Dataset Information

High frequency oscillations (80-500 Hz) in the preictal period in patients with focal seizures.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Intracranial depth macroelectrode recordings from patients with focal seizures demonstrate interictal and ictal high frequency oscillations (HFOs, 80-500 Hz). These HFOs are more frequent in the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) and reported to be linked to seizure genesis. We evaluated whether HFO activity changes in a systematic way during the preictal period.

Methods

Fifteen minutes of preictal intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings were evaluated in seven consecutive patients with well-defined SOZ. EEG was filtered at 500 Hz and sampled at 2,000 Hz. Ripples (80-250 Hz) and fast ripples (250-500 Hz) were visually marked, and spectral analysis was performed in seizure-onset as well as nonseizure-onset channels. Linear regressions fitted to the power trends corresponding to intervals of 1, 5, and 15 min before the seizure onset was calculated.

Results

Total rates of HFOs were significantly higher in the SOZ than outside. Preictal increases and decreases in HFO rates and band power could be detected in all patients, and they were not limited to the SOZs. These measures were very variable, and no systematic trends were observed when comparing patients or seizures in the same patient.

Discussion

High frequencies in the range of 80-500 Hz are present during the preictal period and are more prominent in the SOZ. They do not change in a systematic way before seizure onset for the horizons we tested. The 80-500 Hz band may be used for the localization of seizure-onset areas but may be more difficult to use for seizure prediction purposes.

SUBMITTER: Jacobs J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3764053 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Simultaneous scalp EEG/functional MRI measures non-invasively haemodynamic responses to interictal epileptic discharges, which are related to the epileptogenic zone. High frequency oscillations are also an excellent indicator of this zone, but are primarily recorded from intracerebral EEG. We studied the spatial overlap of these two important markers in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to assess if their combination could help better define the extent of the epileptogenic zone. We included patients who underwent EEG-functional MRI and later intracerebral EEG. Based on intracerebral EEG findings, we separated patients with unifocal seizures from patients with multifocal or unknown onset seizures. Haemodynamic t-maps were coregistered with the intracerebral electrode positions. Each EEG channel was classified as pertaining to one of the following categories: primary haemodynamic cluster (maximum t-value), secondary cluster (t-value > 90% of the primary cluster) or outside the primary and secondary clusters. We marked high frequency oscillations (ripples: 80-250 Hz; fast ripples: 250-500 Hz) during 1 h of slow wave sleep, and compared their rates in each haemodynamic category. After classifying channels as high- or low-rate, the proportion of high-rate channels within the primary or primary plus secondary clusters was compared to the proportion expected by chance. Twenty-five patients, 11 with unifocal and 14 with multifocal/unknown seizure onsets, were studied. We found a significantly higher median high frequency oscillation rate in the primary cluster compared to secondary cluster and outside these two clusters for the unifocal group (P < 0.0001), but not for the multifocal/unknown group. For the unifocal group, the number of high-rate channels within the primary or primary plus secondary clusters was significantly higher than expected by chance. This held only for the high-ripple-rate channels in the multifocal/unknown group. At the patient level, most patients (18/25, or 72%) had at least one high-rate channel within a primary cluster. In patients with unifocal epilepsy, the maximum haemodynamic response (primary cluster) related to scalp interictal discharges overlaps with the tissue generating high frequency oscillations at high rates. If intracranial EEG is warranted, this response should be explored. As a tentative clinical use of the combination of these techniques we propose that higher high frequency oscillation rates inside than outside the maximum response indicates that the patient has indeed a focal epileptogenic zone demarcated by this response, whereas similar rates inside and outside may indicate a widespread epileptogenic zone or an epileptogenic zone not covered by the implantation.

Project description:It is generally understood that there is a preictal phase in the development of a seizure and this precictal period is the basis for seizure prediction attempts. The focus of this study is the preictal global spatiotemporal dynamics and its intra-patient variability. We analyzed preictal broadband brain connectivity from human electrocorticography (ECoG) recordings of 185 seizures (which included 116 clinical seizures) collected from 12 patients. ECoG electrodes record from only a part of the cortex, leaving large regions of the brain unobserved. Brain connectivity was therefore estimated using the sparse-plus-latent-regularized precision matrix (SLRPM) method, which calculates connectivity from partial correlations of the conditional statistics of the observed regions given the unobserved latent regions. Brain connectivity was quantified using eigenvector centrality (EC), from which a degree of heterogeneity was calculated for the preictal periods of all seizures in each patient. Results from the SLRPM method are compared to those from the sparse-regularized precision matrix (SRPM) and correlation methods, which do not account for the unobserved inputs when estimating brain connectivity. The degree of heterogeneity estimated by the SLRPM method is higher than those estimated by the SRPM and correlation methods for the preictal periods in most patients. These results reveal substantial heterogeneity or desynchronization among brain areas in the preictal period of human epileptic seizures. Furthermore, the SLRPM method identifies more onset channels from the preictal active electrodes compared to the SRPM and correlation methods. Finally, the correlation between the degree of heterogeneity and seizure severity of patients for SLRPM and SRPM methods were lower than that obtained from the correlation method. These results support recent findings suggesting that inhibitory neurons can have anti-seizure effects by inducing variability or heterogeneity across seizures. Understanding how this variability is linked to seizure initiation may lead to better predictions and controlling therapies.