Dataset Information

Quantitative properties and receptor reserve of the DAG and PKC branch of G(q)-coupled receptor signaling.

ABSTRACT: Gq protein-coupled receptors (GqPCRs) of the plasma membrane activate the phospholipase C (PLC) signaling cascade. PLC cleaves the membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into the second messengers diacylgycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), leading to calcium release, protein kinase C (PKC) activation, and in some cases, PIP2 depletion. We determine the kinetics of each of these downstream endpoints and also ask which is responsible for the inhibition of KCNQ2/3 (KV7.2/7.3) potassium channels in single living tsA-201 cells. We measure DAG production and PKC activity by Förster resonance energy transfer-based sensors, and PIP2 by KCNQ2/3 channels. Fully activating endogenous purinergic receptors by uridine 5'triphosphate (UTP) leads to calcium release, DAG production, and PKC activation, but no net PIP2 depletion. Fully activating high-density transfected muscarinic receptors (M1Rs) by oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M) leads to similar calcium, DAG, and PKC signals, but PIP2 is depleted. KCNQ2/3 channels are inhibited by the Oxo-M treatment (85%) and not by UTP (<1%), indicating that depletion of PIP2 is required to inhibit KCNQ2/3 in response to receptor activation. Overexpression of A kinase-anchoring protein (AKAP)79 or calmodulin (CaM) does not increase KCNQ2/3 inhibition by UTP. From these results and measurements of IP3 and calcium presented in our companion paper (Dickson et al. 2013. J. Gen. Physiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201210886), we extend our kinetic model for signaling from M1Rs to DAG/PKC and IP3/calcium signaling. We conclude that calcium/CaM and PKC-mediated phosphorylation do not underlie dynamic KCNQ2/3 channel inhibition during GqPCR activation in tsA-201 cells. Finally, our experimental data provide indirect evidence for cleavage of PI(4)P by PLC in living cells, and our modeling revisits/explains the concept of receptor reserve with measurements from all steps of GqPCR signaling.

SUBMITTER: Falkenburger BH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3639584 | biostudies-literature | 2013 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantitative properties and receptor reserve of the DAG and PKC branch of G(q)-coupled receptor signaling.

Falkenburger Björn H BH Dickson Eamonn J EJ Hille Bertil B

The Journal of general physiology 20130501 5

Gq protein-coupled receptors (GqPCRs) of the plasma membrane activate the phospholipase C (PLC) signaling cascade. PLC cleaves the membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into the second messengers diacylgycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), leading to calcium release, protein kinase C (PKC) activation, and in some cases, PIP2 depletion. We determine the kinetics of each of these downstream endpoints and also ask which is responsible for the inhibition of KCNQ ...[more]

PMID: 23630338

Similar Datasets

Project description:Under oxidative and electrophilic stresses, cells launch an NRF2-mediated transcriptional antioxidant program. The activation of NRF2 depends on a redox sensor, KEAP1, which promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of NRF2. While a great deal has been learned about this duo, its quantitative signaling properties are largely unexplored. Here we examined these properties, including half-life, maximal activation, and response steepness (ultrasensitivity) of NRF2, through mathematical modeling. The models describe the binding of KEAP1 and NRF2 via ETGE and DLG motifs, NRF2 production, KEAP1-dependent and independent NRF2 degradation, and perturbations by different classes of NRF2 activators. Simulations revealed at the basal condition, NRF2 is sequestered by KEAP1 and the KEAP1-NRF2 complex is distributed comparably in an ETGE-bound (open) state and an ETGE and DLG dual-bound (closed) state. When two-step ETGE binding is considered, class I-V, electrophilic NRF2 activators shift the balance to a closed state incompetent to degrade NRF2, while the open and closed KEAP1-NRF2 complexes transition from operating in cycle mode to equilibrium mode. Ultrasensitive NRF2 activation (a steep rise of free NRF2) can occur when NRF2 nearly saturates KEAP1. The ultrasensitivity results from zero-order degradation through DLG binding and protein sequestration through ETGE binding. Optimal abundances of cytosolic and nuclear KEAP1 exist to maximize ultrasensitivity. These response characteristics do not require disruption of DLG binding as suggested by the hinge-latch hypothesis. In comparison, class VI NRF2 activators cause a shift to the open KEAP1-NRF2 complex and ultimately its complete dissociation, resulting in a fast release of NRF2 followed by stabilization. However, ultrasensitivity is lost due to decreasing free KEAP1 abundance. In summary, by simulating the dual role of KEAP1, i.e., sequestering and promoting degradation of NRF2, our modeling provides novel quantitative insights into NRF2 activation, which may help design novel NRF2 modulators and understand the oxidative actions of environmental stressors.

Dataset Information

Quantitative properties and receptor reserve of the DAG and PKC branch of G(q)-coupled receptor signaling.

Publications

Quantitative properties and receptor reserve of the DAG and PKC branch of G(q)-coupled receptor signaling.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets