Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Association between sleep duration and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Sleep duration has been shown to play an important role in the development of cancer. However, the results have been inconsistent. A meta-analysis with prospective cohort studies was performed to clarify the association between short or long sleep duration and cancer risk.

Methods

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible publications. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random- or fixed- model.

Results

A total of 10 prospective studies (8392 incident cases and 555678 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Neither short nor long sleep duration was statistically associated with increased risk of cancer (short sleep duration: RR=1.05, 95%CI=0.90-1.24, p=0.523; long sleep duration: RR=0.92, 95%CI=0.76-1.12, p=0.415). In the subgroup by cancer type, long sleep duration was positively associated with colorectal cancer (RR=1.29, 95%CI=1.09-1.52, p=0.003).

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis suggested that neither short nor long sleep duration was significantly associated with risk of cancer, although long sleep duration increased risk of with colorectal cancer. Large-scale well-design prospective studies are required to be conducted to further investigate the observed association.

SUBMITTER: Lu Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3762769 | biostudies-literature | 2013

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Association between sleep duration and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Lu Yan Y   Tian Nong N   Yin Jie J   Shi Yuhua Y   Huang Zhenping Z  

PloS one 20130904 9


<h4>Background</h4>Sleep duration has been shown to play an important role in the development of cancer. However, the results have been inconsistent. A meta-analysis with prospective cohort studies was performed to clarify the association between short or long sleep duration and cancer risk.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible publications. Pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random- or fixed- model.<h4>Results</h4>A  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4761879 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3819519 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7527363 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4633618 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5663611 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8479110 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3581483 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4188921 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5735405 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5514030 | biostudies-literature