Dataset Information

A European inventory of common electronic health record data elements for clinical trial feasibility.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Clinical studies are a necessity for new medications and therapies. Many studies, however, struggle to meet their recruitment numbers in time or have problems in meeting them at all. With increasing numbers of electronic health records (EHRs) in hospitals, huge databanks emerge that could be utilized to support research. The Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI) funded project 'Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research' (EHR4CR) created a standardized and homogenous inventory of data elements to support research by utilizing EHRs. Our aim was to develop a Data Inventory that contains elements required for site feasibility analysis. METHODS: The Data Inventory was created in an iterative, consensus driven approach, by a group of up to 30 people consisting of pharmaceutical experts and informatics specialists. An initial list was subsequently expanded by data elements of simplified eligibility criteria from clinical trial protocols. Each element was manually reviewed by pharmaceutical experts and standard definitions were identified and added. To verify their availability, data exports of the source systems at eleven university hospitals throughout Europe were conducted and evaluated. RESULTS: The Data Inventory consists of 75 data elements that, on the one hand are frequently used in clinical studies, and on the other hand are available in European EHR systems. Rankings of data elements were created from the results of the data exports. In addition a sub-list was created with 21 data elements that were separated from the Data Inventory because of their low usage in routine documentation. CONCLUSION: The data elements in the Data Inventory were identified with the knowledge of domain experts from pharmaceutical companies. Currently, not all information that is frequently used in site feasibility is documented in routine patient care.

SUBMITTER: Doods J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3895709 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A European inventory of common electronic health record data elements for clinical trial feasibility.

Doods Justin J Botteri Florence F Dugas Martin M Fritz Fleur F

Trials 20140110

<h4>Background</h4>Clinical studies are a necessity for new medications and therapies. Many studies, however, struggle to meet their recruitment numbers in time or have problems in meeting them at all. With increasing numbers of electronic health records (EHRs) in hospitals, huge databanks emerge that could be utilized to support research. The Innovative Medicine Initiative (IMI) funded project 'Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research' (EHR4CR) created a standardized and homogenous inven ...[more]

PMID: 24410735

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveCommon data elements (CDEs) are standardized questions and answer choices that allow aggregation, analysis, and comparison of observations from multiple sources. Clinical CDEs are foundational for learning health care systems, a data-driven approach to health care focused on continuous improvement of outcomes. We aimed to create clinical CDEs for pediatric epilepsy.MethodsA multiple stakeholder group (clinicians, researchers, parents, caregivers, advocates, and electronic health record [EHR] vendors) developed clinical CDEs for routine care of children with epilepsy. Initial drafts drew from clinical epilepsy note templates, CDEs created for clinical research, items in existing registries, consensus documents and guidelines, quality metrics, and outcomes needed for demonstration projects. The CDEs were refined through discussion and field testing. We describe the development process, rationale for CDE selection, findings from piloting, and the CDEs themselves. We also describe early implementation, including experience with EHR systems and compatibility with the International League Against Epilepsy classification of seizure types.ResultsCommon data elements were drafted in August 2017 and finalized in January 2020. Prioritized outcomes included seizure control, seizure freedom, American Academy of Neurology quality measures, presence of common comorbidities, and quality of life. The CDEs were piloted at 224 visits at 10 centers. The final CDEs included 36 questions in nine sections (number of questions): diagnosis (1), seizure frequency (9), quality of life (2), epilepsy history (6), etiology (8), comorbidities (2), treatment (2), process measures (5), and longitudinal history notes (1). Seizures are categorized as generalized tonic-clonic (regardless of onset), motor, nonmotor, and epileptic spasms. Focality is collected as epilepsy type rather than seizure type. Seizure frequency is measured in nine levels (all used during piloting). The CDEs were implemented in three vendor systems. Early clinical adoption included 1294 encounters at one center.SignificanceWe created, piloted, refined, finalized, and implemented a novel set of clinical CDEs for pediatric epilepsy.

