Dataset Information

Treatment course with antidepressant therapy in late-life depression.

ABSTRACT: In order to assess the effect of gray matter volumes and cortical thickness on antidepressant treatment response in late-life depression, the authors examined the relationship between brain regions identified a priori and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over the course of an antidepressant treatment trial.In a nonrandomized prospective trial, 168 patients who were at least 60 years of age and met DSM-IV criteria for major depression underwent MRI and were enrolled in a 12-week treatment study. Exclusion criteria included cognitive impairment or severe medical disorders. The volumes or cortical thicknesses of regions of interest that differed between the depressed group and a comparison group (N=50) were determined. These regions of interest were used in analyses of the depressed group to predict antidepressant treatment outcome. Mixed-model analyses adjusting for age, education, age at depression onset, race, baseline MADRS score, scanner, and interaction with time examined predictors of MADRS scores over time.Smaller hippocampal volumes predicted a slower response to treatment. With the inclusion of white matter hyper-intensity severity and neuropsychological factor scores, the best model included hippocampal volume and cognitive processing speed to predict rate of response over time. A secondary analysis showed that hippocampal volume and frontal pole thickness differed between patients who achieved remission and those who did not.These data expand our understanding of the prediction of treatment course in late-life depression. The authors propose that the primary variables of hippocampal volume and cognitive processing speed, subsuming other contributing variables (episodic memory, executive function, language processing) predict antidepressant response.

SUBMITTER: Sheline YI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3752387 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Treatment course with antidepressant therapy in late-life depression.

Sheline Yvette I YI Disabato Brianne M BM Hranilovich Jennifer J Morris Carrie C D'Angelo Gina G Pieper Carl C Toffanin Tommaso T Taylor Warren D WD MacFall James R JR Wilkins Consuelo C Barch Deanna M DM Welsh-Bohmer Kathleen A KA Steffens David C DC Krishnan Ranga R RR Doraiswamy P Murali PM

The American journal of psychiatry 20121101 11

<h4>Objective</h4>In order to assess the effect of gray matter volumes and cortical thickness on antidepressant treatment response in late-life depression, the authors examined the relationship between brain regions identified a priori and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over the course of an antidepressant treatment trial.<h4>Method</h4>In a nonrandomized prospective trial, 168 patients who were at least 60 years of age and met DSM-IV criteria for major depression under ...[more]

PMID: 23534057

Similar Datasets

Project description:ContextResearch on vascular depression has used 2 approaches to subtype late-life depression, based on executive dysfunction or white matter hyperintensity severity.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship of neuropsychological performance and white matter hyperintensity with clinical response in late-life depression.DesignTwo-site, prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial.SettingOutpatient clinics at Washington University and Duke University.ParticipantsA total of 217 subjects aged 60 years or older met DSM-IV criteria for major depression, scored 20 or more on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and received vascular risk factor scores, neuropsychological testing, and magnetic resonance imaging; they were excluded for cognitive impairment or severe medical disorders. Fazekas rating was conducted to grade white matter hyperintensity lesions. Intervention Twelve weeks of sertraline treatment, titrated by clinical response. Main Outcome Measure Participants' MADRS scores over time.ResultsBaseline neuropsychological factor scores correlated negatively with baseline Fazekas scores. A mixed model examined effects of predictor variables on MADRS scores over time. Baseline episodic memory (P = .002), language (P = .007), working memory (P = .01), processing speed (P < .001), executive function factor scores (P = .002), and categorical Fazekas ratings (P = .05) predicted MADRS scores, controlling for age, education, age of onset, and race. Controlling for baseline MADRS scores, these factors remained significant predictors of decrease in MADRS scores, except for working memory and Fazekas ratings. Thirty-three percent of subjects achieved remission (MADRS < or =7). Remitters differed from nonremitters in baseline cognitive processing speed, executive function, language, episodic memory, and vascular risk factor scores.ConclusionsComprehensive neuropsychological function and white matter hyperintensity severity predicted MADRS scores prospectively over a 12-week treatment course with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in late-life depression. Baseline neuropsychological function differentiated remitters from nonremitters and predicted time to remission in a proportional hazards model. Predictor variables correlated highly with vascular risk factor severity. These data support the vascular depression hypothesis and highlight the importance of linking subtypes based on neuropsychological function and white matter integrity.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00045773.

Project description:Late-life depression frequently co-occurs with cognitive impairment. To inform clinical management of these conditions, we examined the hypotheses that, relative to cognitively normal elders meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder, those with cognitive impairment would require greater intensity of pharmacotherapy to reach criteria for antidepressant response and would take longer to respond.Using data from the MTLD-3 study, we conducted a series of secondary analyses examining the implications of cognitive impairment for short-term, open-trial pharmacotherapy of late-life depression (major depressive disorder in individuals 65 years and older). The treatment algorithm consisted of 3 steps: initial treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), a switch to a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) if the patient did not respond, and addition of an atypical antipsychotic if the patient did not respond to the SNRI. The first subject entered the protocol in April 2004, and the last subject exited in September 2009. We examined data for participants who completed the acute phase of MTLD-3 as responders and received a cognitive diagnosis (N = 153) based on National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set criteria. We divided participants into 3 groups on the basis of NACC cognitive diagnosis: no cognitive disorder (n = 74), mild cognitive impairment (n = 60), and dementia (n = 19). For each group, we calculated the proportion of participants requiring first- (SSRI), second- (SNRI), or third-step (add-on atypical antipsychotic) treatment to meet criteria for response (17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ? 10 for 3 consecutive weeks). We compared time to response across groups and correlates of nonresponse.The 3 groups did not differ in intensity of pharmacotherapy (P = .68) or time to response (P = .84). Nonresponse was more strongly correlated with longer major depressive episode duration (P = .0015), presence of recurrent depression (P = .002), and younger current age (P = .047), rather than cognitive status (P = .61).Cognitive status does not appear to impact short-term pharmacotherapy response variability in individuals whose depression responds to treatment with open-trial antidepressants delivered in a supportive, university-based medication clinic.

Dataset Information

Treatment course with antidepressant therapy in late-life depression.

Publications

Treatment course with antidepressant therapy in late-life depression.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets