Dataset Information

In and out: an analysis of epibiotic vs periplasmic bacterial predators.

ABSTRACT: Bdellovibrio and like organisms (BALO) are obligate predators of Gram-negative bacteria, belonging to the ?- and ?-proteobacteria. BALO prey using either a periplasmic or an epibiotic predatory strategy, but the genetic background underlying these phenotypes is not known. Here we compare the epibiotic Bdellovibrio exovorus and Micavibrio aeruginosavorus to the periplasmic B. bacteriovorus and Bacteriovorax marinus. Electron microscopy showed that M. aeruginosavorus, but not B. exovorus, can attach to prey cells in a non-polar manner through its longitudinal side. Both these predators were resistant to a surprisingly high number of antibiotic compounds, possibly via 26 and 19 antibiotic-resistance genes, respectively, most of them encoding efflux pumps. Comparative genomic analysis of all the BALOs revealed that epibiotic predators have a much smaller genome (ca. 2.5?Mbp) than the periplasmic predators (ca. 3.5?Mbp). Additionally, periplasmic predators have, on average, 888 more proteins, at least 60% more peptidases, and one more rRNA operon. Fifteen and 219 protein families were specific to the epibiotic and the periplasmic predators, respectively, the latter clearly forming the core of the periplasmic 'predatome', which is upregulated during the growth phase. Metabolic deficiencies of epibiotic genomes include the synthesis of inosine, riboflavin, vitamin B6 and the siderophore aerobactin. The phylogeny of the epibiotic predators suggests that they evolved by convergent evolution, with M. aeruginosavorus originating from a non-predatory ancestor while B. exovorus evolved from periplasmic predators by gene loss.

SUBMITTER: Pasternak Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3930308 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

In and out: an analysis of epibiotic vs periplasmic bacterial predators.

Pasternak Z Z Njagi M M Shani Y Y Chanyi R R Rotem O O Lurie-Weinberger M N MN Koval S S Pietrokovski S S Gophna U U Jurkevitch E E

The ISME journal 20131003 3

Bdellovibrio and like organisms (BALO) are obligate predators of Gram-negative bacteria, belonging to the α- and δ-proteobacteria. BALO prey using either a periplasmic or an epibiotic predatory strategy, but the genetic background underlying these phenotypes is not known. Here we compare the epibiotic Bdellovibrio exovorus and Micavibrio aeruginosavorus to the periplasmic B. bacteriovorus and Bacteriovorax marinus. Electron microscopy showed that M. aeruginosavorus, but not B. exovorus, can atta ...[more]

PMID: 24088628

Similar Datasets

Project description:Coral microbiomes are known to play important roles in organismal health, response to environmental stress, and resistance to disease. The coral microbiome contains diverse assemblages of resident bacteria, ranging from defensive and metabolic symbionts to opportunistic bacteria that may turn harmful in compromised hosts. However, little is known about how these bacterial interactions influence the mechanism and controls of overall structure, stability, and function of the microbiome. We sought to test how coral microbiome dynamics were affected by interactions between two bacteria: Vibrio coralliilyticus, a known temperature-dependent pathogen of some corals, and Halobacteriovorax, a unique bacterial predator of Vibrio and other gram-negative bacteria. We challenged reef-building coral with V. coralliilyticus in the presence or absence of Halobacteriovorax predators, and monitored microbial community dynamics with 16S rRNA gene profiling time-series. Vibrio coralliilyticus inoculation increased the mean relative abundance of Vibrios by greater than 35% from the 4 to 8 hour time point, but not in the 24 & 32 hour time points. However, strong secondary effects of the Vibrio challenge were also observed for the rest of the microbiome such as increased richness (observed species), and reduced stability (increased beta-diversity). Moreover, after the transient increase in Vibrios, two lineages of bacteria (Rhodobacterales and Cytophagales) increased in coral tissues, suggesting that V. coralliilyticus challenge opens niche space for these known opportunists. Rhodobacterales increased from 6.99% (±0.05 SEM) to a maximum mean relative abundance of 48.75% (±0.14 SEM) in the final time point and Cytophagales from <0.001% to 3.656%. Halobacteriovorax predators are commonly present at low-abundance on coral surfaces. Based on the keystone role of predators in many ecosystems, we hypothesized that Halobacteriovorax predators might help protect corals by consuming foreign or "alien" gram negative bacteria. Halobacteriovorax inoculation also altered the microbiome but to a lesser degree than V. coralliilyticus, and Halobacteriovorax were never detected after inoculation. Simultaneous challenge with both V. coralliilyticus and predatory Halobacteriovorax eliminated the increase in V. coralliilyticus, ameliorated changes to the rest of the coral microbiome, and prevented the secondary blooms of opportunistic Rhodobacterales and Cytophagales seen in the V. coralliilyticus challenge. These data suggest that, under certain circumstances, host-associated bacterial predators may mitigate the ability of other bacteria to destabilize the microbiome.

Project description:Bdellovibrio and like organisms are abundant environmental parasitoids of prokaryotes that show diverse predation strategies. The vast majority of studied Bdellovibrio bacteria and like organisms deploy intraperiplasmic replication inside the prey cell, while few isolates with smaller genomes consume their prey from the outside in an epibiotic manner. The novel parasitoid "Candidatus Bdellovibrio qaytius" was isolated from a eutrophic freshwater pond in British Columbia, where it was a continual part of the microbial community. "Ca Bdellovibrio qaytius" was found to preferentially prey on the betaproteobacterium Paraburkholderia fungorum without entering the periplasm. Despite its epibiotic replication strategy, "Ca Bdellovibrio" encodes a large genomic complement more similar to that of complex periplasmic predators. Functional genomic annotation further revealed several biosynthesis pathways not previously found in epibiotic predators, indicating that "Ca Bdellovibrio" represents an intermediate phenotype and at the same time narrowing down the genomic complement specific to epibiotic predators. In phylogenetic analysis, "Ca Bdellovibrio qaytius" occupies a widely distributed, but poorly characterized, basal cluster within the genus Bdellovibrio This suggests that epibiotic predation might be a common predation type in nature and that epibiotic predation could be the ancestral predation type in the genus.IMPORTANCEBdellovibrio and like organisms are bacteria that prey on other bacteria and are widespread in the environment. Most of the known Bdellovibrio species enter the space between the inner and outer prey membrane, where they consume their prey cells. However, one Bdellovibrio species has been described that consumes its prey from the outside. Here, we describe "Ca Bdellovibrio qaytius," a novel member of the genus Bdellovibrio that also remains outside the prey cell throughout its replication cycle. Unexpectedly, the genome of "Ca Bdellovibrio" is much more similar to the genomes of intracellular predators than to the species with a similar life cycle. Since "Ca Bdellovibrio" is also a basal representative of this genus, we hypothesize that extracellular predation could be the ancestral predation strategy.

Project description:Predation structures food webs, influences energy flow, and alters rates and pathways of nutrient cycling through ecosystems, effects that are well documented for macroscopic predators. In the microbial world, predatory bacteria are common, yet little is known about their rates of growth and roles in energy flows through microbial food webs, in part because these are difficult to quantify. Here, we show that growth and carbon uptake were higher in predatory bacteria compared to nonpredatory bacteria, a finding across 15 sites, synthesizing 82 experiments and over 100,000 taxon-specific measurements of element flow into newly synthesized bacterial DNA. Obligate predatory bacteria grew 36% faster and assimilated carbon at rates 211% higher than nonpredatory bacteria. These differences were less pronounced for facultative predators (6% higher growth rates, 17% higher carbon assimilation rates), though high growth and carbon assimilation rates were observed for some facultative predators, such as members of the genera Lysobacter and Cytophaga, both capable of gliding motility and wolf-pack hunting behavior. Added carbon substrates disproportionately stimulated growth of obligate predators, with responses 63% higher than those of nonpredators for the Bdellovibrionales and 81% higher for the Vampirovibrionales, whereas responses of facultative predators to substrate addition were no different from those of nonpredators. This finding supports the ecological theory that higher productivity increases predator control of lower trophic levels. These findings also indicate that the functional significance of bacterial predators increases with energy flow and that predatory bacteria influence element flow through microbial food webs.IMPORTANCE The word "predator" may conjure images of leopards killing and eating impala on the African savannah or of great white sharks attacking elephant seals off the coast of California. But microorganisms are also predators, including bacteria that kill and eat other bacteria. While predatory bacteria have been found in many environments, it has been challenging to document their importance in nature. This study quantified the growth of predatory and nonpredatory bacteria in soils (and one stream) by tracking isotopically labeled substrates into newly synthesized DNA. Predatory bacteria were more active than nonpredators, and obligate predators, such as Bdellovibrionales and Vampirovibrionales, increased in growth rate in response to added substrates at the base of the food chain, strong evidence of trophic control. This work provides quantitative measures of predator activity and suggests that predatory bacteria-along with protists, nematodes, and phages-are active and important in microbial food webs.

Dataset Information

In and out: an analysis of epibiotic vs periplasmic bacterial predators.

Publications

In and out: an analysis of epibiotic vs periplasmic bacterial predators.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets