RET fusion genes in Korean non-small cell lung cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yoo SS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC3795183 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
RET fusion genes in Korean non-small cell lung cancer.
Yoo Seung Soo SS Jin Guang G Jung Hye Jin HJ Hong Mi Jeong MJ Choi Jin Eun JE Jeon Hyo-Sung HS Lee Shin Yup SY Lim Jeong Ok JO Park Jae Yong JY
Journal of Korean medical science 20130925 10
Recently, rearranged during transfection (RET) fusions have been identified in approximately 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To know the prevalence of RET fusion genes in Korean NSCLCs, we examined the RET fusion genes in 156 surgically resected NSCLCs using a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Two KIF5B-RET fusions and one CCDC6-RET fusion were identified. All three patients were females and never smokers with adenocarcinomas. RET fusion genes were mutually exclusive fro ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Great progress has been made in the treatment of driver gene-positive Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in recent years. RET fusion was seen in 0.7% to 2% of NSCLC and was associated with younger age and never-smoker status. The pralsetinib and selpercatinib for RET fusion NSCLC was recommended by the 2021 NSCLC treatment guidelines. This review outlines the research progress in the treatment of RET fusion NSCLC, identifies current challenges and describes proposals for improving the outlook for these patients.
| S-EPMC9190697 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRET fusions are oncogenic drivers in 1 to 2% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). In patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibition are unknown.MethodsWe enrolled patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated separately in a phase 1-2 trial of selpercatinib. The primary end point was an objective response (a complete or partial response) as determined by an independent review committee. Secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety.ResultsIn the first 105 consecutively enrolled patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received at least platinum-based chemotherapy, the percentage with an objective response was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 73). The median duration of response was 17.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to could not be evaluated), and 63% of the responses were ongoing at a median follow-up of 12.1 months. Among 39 previously untreated patients, the percentage with an objective response was 85% (95% CI, 70 to 94), and 90% of the responses were ongoing at 6 months. Among 11 patients with measurable central nervous system metastasis at enrollment, the percentage with an objective intracranial response was 91% (95% CI, 59 to 100). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were hypertension (in 14% of the patients), an increased alanine aminotransferase level (in 12%), an increased aspartate aminotransferase level (in 10%), hyponatremia (in 6%), and lymphopenia (in 6%). A total of 12 of 531 patients (2%) discontinued selpercatinib because of a drug-related adverse event.ConclusionsSelpercatinib had durable efficacy, including intracranial activity, with mainly low-grade toxic effects in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and those who were previously untreated. (Funded by Loxo Oncology and others; LIBRETTO-001 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03157128.).
| S-EPMC7506467 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusions are a validated target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RET-selective inhibitors selpercatinib (LOXO-292) and pralsetinib (BLU-667) recently demonstrated favorable antitumor activity and safety profiles in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and both have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Insights into mechanisms of resistance to selective RET inhibitors remain limited.Patients and methodsThis study was performed at five institutions. Tissue and/or cell-free DNA was obtained from patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC after treatment with selpercatinib or pralsetinib and assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) or MET FISH.ResultsWe analyzed a total of 23 post-treatment tissue and/or plasma biopsies from 18 RET fusion-positive patients who received an RET-selective inhibitor (selpercatinib, n = 10; pralsetinib, n = 7; pralsetinib followed by selpercatinib, n = 1, with biopsy after each inhibitor). Three cases had paired tissue and plasma samples, of which one also had two serial resistant tissue specimens. The median progression-free survival on RET inhibitors was 6.3 months [95% confidence interval 3.6-10.8 months]. Acquired RET mutations were identified in two cases (10%), both affecting the RET G810 residue in the kinase solvent front. Three resistant cases (15%) harbored acquired MET amplification without concurrent RET resistance mutations, and one specimen had acquired KRAS amplification. No other canonical driver alterations were identified by NGS. Among 16 resistant tumor specimens, none had evidence of squamous or small-cell histologic transformation.ConclusionsRET solvent front mutations are a recurrent mechanism of RET inhibitor resistance, although they occurred at a relatively low frequency. The majority of resistance to selective RET inhibition may be driven by RET-independent resistance such as acquired MET or KRAS amplification. Next-generation RET inhibitors with potency against RET resistance mutations and combination strategies are needed to effectively overcome resistance in these patients.
| S-EPMC9538591 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RET rearrangements are observed in 1-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and result in the constitutive activation of downstream pathways normally implied in cell proliferation, growth, differentiation and survival. In NSCLC patients, RET rearrangements have been associated with a history of non-smoking, a higher rate of brain metastasis at initial diagnosis and a low immune infiltrate. Traditionally, RET fusions are considered mutually exclusive with other oncogenic drivers, even though a co-occurrence with EGFR mutations and MET amplifications has been observed. Cabozantinib, vandetanib and lenvatinib are the first multi-kinase inhibitors tested in RET-rearranged NSCLC patients with contrasting results. More recently, two selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, demonstrated higher efficacy rates and good tolerability and they were approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC on the bases of the results of phase II studies. Two ongoing phase III clinical trials are currently comparing selpercatinib or pralsetinib to standard first line treatments and will definitively establish their efficacy in RET-positive NSCLC patients.
| S-EPMC8431193 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive occurs in approximately 2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This mutation often predicts metastasis risk and poor prognosis, and current mainstream therapies provide limited patient benefit. Selective RET inhibitors Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib are targeted drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating RET-mutated tumors. The phase I/II clinical trial results of their treatment of NSCLC have been published. However, the clinical effect of selective RET inhibitors on RET fusion-positive NSCLC remains controversial. Purpose Meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibitors in treating RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Methods Qualified literature was searched in Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), intracranial ORR, and adverse events. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze the data. Results A total of 8 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results showed that the ORR of patients treated with selective RET inhibitors was 67% (95% confidence interval:0.64 to 0.70, P < 0.01), DCR was 92% (95%CI: 0.91-0.94, P < 0.01), the mPFS was 16.09 months (95%CI: 11.66-20.52, P < 0.01). In treated patients with RET mutation, the intracranial ORR was 86% (95%CI:0.74 ~ 0.96, P < 0.01). ORR in untreated patients was more effective than untreated patients [HR = 0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56, P < 0.01)]. The major adverse events (grade 3-4) are neutropenia (13%) and anaemia (13%). Conclusions Selective RET inhibitors Pralsetinib and Selpercatinib have shown a good effect on RET fusion-positive NSCLC, with a low incidence of adverse events.
| S-EPMC10560178 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RationaleLung cancer is a series of gene-driven disease. EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 are 3 major driver genes that play an important role in lung cancer development and precision management. Additionally, rare genetic alterations continue to be discovered and may become novel targets for therapy. The RET gene is one of such rare genetic alteration of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this report, we present a RET-positive case that benefited from cabozantinib treatment.Patient concernA 50-year-old male patient was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma 2 years ago, at that time he received palliative surgery of pulmonary carcinoma and completed 4 cycles of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Six months later, he was hospitalized in our cancer center due to the disease recurrence, presenting with pleural metastasis.DiagnosisGene alteration was examined using the intraoperative specimen by PCR method, and KIF5B/RET gene fusion was detected. Therefore, the patient was diagnosed with late-stage lung adenocarcinoma with RET gene mutation.InterventionsThe patient received treatment with cabozantinib from June 2017.OutcomesCabozantinib was administered (140 mg orally, once daily) for approximate 9 months, and his disease achieved stable disease (SD). During that period, there were no severe adverse events (AE), except for a grade II rash (CTCAE 4.0).LessonsWe found that the RET fusion gene is a novel driver molecular of lung adenocarcinoma in patients without common mutations in such genes as EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. This case report supports a rationale for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma patients with a RET fusion and provides alternative treatment options for these types of NSCLC patients.
| S-EPMC6370068 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion is a target for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, and RET inhibitors are approved for advanced NSCLC. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in RET fusion-positive NSCLC remains controversial. This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of ICIs and RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC.MethodsData from patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion from Jan 2017 to Sep 2021 were analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ICIs and RET inhibitors treatments were collected.ResultsSeventy-five patients with RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC were identified. The median age of patients was 57 years, half of the patients were female (50.3%), and most were non-smokers or light smokers (72%). Of the cancer types diagnosed in study patients, the KIF5B-RET fusion subtype accounted for 73.3% (55/75), twelve patients (16%) had CCDC6-RET fusion, and three (4%) had NCOA4-RET fusion. Sixteen patients were treated with ICIs. In previously untreated patients, we observed an objective response rate (ORR) of 71.4% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 7.5 months in seven assessable patients. Of four patients with PD-L1 overexpression (>50%) one received pembrolizumab and the other three patients received pemetrexed, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab. In these patients, the ORR was 75% and disease control rate was 100%. Fifteen patients received selective RET inhibitors (pralsetinib and selpercatinib), resulting in an ORR of 53.3% (8/15) and median PFS of 10.0 months (95% CI 5.2-14.9).ConclusionsICIs for PD-L overexpression and treatment naive patients offer comparable benefits for RET fusion-positive NSCLC, warranting further investigation.
| S-EPMC10831772 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The identification of oncogenic drivers, and the subsequent development of targeted therapies established biomarker-based care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Biomarker testing is standard of care in NSCLC patients with adenocarcinoma because multiple targeted therapies are available. Rearranged during transfection (RET) rearrangements were identified as oncogenic drivers in NSCLC, and are more common among younger patients, adenocarcinoma histology, and patients with a history of never smoking. The prevalence is estimated to be 1-2% among patients with adenocarcinoma histology. The most common rearrangement is between intron 11 of the RET gene and intron 15 of the KIF5B gene, and the next most frequent rearrangement is with the CCDC6 gene. RET rearrangements lead to constitutive activation of the RET tyrosine kinase and increased cell proliferation, migration, and survival. Phase II studies investigated the activity of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with NSCLC with a confirmed RET rearrangement. These agents have limited potency against RET, and activity against the epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways. These agents revealed modest activity, and were poorly tolerated due to the off-target toxicities. These struggles contributed to the development of more potent and specific RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Preliminary results from early phase trials of selpercatinib (LOXO-292) and pralsetinib (BLU-667) revealed promising efficacy and improved tolerability. The availability of these agents will make routine testing for RET rearrangements a priority.
| S-EPMC7385825 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Precision oncology is now the evidence-based standard of care for the management of many advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Notably, new molecular profiling technologies have permitted dynamic growth in the identification of actionable driver oncogenes including RET rearrangements. RET oncogenes cannot be adequately detected by immunohistochemistry, although fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing are complementary diagnostic tools. In the clinical setting, the benefit of the most developed RET inhibitors, i.e., cabozantinb, vandetanib and lenvatinb, in terms of response and median progressionfree survival has been demonstrated. The absence of striking clinical results of RET inhibitors underscores the clear need for development of more selective and potent RET inhibitors. This paper reviews the clinical data available on RET inhibitors in RET-associated NSCLC.
| S-EPMC6065052 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene is one of the receptor tyrosine kinases and cell-surface molecules responsible for transmitting signals that regulate cell growth and differentiation. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion is a rare driver gene alteration associated with a poor prognosis. Fortunately, two selective RET inhibitors (sRETi), namely pralsetinib and selpercatinib, have been approved for treating RET fusion NSCLC due to their remarkable efficacy and safety profiles. These inhibitors have shown the ability to overcome resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are investigating several second-generation sRETis that are specifically designed to target solvent front mutations, which pose a challenge for first-generation sRETis. The effective screening of patients is the first crucial step in the clinical application of RET-targeted therapy. Currently, four methods are widely used for detecting gene rearrangements: next-generation sequencing (NGS), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations. To streamline the clinical workflow and improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for RET fusion NSCLC, our expert group has reached a consensus. Our objective is to maximize the clinical benefit for patients and promote standardized approaches to RET fusion screening and therapy.
| S-EPMC10626248 | biostudies-literature