Project description:BackgroundThe anonymization of Common Data Model (CDM)-converted EHR data is essential to ensure the data privacy in the use of harmonized health care data. However, applying data anonymization techniques can significantly affect many properties of the resulting data sets and thus biases research results. Few studies have reviewed these applications with a reflection of approaches to manage data utility and quality concerns in the context of CDM-formatted health care data.ObjectiveOur intended scoping review aims to identify and describe (1) how formal anonymization methods are carried out with CDM-converted health care data, (2) how data quality and utility concerns are considered, and (3) how the various CDMs differ in terms of their suitability for recording anonymized data.MethodsThe planned scoping review is based on the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. By using this, only articles published in English will be included. The retrieval of literature items should be based on a literature search string combining keywords related to data anonymization, CDM standards, and data quality assessment. The proposed literature search query should be validated by a librarian, accompanied by manual searches to include further informal sources. Eligible articles will first undergo a deduplication step, followed by the screening of titles. Second, a full-text reading will allow the 2 reviewers involved to reach the final decision about article selection, while a domain expert will support the resolution of citation selection conflicts. Additionally, key information will be extracted, categorized, summarized, and analyzed by using a proposed template into an iterative process. Tabular and graphical analyses should be addressed in alignment with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. We also performed some tentative searches on Web of Science for estimating the feasibility of reaching eligible articles.ResultsTentative searches on Web of Science resulted in 507 nonduplicated matches, suggesting the availability of (potential) relevant articles. Further analysis and selection steps will allow us to derive a final literature set. Furthermore, the completion of this scoping review study is expected by the end of the fourth quarter of 2023.ConclusionsOutlining the approaches of applying formal anonymization methods on CDM-formatted health care data while taking into account data quality and utility concerns should provide useful insights to understand the existing approaches and future research direction based on identified gaps. This protocol describes a schedule to perform a scoping review, which should support the conduction of follow-up investigations.International registered report identifier (irrid)PRR1-10.2196/46471.

Project description:ObjectivesRecent sepsis studies have defined patients as "infected" using a combination of culture and antibiotic orders rather than billing data. However, the accuracy of these definitions is unclear. We aimed to compare the accuracy of different established criteria for identifying infected patients using detailed chart review.DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingSix hospitals from three health systems in Illinois.PatientsAdult admissions with blood culture or antibiotic orders, or Angus International Classification of Diseases infection codes and death were eligible for study inclusion as potentially infected patients. Nine-hundred to 1,000 of these admissions were randomly selected from each health system for chart review, and a proportional number of patients who did not meet chart review eligibility criteria were also included and deemed not infected.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsThe accuracy of published billing code criteria by Angus et al and electronic health record criteria by Rhee et al and Seymour et al (Sepsis-3) was determined using the manual chart review results as the gold standard. A total of 5,215 patients were included, with 2,874 encounters analyzed via chart review and a proportional 2,341 added who did not meet chart review eligibility criteria. In the study cohort, 27.5% of admissions had at least one infection. This was most similar to the percentage of admissions with blood culture orders (26.8%), Angus infection criteria (28.7%), and the Sepsis-3 criteria (30.4%). Sepsis-3 criteria was the most sensitive (81%), followed by Angus (77%) and Rhee (52%), while Rhee (97%) and Angus (90%) were more specific than the Sepsis-3 criteria (89%). Results were similar for patients with organ dysfunction during their admission.ConclusionsPublished criteria have a wide range of accuracy for identifying infected patients, with the Sepsis-3 criteria being the most sensitive and Rhee criteria being the most specific. These findings have important implications for studies investigating the burden of sepsis on a local and national level.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The secondary use of electronic health records (EHRs) promises to facilitate medical research. We reviewed general data requirements in observational studies and analyzed the feasibility of conducting observational studies with structured EHR data, in particular diagnosis and procedure codes. METHODS:After reviewing published observational studies from the University Hospital of Erlangen for general data requirements, we identified three different study populations for the feasibility analysis with eligibility criteria from three exemplary observational studies. For each study population, we evaluated the availability of relevant patient characteristics in our EHR, including outcome and exposure variables. To assess data quality, we computed distributions of relevant patient characteristics from the available structured EHR data and compared them to those of the original studies. We implemented computed phenotypes for patient characteristics where necessary. In random samples, we evaluated how well structured patient characteristics agreed with a gold standard from manually interpreted free texts. We categorized our findings using the four data quality dimensions "completeness", "correctness", "currency" and "granularity". RESULTS:Reviewing general data requirements, we found that some investigators supplement routine data with questionnaires, interviews and follow-up examinations. We included 847 subjects in the feasibility analysis (Study 1 n?=?411, Study 2 n?=?423, Study 3 n?=?13). All eligibility criteria from two studies were available in structured data, while one study required computed phenotypes in eligibility criteria. In one study, we found that all necessary patient characteristics were documented at least once in either structured or unstructured data. In another study, all exposure and outcome variables were available in structured data, while in the other one unstructured data had to be consulted. The comparison of patient characteristics distributions, as computed from structured data, with those from the original study yielded similar distributions as well as indications of underreporting. We observed violations in all four data quality dimensions. CONCLUSIONS:While we found relevant patient characteristics available in structured EHR data, data quality problems may entail that it remains a case-by-case decision whether diagnosis and procedure codes are sufficient to underpin observational studies. Free-text data or subsequently supplementary study data may be important to complement a comprehensive patient history.

Dataset Information

A European inventory of common electronic health record data elements for clinical trial feasibility.

Publications

A European inventory of common electronic health record data elements for clinical trial feasibility.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets