Dataset Information

Internalization of the chemokine receptor CCR4 can be evoked by orthosteric and allosteric receptor antagonists.

ABSTRACT: The chemokine receptor CCR4 has at least two natural agonist ligands, MDC (CCL22) and TARC (CCL17) which bind to the same orthosteric site with a similar affinity. Both ligands are known to evoke chemotaxis of CCR4-bearing T cells and also elicit CCR4 receptor internalization. A series of small molecule allosteric antagonists have been described which displace the agonist ligand, and inhibit chemotaxis. The aim of this study was to determine which cellular coupling pathways are involved in internalization, and if antagonists binding to the CCR4 receptor could themselves evoke receptor internalization. CCL22 binding coupled CCR4 efficiently to ?-arrestin and stimulated GTP?S binding however CCL17 did not couple to ?-arrestin and only partially stimulated GTP?S binding. CCL22 potently induced internalization of almost all cell surface CCR4, while CCL17 showed only weak effects. We describe four small molecule antagonists that were demonstrated to bind to two distinct allosteric sites on the CCR4 receptor, and while both classes inhibited agonist ligand binding and chemotaxis, one of the allosteric sites also evoked receptor internalization. Furthermore, we also characterize an N-terminally truncated version of CCL22 which acts as a competitive antagonist at the orthosteric site, and surprisingly also evokes receptor internalization without demonstrating any agonist activity. Collectively this study demonstrates that orthosteric and allosteric antagonists of the CCR4 receptor are capable of evoking receptor internalization, providing a novel strategy for drug discovery against this class of target.

SUBMITTER: Ajram L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3989064 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Internalization of the chemokine receptor CCR4 can be evoked by orthosteric and allosteric receptor antagonists.

Ajram Laura L Begg Malcolm M Slack Robert R Cryan Jenni J Hall David D Hodgson Simon S Ford Alison A Barnes Ashley A Swieboda Dawid D Mousnier Aurelie A Solari Roberto R

European journal of pharmacology 20140215

The chemokine receptor CCR4 has at least two natural agonist ligands, MDC (CCL22) and TARC (CCL17) which bind to the same orthosteric site with a similar affinity. Both ligands are known to evoke chemotaxis of CCR4-bearing T cells and also elicit CCR4 receptor internalization. A series of small molecule allosteric antagonists have been described which displace the agonist ligand, and inhibit chemotaxis. The aim of this study was to determine which cellular coupling pathways are involved in inter ...[more]

PMID: 24534492

Similar Datasets

Project description:The urokinase receptor (uPAR) is a GPI-anchored cell surface receptor that is at the center of an intricate network of protein-protein interactions. Its immediate binding partners are the serine proteinase urokinase (uPA), and vitronectin (VTN), a component of the extracellular matrix. uPA and VTN bind at distinct sites on uPAR to promote extracellular matrix degradation and integrin signaling, respectively. Here, we report the discovery of a new class of pyrrolone small-molecule inhibitors of the tight ∼1 nM uPAR·uPA protein-protein interaction. These compounds were designed to bind to the uPA pocket on uPAR. The highest affinity compound, namely 7, displaced a fluorescently labeled α-helical peptide (AE147-FAM) with an inhibition constant Ki of 0.7 μM and inhibited the tight uPAR·uPAATF interaction with an IC50 of 18 μM. Biophysical studies with surface plasmon resonance showed that VTN binding is highly dependent on uPA. This cooperative binding was confirmed as 7, which binds at the uPAR·uPA interface, also inhibited the distal VTN·uPAR interaction. In cell culture, 7 blocked the uPAR·uPA interaction in uPAR-expressing human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cells and impaired cell adhesion to VTN, a process that is mediated by integrins. As a result, 7 inhibited integrin signaling in MDA-MB-231 cancer cells as evidenced by a decrease in focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation and Rac1 GTPase activation. Consistent with these results, 7 blocked breast MDA-MB-231 cancer cell invasion with IC50 values similar to those observed in ELISA and surface plasmon resonance competition studies. Explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations show that the cooperativity between uPA and VTN is attributed to stabilization of uPAR motion by uPA. In addition, free energy calculations revealed that uPA stabilizes the VTNSMB·uPAR interaction through more favorable electrostatics and entropy. Disruption of the uPAR·VTNSMB interaction by 7 is consistent with the cooperative binding to uPAR by uPA and VTN. Interestingly, the VTNSMB·uPAR interaction was less favorable in the VTNSMB·uPAR·7 complex suggesting potential cooperativity between 7 and VTN. Compound 7 provides an excellent starting point for the development of more potent derivatives to explore uPAR biology.

Project description:Allosteric modulators (AMs) are considered as a perpetual hotspot in research for their higher selectivity and various effects on orthosteric ligands (OL). They are classified in terms of their functionalities as positive, negative, or silent allosteric modulators (PAM, NAM, or SAM, respectively). In the present work, 11 pairs of three-dimensional (3D) structures of receptor-orthosteric ligand and receptor-orthosteric ligand-allosteric modulator complexes have been collected for the studies, including three different systems: GPCR, enzyme, and ion channel. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are applied to quantify the dynamic interactions in both the orthosteric and allosteric binding pockets and the structural fluctuation of the involved proteins. Our results showed that MD simulations of moderately large molecules or peptides undergo insignificant changes compared to crystal structure results. Furthermore, we also studied the conformational changes of receptors that bound with PAM and NAM, as well as the different allosteric binding sites in a receptor. There should be no preference for the position of the allosteric binding pocket after comparing the allosteric binding pockets of these three systems. Finally, we aligned four distinct β2 adrenoceptor structures and three N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) structures to investigate conformational changes. In the β2 adrenoceptor systems, the aligned results revealed that transmembrane (TM) helices 1, 5, and 6 gradually increased outward movement from an enhanced inactive state to an improved active state. TM6 endured the most significant conformational changes (around 11 Å). For NMDAR, the bottom section of NMDAR's ligand-binding domain (LBD) experienced an upward and outward shift during the gradually activating process. In conclusion, our research provides insight into receptor-orthosteric ligand-allosteric modulator studies and the design and development of allosteric modulator drugs using MD simulation.

Project description:Background and objectiveMuscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are 7-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptors that regulate a variety of physiological processes and represent potentially important targets for therapeutic intervention. mAChRs can be stimulated by full and partial orthosteric and allosteric agonists, however the relative abilities of such ligands to induce conformational changes in the receptor remain unclear. To gain further insight into the actions of mAChR agonists, we have developed a fluorescently tagged M(1) mAChR that reports ligand-induced conformational changes in real-time by changes in Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET).MethodsVariants of CFP and YFP were inserted into the third intracellular loop and at the end of the C-terminus of the mouse M(1) mAChR, respectively. The optimized FRET receptor construct (M(1)-cam5) was expressed stably in HEK293 cells.ResultsThe variant CFP/YFP-receptor chimera expressed predominantly at the plasma membrane of HEK293 cells and displayed ligand-binding affinities comparable with those of the wild-type receptor. It also retained an ability to interact with G?(q/11) proteins and to stimulate phosphoinositide turnover, ERK1/2 phosphorylation and undergo agonist-dependent internalization. Addition of the full agonist methacholine caused a reversible decrease in M(1) FRET (F(EYFP)/F(ECFP)) that was prevented by atropine pre-addition and showed concentration-dependent amplitude and kinetics. Partial orthosteric agonists, arecoline and pilocarpine, as well as allosteric agonists, AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1, also caused atropine-sensitive decreases in the FRET signal, which were smaller in amplitude and significantly slower in onset compared to those evoked by methacholine.ConclusionThe M(1) FRET-based receptor chimera reports that allosteric and orthosteric agonists induce similar conformational changes in the third intracellular loop and/or C-terminus, and should prove to be a valuable molecular reagent for pharmacological and structural investigations of M(1) mAChR activation.

Dataset Information

Internalization of the chemokine receptor CCR4 can be evoked by orthosteric and allosteric receptor antagonists.

Publications

Internalization of the chemokine receptor CCR4 can be evoked by orthosteric and allosteric receptor antagonists.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets