Dataset Information

Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

ABSTRACT: Minimum foot clearance (MFC) as it relates to trips and falls has been extensively studied across many locomotor tasks, but examination of this body of research yields several studies with conflicting results and a wide range of MFCs within tasks. While there are several factors that may affect the MFC variability across studies (populations studied, environmental conditions, etc.), one aspect of the discrepancies in the literature may be the result of different placements of shoe markers and/or MFC calculation methods. A marker on the toe is often used, but may only quantify one aspect of how the foot actually clears the trip hazard. The purpose of this study was to determine the location on the shoe where MFC occurs during locomotor tasks with the highest risk of tripping. Ten young adults performed three trials of locomotor tasks which included overground walking, obstacle crossing, level change and stair negotiation. Clearance was calculated for 72 points on each shoe, including those most commonly used in past research. The location of the overall MFC on the shoe sole differed both between limbs and across locomotor tasks. Additionally, the region of the obstacle, step or stair over which the MFC occurred varied both within and across task. Use of this 3D MFC methodology provided further insight into which portions of the shoe may come closest to the tripping hazard. Future research should examine whether the location and value of the MFC changes between different populations, or with environmental modifications.

SUBMITTER: Loverro KL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3747961 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Loverro Kari L KL Mueske Nicole M NM Hamel Kate A KA

Journal of biomechanics 20130605 11

Minimum foot clearance (MFC) as it relates to trips and falls has been extensively studied across many locomotor tasks, but examination of this body of research yields several studies with conflicting results and a wide range of MFCs within tasks. While there are several factors that may affect the MFC variability across studies (populations studied, environmental conditions, etc.), one aspect of the discrepancies in the literature may be the result of different placements of shoe markers and/or ...[more]

PMID: 23747230

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is not well understood how older adults meet the combined locomotor demands of obstacle avoidance at fast speeds as compared to obstacle avoidance under cognitive loads. The purpose of this study was to quantify changes in locomotor stability (margin of stability, MOS) from walking to crossing obstacles at fast speeds versus with added cognitive demands in older adults. Community-dwelling older adults walked on an unobstructed and obstructed path at their preferred speed (preferred); during a dualtask (verbal fluency); and at their 'fastest comfortable' speed (fast). We used motion capture to calculate MOS in the anteroposterior direction, and compared minimum MOS between crossing foot and support phase (lead single support, lead double support, trail single support, trail double support) and tested for within subject changes using a linear mixed effect regression model [Condition (preferred, fluency, fast) x Walkway (unobstructed, obstructed) x Phase (single support, double support) x Foot (lead, trail)]. We examined crossing kinematics (approach distance, toe clearance, and recovery distance) between conditions. A significant omnibus effect partially supported our predictions. A Condition x Walkway x Phase interaction supported that older adults increased stability under a cognitive load and prioritized stability, demonstrated by not changing MOS from walking to obstacle crossing. During fast obstacle crossing they decreased stability during double support and exhibit more stability in single support, when vulnerable to external perturbations (contacting the obstacle). During a dual-task, older adults took shorter and higher steps over the obstacle to ensure they cleared it safely, but at fast speeds they increased the length of their crossing step without higher toe clearance. The results suggest older adults attempt to preserve stability when crossing obstacles under both cognitive and speed demands, but may be unable to ensure a safer limb elevation to avoid obstacles at fast speeds as they do under cognitive demands.

Project description:BackgroundIll-fitting footwear is a common problem in older people. The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of shoe fitting in older people by comparing the dimensions of allocated shoes to foot dimensions obtained with a three-dimensional (3D) scanner.MethodsThe shoe sizes of 56 older people were determined with the Brannock device®, and weightbearing foot scans were obtained with the FotoScan 3D scanner (Precision 3D Ltd, Weston-super-mare, UK). Participants were provided with a pair of shoes (Dr Comfort®, Vista, CA, USA), available in three width fittings (medium, wide and extra wide). The dimensions (length, ball width and ball girth) of the allocated shoes were documented according to the last measurements provided by the manufacturer. Mean differences between last dimensions and foot dimensions obtained with the 3D scanner were calculated to provide an indication of shoe fitting accuracy. Participants were also asked to report their perception of shoe fit and comfort, using 100 mm visual analogue scales (VAS).ResultsShoe size ranged from US size 7 to 14 for men and 5.5 to 11 for women. The allocated shoes were significantly longer than the foot (mean 23.6 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.1 to 25.2; t55?=?30.3, p?<?0.001), however there were no significant differences in relation to ball width (mean 1.4 mm, 95% CI -0.1 to 2.9 mm; t55?=?1.9, p?=?0.066) or ball girth (mean -0.7 mm, 95% CI -6.1 to 4.8 mm; t55?=?-0.2, p?=?0.810). Participants reported favourable perceptions of shoe fit (mean VAS?=?90.7 mm, 95% CI 88.4 to 93.1 mm) and comfort (mean VAS?=?88.4 mm, 95% CI 85.0 to 91.8 mm).ConclusionShoe size selection using the Brannock device® resulted in the allocation of shoes with last dimensions that were well matched to the dimensions of the foot. Participants also considered the shoes to be well fitted and comfortable. Older people with disabling foot pain can therefore be dispensed with appropriately-fitted shoes using this technique, provided that the style and materials used are suitable and extra width fittings are available.

Project description:Horse racing is a multi-billion-dollar industry that has raised welfare concerns due to injured and euthanized animals. Whilst the cause of musculoskeletal injuries that lead to horse morbidity and mortality is multifactorial, pre-existing pathologies, increased speeds and substrate of the racecourse are likely contributors to foot disease. Horse hooves have the ability to naturally deform during locomotion and dissipate locomotor stresses, yet farriery approaches are utilised to increase performance and protect hooves from wear. Previous studies have assessed the effect of different shoe designs on locomotor performance; however, no biomechanical study has hitherto measured the effect of horseshoes on the stresses of the foot skeleton in vivo. This preliminary study introduces a novel methodology combining three-dimensional data from biplanar radiography with inverse dynamics methods and finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the effect of a stainless steel shoe on the function of a Thoroughbred horse's forefoot during walking. Our preliminary results suggest that the stainless steel shoe shifts craniocaudal, mediolateral and vertical GRFs at mid-stance. We document a similar pattern of flexion-extension in the PIP (pastern) and DIP (coffin) joints between the unshod and shod conditions, with slight variation in rotation angles throughout the stance phase. For both conditions, the PIP and DIP joints begin in a flexed posture and extend over the entire stance phase. At mid-stance, small differences in joint angle are observed in the PIP joint, with the shod condition being more extended than the unshod horse, whereas the DIP joint is extended more in the unshod than the shod condition. We also document that the DIP joint extends more than the PIP after mid-stance and until the end of the stance in both conditions. Our FEA analysis, conducted solely on the bones, shows increased von Mises and Maximum principal stresses on the forefoot phalanges in the shod condition at mid-stance, consistent with the tentative conclusion that a steel shoe might increase mechanical loading. However, because of our limited sample size none of these apparent differences have been tested for statistical significance. Our preliminary study illustrates how the shoe may influence the dynamics and mechanics of a Thoroughbred horse's forefoot during slow walking, but more research is needed to quantify the effect of the shoe on the equine forefoot during the whole stance phase, at faster speeds/gaits and with more individuals as well as with a similar focus on the hind feet. We anticipate that our preliminary analysis using advanced methodological approaches will pave the way for new directions in research on the form/function relationship of the equine foot, with the ultimate goal to minimise foot injuries and improve animal health and welfare.

Dataset Information

Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Publications

Location of minimum foot clearance on the shoe and with respect to the obstacle changes with locomotor task.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets