Dataset Information

External suction versus water seal after selective pulmonary resection for lung neoplasm: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate whether external suction is more advantageous than water seal in patients undergoing selective pulmonary resection (SPR) for lung neoplasm.

Summary of background data

Whether external suction should be routinely applied in postoperative chest drainage is still unclear, particularly for lung neoplasm patients. To most surgeons, the decision is based on their clinical experience.

Methods

Randomized control trials were selected. The participants were patients undergoing SPR with lung neoplasm. Lung volume reduction surgery and pneumothorax were excluded. Suction versus non-suction for the intervention. The primary outcome was the incidence of persistent air leak (PAL). The definition of PAL was air leak for more than 3-7 days. The secondary outcomes included air leak duration, time of drainage, postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative pneumothorax. Studies were identified from literature collections through screening. Bias was analyzed and meta-analysis was used.

Results

From the 1824 potentially relevant trials, 6 randomized control trials involving 676 patients were included. There was no difference between external suction and water seal in decreasing the incidence of PAL [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-2.16; z?=?1.10; P?=?0.27]. Regarding secondary outcomes, there were no differences in time of drainage (95% CI-0.36-1.56, P?=?0.22), postoperative hospital stay (95% CI -.31-.54, P?=?0.87) or incidence of postoperative pneumothorax (95% CI 0.18-.02, P?=?0.05) between external suction and water seal.

Conclusions

For participants, no differences are identified in terms of PAL incidence, drainage time, length of postoperative hospital stay or incidence of postoperative pneumothorax between external suction and water seal. The bias analysis should be emphasized. To the limitations of the bias and methodological differences among the included studies, we have no recommendation on whether external suction should be routinely applied after lung neoplasm SPR. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.

Systematic review registration

None.

SUBMITTER: Qiu T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3706622 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

External suction versus water seal after selective pulmonary resection for lung neoplasm: a systematic review.

Qiu Tong T Shen Yi Y Wang Ming-zhao MZ Wang Yao-peng YP Wang Dong D Wang Zi-zong ZZ Jin Xiang-feng XF Wei Yu-cheng YC

PloS one 20130709 7

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate whether external suction is more advantageous than water seal in patients undergoing selective pulmonary resection (SPR) for lung neoplasm.<h4>Summary of background data</h4>Whether external suction should be routinely applied in postoperative chest drainage is still unclear, particularly for lung neoplasm patients. To most surgeons, the decision is based on their clinical experience.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomized control trials were selected. The participants were pati ...[more]

PMID: 23874505

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNon-small cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer. Surgery is proven to be the most effective treatment in early stages, despite its potential impact on quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation, either before or after surgery, is associated with reduced morbidity related symptoms and improved exercise capacity, lung function and quality of life.MethodsWe describe the study protocol for the open-label randomized controlled trial we are conducting on patients affected by primary lung cancer (stages I-II) eligible for surgical treatment. The control group receives standard care consisting in one educational session before surgery and early inpatient postoperative physiotherapy. The treatment group receives, in addition to standard care, intensive rehabilitation involving 14 preoperative sessions (6 outpatient and 8 home-based) and 39 postoperative sessions (15 outpatient and 24 home-based) with aerobic, resistance and respiratory training, as well as scar massage and group bodyweight exercise training. Assessments are performed at baseline, the day before surgery and one month and six months after surgery. The main outcome is the long-term exercise capacity measured with the Six-Minute Walk Test; short-term exercise capacity, lung function, postoperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, quality of life (Short Form 12), mood disturbances (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) are also recorded and analysed. Patient compliance and treatment-related side effects are also collected. Statistical analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treat approach. T-test for independent samples will be used for continuous variables after assessment of normality of distribution. Chi-square test will be used for categorical variables. Expecting a 10% dropout rate, assuming α of 5% and power of 80%, we planned to enrol 140 patients to demonstrate a statistically significant difference of 25 m at Six-Minute Walk Test.DiscussionPulmonary Resection and Intensive Rehabilitation study (PuReAIR) will contribute significantly in investigating the effects of perioperative rehabilitation on exercise capacity, symptoms, lung function and long-term outcomes in surgically treated lung cancer patients. This study protocol will facilitate interpretation of future results and wide application of evidence-based practice.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Registry n. NCT02405273 [31.03.2015].

Project description:ObjectiveNonintubated anesthesia, electromagnetic navigation (EMN)-guided preoperative localization, and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are recent innovations in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of applying nonintubated anesthesia in a "one-stage" localization and resection workflow.MethodsPatients who underwent EMN-guided preoperative percutaneous localization with indocyanine green (ICG) and uniportal VATS were included. Perioperative data were compared between patients receiving nonintubated anesthesia and those receiving general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.ResultsForty-six patients with a total of 50 nodules were included in the study. Overall, finger palpation could be avoided in 94% of the nodules, whereas fluorescent green signals with a clear border on the pleural surface were noted in 91.3% (21 of 23) of nodules in the nonintubated group and 88.9% (24 of 27) of nodules in the intubated group. Intraoperatively, the nonintubated group had a lower median pH (7.33 [interquartile range (IQR), 7.28-7.40] vs 7.41 [IQR, 7.38-7.44]; P = .003), higher median arterial CO2 (45.5 [IQR, 41.1-58.7] mm Hg vs 38.4 [IQR, 35.3-40.6] mm Hg; P < .001), and lower arterial oxygen (322 [IQR, 211-433] mm Hg vs 426 [IQR, 355-471] mm Hg; P = .005) levels compared with the intubated group. The nonintubated group also had a shorter median registration time (2.0 [IQR, 1.0-3.0] minutes vs 3.0 [IQR, 2.0-8.0] minutes; P = .008) and total time in the operating room (150 [IQR, 130-175] minutes vs 170 [IQR, 135-203] minutes; P = .035), whereas no between-group differences were seen in localization and operative time. The duration of chest drainage, postoperative complications, pathologic diagnosis, and margins were similar in the 2 groups.ConclusionsNonintubated "one-stage" EMN-guided percutaneous ICG localization and uniportal VATS can be an option for selected patients undergoing treatment for small peripheral nodules.

Project description:BackgroundAccurate prediction of postoperative pulmonary function is important for ensuring the safety of patients undergoing radical resection for lung cancer. Dynamic perfusion digital radiography is an excellent and easy imaging method for detecting blood flow in the lung compared with the less-convenient conventional lung perfusion scintigraphy. As such, the present study aimed to confirm whether dynamic perfusion digital radiography can be evaluated in comparison with pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy in predicting early postoperative pulmonary function and complications.MethodsDynamic perfusion digital radiography and spirometry were performed before and 1 and 3 months after radical resection for lung cancer. Correlation coefficients between blood flow ratios calculated using dynamic perfusion digital radiography and pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy were then confirmed in the same cases. In all patients who underwent dynamic perfusion digital radiography, the correlation predicted values calculated from the blood flow ratio, and measured values were examined. Furthermore, ppo%FEV1 or ppo%DLco values, which indicated the risk for perioperative complications, were examined.ResultsA total of 52 participants who satisfied the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Blood flow ratios measured using pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and dynamic perfusion digital radiography showed excellent correlation and acceptable predictive accuracy. Correlation coefficients between predicted FEV1 values obtained from dynamic perfusion digital radiography or pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and actual measured values were similar. All patients who underwent dynamic perfusion digital radiography showed excellent correlation between predicted values and those measured using spirometry. A significant difference in ppo%DLco was observed for respiratory complications but not cardiovascular complications.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that dynamic perfusion digital radiography can be a suitable alternative to pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy given its ability for predicting postoperative values and the risk for postoperative respiratory complications. Furthermore, it seemed to be an excellent modality because of its advantages, such as simplicity, low cost, and ease in obtaining in-depth respiratory functional information.Trial registrationRegistered at UMIN on October 25, 2017. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000033957 Registration number: UMIN000029716.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious biomechanical studies have identified capsular closure, labral repair or reconstruction, and osteochondroplasty as important surgical interventions to improve hip stability.PurposeTo investigate the outcome metrics used to quantify hip stability and assess and measure the relative contributions of the labrum, capsule, and bone to hip stability through a quantitative analysis.Study designSystematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.MethodsPubMed and Embase databases were searched using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included studies evaluated cadaveric hip biomechanics related to capsular, labral, and bony management during hip arthroscopy. Studies were assessed for distraction force and distance, fluid measures, and contact forces used to quantify the suction seal. Exclusion criteria included open surgery, arthroplasty, reorientation osteotomy, or traumatic dislocation.ResultsA total of 33 biomechanical studies comprising 322 hips that evaluated 1 or more of the following were included: distraction force or distance (24 studies), fluid measures (10 studies), and contact forces (6 studies). Compared with a capsulotomy or capsulectomy, capsular repair or reconstruction demonstrated greater resistance to distraction (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.46-1.80; P = .0009). Compared with a labral tear, a labral repair or reconstruction demonstrated less resistance to distraction (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.09; P = .02). Compared with a labral debridement, repair or reconstruction demonstrated greater resistance to distraction (SMD, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.26; P < .00001). No quantitative analysis was feasible from studies evaluating the effect of osseous resection due to the heterogeneity in methodology and outcome metrics assessed.ConclusionMost biomechanical evidence supports capsulotomy repair or reconstruction to improve hip distractive stability at the end of hip arthroscopic surgery. While the repair of a torn labrum does not improve distractive resistance, it is superior to labral debridement in most biomechanical studies.

Dataset Information

External suction versus water seal after selective pulmonary resection for lung neoplasm: a systematic review.

Objective

Summary of background data

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Systematic review registration

Publications

External suction versus water seal after selective pulmonary resection for lung neoplasm: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets