Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Detecting and correcting the bias of unmeasured factors using perturbation analysis: a data-mining approach.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The randomized controlled study is the gold-standard research method in biomedicine. In contrast, the validity of a (nonrandomized) observational study is often questioned because of unknown/unmeasured factors, which may have confounding and/or effect-modifying potential.

Methods

In this paper, the author proposes a perturbation test to detect the bias of unmeasured factors and a perturbation adjustment to correct for such bias. The proposed method circumvents the problem of measuring unknowns by collecting the perturbations of unmeasured factors instead. Specifically, a perturbation is a variable that is readily available (or can be measured easily) and is potentially associated, though perhaps only very weakly, with unmeasured factors. The author conducted extensive computer simulations to provide a proof of concept.

Results

Computer simulations show that, as the number of perturbation variables increases from data mining, the power of the perturbation test increased progressively, up to nearly 100%. In addition, after the perturbation adjustment, the bias decreased progressively, down to nearly 0%.

Conclusions

The data-mining perturbation analysis described here is recommended for use in detecting and correcting the bias of unmeasured factors in observational studies.

SUBMITTER: Lee WC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3925987 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6659360 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4035575 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7824570 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4160374 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8092017 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3634064 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10785315 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5240672 | biostudies-literature
2018-05-31 | GSE100100 | GEO
| S-EPMC10199025 | biostudies-literature