Dataset Information

Comparison of two preclinical myocardial infarct models: coronary coil deployment versus surgical ligation.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances, myocardial infarction (MI) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Pre-clinical animal models that closely mimic human MI are pivotal for a quick translation of research and swine have similarities in anatomy and physiology. Here, we compared coronary surgical ligation versus coil embolization MI models in swine. METHODS: Fifteen animals were randomly distributed to undergo surgical ligation (n=7) or coil embolization (n=8). We evaluated infarct size, scar fibrosis, inflammation, myocardial vascularization, and cardiac function by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: Thirty-five days after MI, there were no differences between the models in infarct size (P=0.53), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (P=0.19), LV end systolic volume (P=0.22), LV end diastolic volume (P=0.84), and cardiac output (P=0.89). Histologically, cardiac scars did not differ and the collagen content, collagen type I (I), collagen type III (III), and the I/III ratio were similar in both groups. Inflammation was assessed using specific anti-CD3 and anti-CD25 antibodies. There was similar activation of inflammation throughout the heart after coil embolization (P=0.78); while, there were more activated lymphocytes in the infarcted myocardium in the surgical occlusion model (P=0.02). Less myocardial vascularization in the infarction areas compared with the border and remote zones only in coil embolization animals was observed (P=0.004 and P=0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that surgical occlusion and coil embolization MI models generate similar infarct size, cardiac function impairment, and myocardial fibrosis; although, inflammation and myocardial vascularization levels were closer to those found in humans when coil embolization was performed.

SUBMITTER: Galvez-Monton C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4047266 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of two preclinical myocardial infarct models: coronary coil deployment versus surgical ligation.

Gálvez-Montón Carolina C Prat-Vidal Cristina C Díaz-Güemes Idoia I Crisóstomo Verónica V Soler-Botija Carolina C Roura Santiago S Llucià-Valldeperas Aida A Perea-Gil Isaac I Sánchez-Margallo Francisco M FM Bayes-Genis Antoni A

Journal of translational medicine 20140521

<h4>Background</h4>Despite recent advances, myocardial infarction (MI) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Pre-clinical animal models that closely mimic human MI are pivotal for a quick translation of research and swine have similarities in anatomy and physiology. Here, we compared coronary surgical ligation versus coil embolization MI models in swine.<h4>Methods</h4>Fifteen animals were randomly distributed to undergo surgical ligation (n=7) or coil embolization (n=8). We evaluated in ...[more]

PMID: 24885652

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aims/hypothesisLarge cardiovascular outcome trials demonstrated that the cardioprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors might reach beyond glucose-lowering action. In this meta-analysis, we sought to evaluate the potential infarct size-modulating effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in preclinical studies.MethodsIn this preregistered meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42020189124), we included placebo-controlled, interventional studies of small and large animal models of myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury, testing the effect of SGLT2 inhibitor treatment on myocardial infarct size (percentage of area at risk or total area). Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and pooled using random-effects method. We evaluated heterogeneity by computing Τ2 and I2 values. Meta-regression was performed to explore prespecified subgroup differences according to experimental protocols and their contribution to heterogeneity was assessed (pseudo-R2 values).ResultsWe identified ten eligible publications, reporting 16 independent controlled comparisons on a total of 224 animals. Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor significantly reduced myocardial infarct size compared with placebo (SMD = -1.30 [95% CI -1.79, -0.81], p < 0.00001), referring to a 33% [95% CI 20%, 47%] difference. Heterogeneity was moderate (Τ2 = 0.58, I2 = 60%). SGLT2 inhibitors were only effective when administered to the intact organ system, but not to isolated hearts (p interaction <0.001, adjusted pseudo-R2 = 47%). While acute administration significantly reduced infarct size, chronic treatment was superior (p interaction <0.001, adjusted pseudo-R2 = 85%). The medications significantly reduced infarct size in both diabetic and non-diabetic animals, favouring the former (p interaction = 0.030, adjusted pseudo-R2 = 12%). Treatment was equally effective in rats and mice, as well as in a porcine model. Individual study quality scores were not related to effect estimates (p = 0.33). The overall effect estimate remained large even after adjusting for severe forms of publication bias.Conclusions/interpretationThe glucose-lowering SGLT2 inhibitors reduce myocardial infarct size in animal models independent of diabetes. Future in vivo studies should focus on clinical translation by exploring whether SGLT2 inhibitors limit infarct size in animals with relevant comorbidities, on top of loading doses of antiplatelet agents. Mechanistic studies should elucidate the potential relationship between the infarct size-lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors and the intact organ system.

Project description:Preinfarction angina may act as a clinical surrogate of ischemic preconditioning that may reduce infarct size and improve mortality in the setting of thrombolytic therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, the benefits of preinfarction angina in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting is inconclusive because of the greater achievement of infarct artery patency and speed of reperfusion.To identify a homogeneous population, we performed a retrospective analysis of 1031 patients admitted with a first ST-elevation myocardial infarction with ischemic times between 1 and 6 hours who received primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We identified 245 patients who had occluded arteries on presentation, of which 79 patients had documented preinfarction angina defined as chest pain within 24 hours of infarction. Infarct size was measured as the peak creatine kinase level, a metric supported in a subgroup by late enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with preinfarction angina (n=79) had a 50% reduction in infarct size compared with those patients without preinfarction angina (n=166) by both peak creatine kinase (1094±75 IU/L versus 2270±102 IU/L; P<0.0001) and creatine kinase area under curve (18 420±18 941 versus 36 810±21 741 IU/h per liter; P<0.0001) despite having identical ischemic times (185±8 minutes versus 181±5 minutes; P=0.67) and angiographic area at risk (24.1±1.2% versus 25.3±0.9%; P=0.43). There was an absolute 4% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction before discharge in those patients with preinfarction angina (P<0.02).The occurrence of preinfarction angina is associated with significant myocardial protection in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting during ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Because preinfarction angina is relatively common, it is important that these patients be identified in clinical trials investigating therapies designed to reduce reperfusion injury and infarct size.

Dataset Information

Comparison of two preclinical myocardial infarct models: coronary coil deployment versus surgical ligation.

Publications

Comparison of two preclinical myocardial infarct models: coronary coil deployment versus surgical ligation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets