Single stage total endolesional C2 spondylectomy for chordoma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Suchomel P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3676555 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Single stage total endolesional C2 spondylectomy for chordoma.
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 20130601 6
Similar Datasets
Project description:To compare total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for single spinal metastasis, we undertook a single center retrospective study. We identified patients who had undergone TES or SABR for a single spinal metastasis between 2000 and 2019. Medical records and images were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics, and oncologic outcomes. Patients who received TES were matched to those who received SABR to compare local control and survival. A total of 89 patients were identified, of whom 20 and 69 received TES and SABR, respectively. A total of 38 matched patients were analyzed (19 TES and 19 SABR). The median follow-up period was 54.4 (TES) and 26.1 months (SABR) for matched patients. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 66.7% and 72.2% in the TES and 38.9% and 50.7% in the SABR group, respectively. At the final follow-up of the matched cohorts, no significant differences were noted in OS (p = 0.554), PFS (p = 0.345) or local progression (p = 0.133). The rate of major complications was higher in the TES than in the SABR group (21.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.660). These findings suggest that SABR leads to fewer complications compared to TES, while TES exhibits better mid-term control of metastatic tumors.
| S-EPMC10705804 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9808100 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of anterior column reconstruction using single or double titanium mesh cage (TMC) after total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed involving 39 patients with thoracic or lumbar spinal tumors. All patients underwent TES, followed by anterior reconstruction and screw-rod instrumentation via a posterior-only procedure. Twenty-two patients in group A were treated with a single TMC to reconstruct the anterior column, whereas 17 patients in group B were reconstructed with double TMCs.ResultsThe overall follow-up is 20.5 ± 4.6 months. There is no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, tumor location, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. The time for TMC placement was significantly shortened in the double TMCs group (5.2 ± 1.3 minutes vs. 15.6 ± 3.3 minutes, p = 0.004). Additionally, postoperative neural complications were significantly reduced with double TMCs (5/22 vs. 0/17, p = 0.046). The kyphotic Cobb angle and mean intervertebral height were significantly corrected in both groups (p ≤ 0.001), without obvious loss of correction at the last follow-up in either group. The bone fusion rates for single TMC and double TMCs were 77.3% and 76.5%, respectively.ConclusionUsing 2 smaller TMCs instead of a single large one eases the placement of TMC by shortening the time and avoiding nerve impingement. Anterior column reconstruction with double TMC is a clinically feasible, and safe alternative following TES for thoracic and lumbar tumors.
| S-EPMC11224740 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chordomas are rare low malignant neoplasm arising from remnants of the notochord with predilection site of the clivus or the os sacrum. Standard therapy is radical excision and adjuvant radiation. Due to invasive growth and adjacent to vital structures resection is often incomplete, and therefore, local recurrence is frequent. First, to the best knowledge of our authors, we present a 70-year-old man with a recurrent chordoma infiltrating the corpus cavernosum. Asymptomatic recurrence was diagnosed by magnet resonance imaging according to the standard follow-up. Our interdisciplinary tumor board recommended surgical resection. We performed a total penectomy and perineal urethrostomy to achieve negative resection margins and preserve best quality of life for the patient.
| S-EPMC7040421 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo obtain a better understanding of the structures around L5 vertebra and provide some anatomical evidence of the feasibility of total en-bloc spondylectomy (TES) on L5 in a posterior-only approach.Methods12 simulated TESs on L5 by a posterior-only approach were conducted on human cadavers. The distance between the traction point of L4 nerve root and the dural sac (Da), the anterior-posterior diameter of the vertebral body,(Va), the distance between the start point of L4 nerve root and the traction point of L5 nerve root (Dh) and the height of the vertebral body (Vh) were measured. Paired t-test and liner regression were performed to determine the difference and correlation between Da and Va, and between Dh and Vh. The risk of nerve roots or blood vessels damages, and the obstruction caused by iliac wings were evaluated.ResultsLiner correlations were found between Da and Va, and between Dh and Vh. The regression equations were Da = 0.6673Va + 11.28 and Dh = 1.009Vh + 1.003. There are statistical significant differences between Dh and Vh, and between Da and Va in those whose Va < 34.96 mm. Nerve roots or blood vessels damages and the obstruction caused by iliac wing were able to be avoided.ConclusionsIf the patient has an anterior-posterior diameter of L5 vertebral body shorter than 34.96 mm, it is possible that the vertebral body can be taken out during TES in a posterior-only approach. Prevention of nerve roots or blood vessels damages, and the obstruction caused by iliac wings are difficulties of this procedure yet not insurmountable. TES on L5 by a posterior-only approach might a possible alternative in treating diseases like L5 vertebral body tumors.
| S-EPMC6260441 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7571630 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTotal en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is an important surgical treatment for spinal tumors that can achieve en bloc resection of the affected vertebral body by using the T-saw. However, the conventional TES process and the surgical instruments currently in use have some inconveniences, which may lead to longer operative times and a higher incidence of complications. To address these obstacles, we developed a modified TES technique using a homemade intervertebral hook blade. The objectives of this study were to describe our modified total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) using a homemade intervertebral hook blade and to assess its clinical effects in patients with spinal tumors.MethodsTwenty-three consecutive patients with spinal tumors were included from September 2018 to November 2021. Eleven patients underwent a modified TES using an intervertebral hook blade, and 12 patients underwent a conventional TES using a wire saw. Details of the modified technique for TES were depicted, and the intraoperative blood loss, operative time, and improvement in pain symptom and neurological function measured by visual analog score (VAS) and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score of all patients was reviewed and analyzed. Nonparametric analysis of covariates (ANCOVA) was performed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients treated with modified TES and conventional TES.ResultsThe modified TES significantly reduced operative time (F = 7.935, p = 0.010) and achieved favorable improvement of neurological function (F = 0.570, p = 0.459) and relief of pain (F = 3.196, p = 0.088) compared with the conventional TES group. The mean intraoperative blood loss in the modified TES group (2381.82 ml) was lower than that in the conventional TES group (3558.33 ml), although the difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.677, p = 0.420).ConclusionsModified TES using the intervertebral hook blade can effectively reduce the operation time and intraoperative bleeding, and meanwhile ensure the improvement of neurological function and relief of pain symptoms, suggesting that this modified technique is feasible, safe, and effective for spinal tumors.
| S-EPMC10235171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveMulti-segmental total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) gradually became more commonly used by clinicians. However, the choice of surgical strategy is unclear. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical performance of different prosthesis types and fixation ranges in multisegmental TES.MethodsIn this study, a validated finite element model of T12-L2 post-spondylectomy operations were carried out. The prostheses of these models used either 3D-printed artificial vertebrae or titanium mesh cages. The fixed range was two or three segment levels. Range of motion, stress distribution of the endplate and internal fixation system, intervertebral disc pressure, and facet joint surface force of four postoperative models and intact model in flexion and extension, as well as lateral bending and rotation were analyzed and compared.ResultsThe type of prosthesis used in the anterior column reconstruction mainly affected the stress of the adjacent endplate and the prosthesis itself. The posterior fixation range had a greater influence on the overall range of motion (ROM), the ROM of the adjacent segment, the stress of the screw-rod system, and adjacent facet joint surface force. For the model of the same prosthesis, the increase of fixed length resulted in an obvious reduction of ROM. The maximal decrease was 70.23% during extension, and the minimal decrease was 30.19% during rotation.ConclusionIn three-segment TES, the surgical strategy of using 3D-printed artificial prosthesis for anterior column support and pedicle screws for posterior fixation at both two upper and lower levels respectively can reduce the stress on internal fixation system, endplates, and adjacent intervertebral discs, resulting in a reduced risk of internal fixation failure, and ASD development.
| S-EPMC11456706 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty is a significant complication that is a common reason for revision surgery. The current standard of care is two-stage revision surgery. There is however increasing evidence to support the use of single-stage revision surgery. We conducted a PRISMA systematic review of the current evidence on the use of single-stage revision for infected total knee arthroplasty. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library) were systematically screened for eligible studies. The risk bias of each study was identified using ROBINS-I tool, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Sixteen articles were retained after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria that evaluated 3645 knee single-stage revision surgeries. Our review reveals satisfactory outcomes for single-stage revision in the management of infected total knee arthroplasty. The reinfection rates in the studies included in our review varied however the majority reported low reinfection rates and good functional outcomes. Although strict patient selection criteria have yielded successful results, good results were also reported when these criteria were not applied. The greater use of risk factors in identifying patients likely to have a successful outcome needs to be balanced with the practical benefits of performing a single stage procedure in higher risk patients. Future large clinical randomized control trials are required to confirm our results.
| S-EPMC6406500 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTotal en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is a widely accepted surgical technique for primary spinal bone tumours but is frequently accompanied by substantial peri-operative blood loss. Prior studies have reported estimated blood loss (EBL) can reach up to 3,200 mL. The aim of this study is to estimate the blood loss during TES procedures performed in the last ten years at our tertiary referral centre and compare EBL with actual blood loss (ABL).MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all cases managed surgically with TES referred to our centre between 2005 and 2015. We recorded the oncological characteristics of each tumour and surgical management in terms of resection margins, operative duration and instrumentation. Data relating to peri-operative blood loss was also recorded including an estimation of total blood loss, the use of cell salvage where applicable and transfusion rates.ResultsA total of 21 patients were found to meet our inclusion criteria. There were 11 men and 10 women, with a median age of 40 years. The mean total ABL was 3,310 mL. Total operation time ranged from 6.53 to 19.7 h. Compared to ABL, in 59% of cases EBL had been underestimated by an average of 78% by volume. The EBL of the remaining 41% cases had been overestimated by 43%. This was not statistically significant (P=0.373). Cell salvage was used in 62% patients with a mean blood loss of 2,845 mL (884-4,939 mL) and transfusion of 3.8 units (0-12 units) versus 4,069 mL (297-8,335 mL) and 9.3 units (0-18 units) in those not managed with cell salvage. There was no significant difference in ABL between the cell salvage and non-cell salvage groups.ConclusionsWe report one of the largest case series in TES for primary bone tumours. EBL is not a reliable predictor for ABL. A large blood loss should be anticipated and use of cell salvage is recommended.
| S-EPMC9547703 | biostudies-literature