Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Patient-reporting improves estimates of postoperative complication rates: a prospective cohort study in gynaecological oncology.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Most studies use hospital data to calculate postoperative complication rates (PCRs). We report on improving PCR estimates through use of patient-reporting. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of major surgery performed at 10 UK gynaecological cancer centres was undertaken. Hospitals entered the data contemporaneously into an online database. Patients were sent follow-up letters to capture postoperative complications. Grade II-V (Clavien-Dindo classification) patient-reported postoperative complications were verified from hospital records. Postoperative complication rate was defined as the proportion of surgeries with a Grade II-V postoperative complication. RESULTS: Patient replies were received for 1462 (68%) of 2152 surgeries undertaken between April 2010 and February 2012. Overall, 452 Grade II-V (402 II, 50 III-V) complications were reported in 379 of the 1462 surgeries. This included 172 surgeries with 200 hospital-reported complications and 231 with 280 patient-reported complications. All (100% concordance) 36 Grade III-V and 158 of 280 (56.4% concordance) Grade II patient-reported complications were verified on hospital case-note review. The PCR using hospital-reported data was 11.8% (172 out of 1462; 95% CI 11-14), patient-reported was 15.8% (231 out of 1462; 95% CI 14-17.8), hospital and verified patient-reported was 19.4% (283 out of 1462; 95% CI 17.4-21.4) and all data were 25.9% (379 out of 1462; 95% CI 24-28). After excluding Grade II complications, the hospital and patient verified Grade III-V PCR was 3.3% (48 out of 1462; 95% CI 2.5-4.3). CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study of postoperative complications we are aware of in gynaecological oncology to include the patient-reported data. Patient-reporting is invaluable for obtaining complete information on postoperative complications. Primary care case-note review is likely to improve verification rates of patient-reported Grade II complications.

SUBMITTER: Iyer R 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3738134 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Patient-reporting improves estimates of postoperative complication rates: a prospective cohort study in gynaecological oncology.

Iyer R R   Gentry-Maharaj A A   Nordin A A   Liston R R   Burnell M M   Das N N   Desai R R   Gornall R R   Beardmore-Gray A A   Hillaby K K   Leeson S S   Linder A A   Lopes A A   Meechan D D   Mould T T   Nevin J J   Olaitan A A   Rufford B B   Ryan A A   Shanbhag S S   Thackeray A A   Wood N N   Reynolds K K   Menon U U  

British journal of cancer 20130711 3


<h4>Background</h4>Most studies use hospital data to calculate postoperative complication rates (PCRs). We report on improving PCR estimates through use of patient-reporting.<h4>Methods</h4>A prospective cohort study of major surgery performed at 10 UK gynaecological cancer centres was undertaken. Hospitals entered the data contemporaneously into an online database. Patients were sent follow-up letters to capture postoperative complications. Grade II-V (Clavien-Dindo classification) patient-repo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6379976 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4771505 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8015395 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8620527 | biostudies-literature