Dataset Information

Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To compare corneal thickness profiles of cross-sections of cornea determined by arc-scanned immersion ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods

Corneas of 28 eyes from 14 participants were scanned in triplicate using the Artemis 2 high-frequency arc-scanned ultrasound system (ArcScan Inc) and the Visante OCT system (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Corneal thickness and reproducibility were compared within 3.5 mm of central cornea in the horizontal plane.

Results

Although highly correlated, Visante central and peripheral corneal thickness values were systematically thinner than Artemis 2 values. Within the central 0.5 mm, the difference was approximately 8 μm, but the difference increased with distance from the center. Reproducibility for each instrument was comparable, measuring <4 μm centrally and increasing peripherally.

Conclusions

Visante OCT measurements of corneal thickness are thinner than Artemis 2 ultrasound values centrally with an increasing difference with peripheral position. Measurement reproducibility was comparable for the two techniques.

SUBMITTER: Ursea R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3684006 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles.

Ursea Roxana R Feng Matthew M Urs Raksha R RoyChoudhury Arindam A Silverman Ronald H RH

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) 20121130 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare corneal thickness profiles of cross-sections of cornea determined by arc-scanned immersion ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (OCT).<h4>Methods</h4>Corneas of 28 eyes from 14 participants were scanned in triplicate using the Artemis 2 high-frequency arc-scanned ultrasound system (ArcScan Inc) and the Visante OCT system (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Corneal thickness and reproducibility were compared within 3.5 mm of central cornea in the horizontal plane.<h4>Results</ ...[more]

PMID: 23205905

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo map the corneal epithelial thickness with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and to develop epithelial thickness-based variables for keratoconus detection.DesignCross-sectional observational study.ParticipantsOne hundred forty-five eyes from 76 normal subjects and 35 keratoconic eyes from 22 patients.MethodsA 26,000-Hz Fourier-domain OCT system with 5-μm axial resolution was used. The cornea was imaged with a Pachymetry + Cpwr scan pattern (6-mm scan diameter, 8 radials, 1024 axial-scans each, repeated 5 times) centered on the pupil. Three scans were obtained at a single visit in a prospective study. A computer algorithm was developed to map the corneal epithelial thickness automatically. Zonal epithelial thicknesses and 5 diagnostic variables, including minimum, superior-inferior (S-I), minimum-maximum (MIN-MAX), map standard deviation (MSD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD), were calculated. Repeatability of the measurements was assessed by the pooled standard deviation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.Main outcome measuresDescriptive statistics, repeatability, and AUC of the zonal epithelial thickness and diagnostic variables.ResultsThe central, superior, and inferior epithelial thickness averages were 52.3 ± 3.6 μm, 49.6 ± 3.5 μm, and 51.2 ± 3.4 μm in normal eyes and 51.9 ± 5.3 μm, 51.2 ± 4.2 μm, and 49.1 ± 4.3 μm in keratoconic eyes. Compared with normal eyes, keratoconic eyes had significantly lower inferior (P = 0.03) and minimum (P<0.0001) corneal epithelial thickness, greater S-I (P = 0.013), more negative MIN-MAX (P<0.0001), greater MSD (P<0.0001), and larger PSD (P<0.0001). The repeatability of the zonal average, minimum, S-I, and MIN-MAX epithelial thickness variables were between 0.7 and 1.9 μm. The repeatability of MSD was better than 0.4 μm. The repeatability of PSD was 0.02 or better. Among all epithelial thickness-based variables investigated, PSD provided the best diagnostic power (AUC = 1.00). Using an PSD cutoff value of 0.057 alone gave 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity.ConclusionsHigh-resolution Fourier-domain OCT mapped corneal epithelial thickness with good repeatability in both normal and keratoconic eyes. Keratoconus was characterized by apical epithelial thinning. The resulting deviation from the normal epithelial pattern could be detected with very high accuracy using the PSD variable.Financial disclosure(s)Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Dataset Information

Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles.

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets