Dataset Information

Context dependent memory in two learning environments: the tutorial room and the operating theatre.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Psychologists have previously demonstrated that information recall is context dependent. However, how this influences the way we deliver medical education is unclear. This study aimed to determine if changing the recall context from the learning context affects the ability of medical students to recall information.

Methods

Using a free recall experimental model, fourteen medical student participants were administered audio lists of 30 words in two separate learning environments, a tutorial room and an operating theatre. They were then asked to recall the words in both environments. While in the operating theatre participants wore appropriate surgical clothing and assembled around an operating table. While in the tutorial room, participants dressed casually and were seated around a table. Students experienced the same duration (15 minutes) and disruption in both environments.

Results

The mean recall score from the 28 tests performed in the same environment was 12.96 +/- 3.93 (mean, SD). The mean recall score from the 28 tests performed in an alternative environment to the learning episode was 13.5 +/- 5.31(mean, SD), indicating that changing the recall environment from the learning environment does not cause any statistical difference (p=0.58). The average recall score of participants who learned and recalled in the tutorial room was 13.0 +/- 3.84 (mean, SD). The average recall score of participants who learnt and recalled in the operating theatre was 12.92 +/- 4.18 (mean, SD), representing no significant difference between the two environments for learning (p=0.4792).

Conclusions

The results support the continued use of tutorial rooms and operating theatres as appropriate environments in which to teach medical students, with no significant difference in information recall seen either due to a same context effect or specific context effect.

SUBMITTER: Coveney AP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3766034 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Context dependent memory in two learning environments: the tutorial room and the operating theatre.

Coveney Andrew P AP Switzer Timothy T Corrigan Mark A MA Redmond Henry P HP

BMC medical education 20130901

<h4>Background</h4>Psychologists have previously demonstrated that information recall is context dependent. However, how this influences the way we deliver medical education is unclear. This study aimed to determine if changing the recall context from the learning context affects the ability of medical students to recall information.<h4>Methods</h4>Using a free recall experimental model, fourteen medical student participants were administered audio lists of 30 words in two separate learning envi ...[more]

PMID: 24127650

Similar Datasets

Project description:Several studies have reported on the negative impact of interruptions and distractions on anaesthetic, surgical and team performance in the operating theatre. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of these events and why they remain part of everyday clinical practice. We used a mixed methods observational study design. We scored each distractor and interruption according to an established scheme during induction of anaesthesia and the surgical procedure for 58 general surgical cases requiring general anaesthesia. We made field notes of observations, small conversations and meetings. We observed 64 members of staff for 148 hours and recorded 4594 events, giving a mean (SD) event rate of 32.8 (16.3) h-1 . The most frequent events observed during induction of anaesthesia were door movements, which accounted for 869 (63%) events, giving a mean (SD) event rate of 28.1 (14.5) h-1 . These, however, had little impact. The most common events observed during surgery were case-irrelevant verbal communication and smartphone usage, which accounted for 1020 (32%) events, giving a mean (SD) event rate of 9.0 (4.2) h-1 . These occurred mostly in periods of low work-load in a sub-team. Participants ranged from experiencing these events as severe disruption through to a welcome distraction that served to keep healthcare professionals active during low work-load, as well as reinforcing the social connections between colleagues. Mostly, team members showed no awareness of the need for silence among other sub-teams and did not vocalise the need for silence to others. Case-irrelevant verbal communication and smartphone usage may serve a physical and psychological need. The extent to which healthcare professionals may feel disrupted depends on the situation and context. When a team member was disrupted, a resilient team response often lacked. Reducing disruptive social activity might be a powerful strategy to develop a habit of cross-monitoring and mutual help across surgical and anaesthetic sub-teams. Further research is needed on how to bridge cultural borders and develop resilient interprofessional behaviours.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Accurate estimation of operative case-time duration is critical for optimizing operating room use. Current estimates are inaccurate and earlier models include data not available at the time of scheduling. Our objective was to develop statistical models in a large retrospective data set to improve estimation of case-time duration relative to current standards. STUDY DESIGN:We developed models to predict case-time duration using linear regression and supervised machine learning. For each of these models, we generated an all-inclusive model, service-specific models, and surgeon-specific models. In the latter 2 approaches, individual models were created for each surgical service and surgeon, respectively. Our data set included 46,986 scheduled operations performed at a large academic medical center from January 2014 to December 2017, with 80% used for training and 20% for model testing/validation. Predictions derived from each model were compared with our institutional standard of using average historic procedure times and surgeon estimates. Models were evaluated based on accuracy, overage (case duration > predicted + 10%), underage (case duration < predicted - 10%), and the predictive capability of being within a 10% tolerance threshold. RESULTS:The machine learning algorithm resulted in the highest predictive capability. The surgeon-specific model was superior to the service-specific model, with higher accuracy, lower percentage of overage and underage, and higher percentage of cases within the 10% threshold. The ability to predict cases within 10% improved from 32% using our institutional standard to 39% with the machine learning surgeon-specific model. CONCLUSIONS:Our study is a notable advancement toward statistical modeling of case-time duration across all surgical departments in a large tertiary medical center. Machine learning approaches can improve case duration estimations, enabling improved operating room scheduling, efficiency, and reduced costs.

Project description:BackgroundOperating theatre personnel are at increased risk for transmission of blood borne pathogens when passing sharp instruments. The hands-free technique, whereby a tray or other means are used to eliminate simultaneous handling of sharp instruments, has been recommended.AimsTo prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing the incidence of percutaneous injuries, contaminations, and glove tears arising from handling sharp instruments.MethodsFor each of 3765 operations carried out in main and surgical day care operating theatres in a large urban hospital, over six months, circulating nurses recorded the proportion of use of the hands-free technique during each operation, as well as other features of the operation. The hands-free technique, considered to be used when 75% or more of the passes in an operation were done in this way, was used in 42% of operations. The relative rate of incidents (percutaneous injuries, contaminations, and glove tears) in operations where the hands-free technique was used and not used, with adjustment via multiple logistic regression for the different risk profiles of the two sets of operations, was calculated.ResultsA total of 143 incidents (40 percutaneous injuries, 51 contaminations, and 52 glove tears) were reported. In operations with greater than 100 ml blood loss, the incident rate was 4% (18/486) when the hands-free technique was used and 10% (90/880) when it was not, approximately 60% less. When adjusted for differences in type and duration of surgery, emergency status, noisiness, time of day, and number present for 75% of the operation, the reduction in the rate was 59% (95% CI 23% to 72%). In operations with less than 100 ml blood loss, the corresponding rates were 1.4% (15/1051) when the hands-free technique was used and 1.5% (19/1259) when it was not used. Adjustment for differences in risk factors did not alter the difference.ConclusionsAlthough not effective in all operations, use of the hands-free technique was effective in operations with more substantial blood loss.

Dataset Information

Context dependent memory in two learning environments: the tutorial room and the operating theatre.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Context dependent memory in two learning environments: the tutorial room and the operating theatre.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets