Jacobson Kenneth A KA Costanzi Stefano S Deflorian Francesca F

Methods in enzymology 20130101

The adenosine receptors (ARs) provide an example of how to accurately predict ligand recognition, even prior to the availability of a crystallographic structure. Homology modeling has been used to gain structural insight, in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis, and structure-activity relationships of small molecular ligands. Recent X-ray structures greatly improved the accuracy of knowledge of AR ligand recognition and furthermore characterized conformational changes induced by receptor a ...[more]

PMID: 23332701

Similar Datasets

Project description:Introduction: The most common side effect of ticagrelor is dyspnea, which leads to premature withdrawal of this life-saving medication in 6.5% of patients. Increased chemoreceptors' sensitivity was suggested as a possible pathophysiological explanation of this phenomenon; however, the link between oversensitization of peripheral and/or central chemosensory areas and ticagrelor intake has not been conclusively proved. Methods: We measured peripheral chemoreceptors' sensitivity using hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), central chemoreceptors' sensitivity using hypercapnic hyperoxic ventilatory response (HCVR), and dyspnea severity before and 4 ± 1 weeks following ticagrelor initiation in 11 subjects with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The same tests were performed in 11 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched patients treated with clopidogrel. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.com at NCT05080478. Results: Ticagrelor significantly increased both HVR (0.52 ± 0.46 vs. 0.84 ± 0.69 L min-1 %-1; p < 0.01) and HCVR (1.05 ± 0.64 vs. 1.75 ± 1.04 L min-1 mmHg-1; p < 0.01). The absolute change in HVR correlated with the change in HCVR. Clopidogrel administration did not significantly influence HVR (0.63 ± 0.32 vs. 0.58 ± 0.33 L min-1%-1; p = 0.53) and HCVR (1.22 ± 0.67 vs. 1.2 ± 0.64 L min-1 mmHg-1; p = 0.79). Drug-related dyspnea was reported by three subjects in the ticagrelor group and by none in the clopidogrel group. These patients were characterized by either high baseline HVR and HCVR or excessive increase in HVR following ticagrelor initiation. Discussion: Ticagrelor, contrary to clopidogrel, sensitizes both peripheral and central facets of chemodetection. Two potential mechanisms of ticagrelor-induced dyspnea have been identified: 1) high baseline HVR and HCVR or 2) excessive increase in HVR or HVR and HCVR. Whether other patterns of changes in chemosensitivities play a role in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon needs to be further investigated.

Project description:Human P2Y receptors encompass at least eight subtypes of Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), responding to adenine and/or uracil nucleotides. Using a BLAST search against the Homo sapiens subset of the SWISS-PROT and TrEMBL databases, we identified 68 proteins showing high similarity to P2Y receptors. To address the problem of low sequence identity between rhodopsin and the P2Y receptors, we performed a multiple-sequence alignment of the retrieved proteins and the template bovine rhodopsin, combining manual identification of the transmembrane domains (TMs) with automatic techniques. The resulting phylogenetic tree delineated two distinct subgroups of P2Y receptors: Gq-coupled subtypes (e.g., P2Y1) and those coupled to Gi (e.g., P2Y12). On the basis of sequence comparison we mutated three Tyr residues of the putative P2Y1 binding pocket to Ala and Phe and characterized pharmacologically the mutant receptors expressed in COS-7 cells. The mutation of Y306 (7.35, site of a cationic residue in P2Y12) or Y203 in the second extracellular loop selectively decreased the affinity of the agonist 2-MeSADP, and the Y306F mutation also reduced antagonist (MRS2179) affinity by 5-fold. The Y273A (6.48) mutation precluded the receptor activation without a major effect on the ligand-binding affinities, but the Y273F mutant receptor still activated G proteins with full agonist affinity. Thus, we have identified new recognition elements to further define the P2Y1 binding site and related these to other P2Y receptor subtypes. Following sequence-based secondary-structure prediction, we constructed complete models of all the human P2Y receptors by homology to rhodopsin. Ligand docking on P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptor models was guided by mutagenesis results, to identify the residues implicated in the binding process. Different sets of cationic residues in the two subgroups appeared to coordinate phosphate-bearing ligands. Within the P2Y1 subgroup these residues are R3.29, K/R6.55, and R7.39. Within the P2Y12 subgroup, the only residue in common with P2Y1 is R6.55, and the role of R3.29 in TM3 seems to be fulfilled by a Lys residue in EL2, whereas the R7.39 in TM7 seems to be substituted by K7.35. Thus, we have identified common and distinguishing features of P2Y receptor structure and have proposed modes of ligand binding for the two representative subtypes that already have well-developed ligands.

Dataset Information

Probing GPCR structure: adenosine and P2Y nucleotide receptors.

Publications

Probing GPCR structure: adenosine and P2Y nucleotide receptors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets