Dataset Information

Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study.

ABSTRACT: The anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of ischaemia referenced by fractional flow reserve (FFR) from non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have not been evaluated contemporarily in a large-scale study. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of CCTA compared with ICA and IVUS in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.CCTA, ICA, IVUS, and FFR were performed in 181 coronary lesions with intermediate severity. Minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and per cent diameter stenosis (%DS) were determined by CCTA and ICA, whereas minimal lumen area (MLA) was determined by CCTA and IVUS. Inducible ischaemia was defined by FFR ? 0.80. Diagnostic performances from non-invasive and invasive methods were compared. FFR ? 0.80 was observed in 49 (27.1%) lesions. CCTA MLD was smaller than ICA MLD (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4 mm, P < 0.001), CCTA %DS was higher than ICA %DS (54.0 ± 14.0 vs. 50.3 ± 12.8%, P < 0.001), and CCTA MLA was smaller than IVUS MLA (2.2 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2 mm(2), P < 0.001). This trend was consistent irrespective of lesion location, lesion severity, and plaque characteristics. For the determination of ischaemia, diagnostic performance of CCTA %DS was lower than ICA %DS [area under the curve (AUC) 0.657 vs. 0.765, P = 0.04], and that of CCTA MLA was lower than IVUS MLA (AUC 0.712 vs. 0.801, P = 0.03).Anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of ischaemia-producing coronary stenosis differ by non-invasive and invasive methods. Compared with invasive methods, CCTA presents overestimation in assessing lesion severity and lower diagnostic performance in assessing ischaemia.

SUBMITTER: Doh JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4110885 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography in comparison with invasive coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis: results from the prospective multicentre FIGURE-OUT (Functional Imaging criteria for GUiding REview of invasive coronary angiOgraphy, intravascular Ultrasound, and coronary computed Tomographic angiography) study.

Doh Joon-Hyung JH Koo Bon-Kwon BK Nam Chang-Wook CW Kim Ji-Hyun JH Min James K JK Nakazato Ryo R Silalahi Todung T Prawira Hardjo H Choi Hyunmin H Lee Sung Yun SY Namgung June J Kwon Sung Uk SU Kwak Jae-Jin JJ Lee Won Ro WR

European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging 20140209 8

<h4>Aims</h4>The anatomical criteria for the diagnosis of ischaemia referenced by fractional flow reserve (FFR) from non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have not been evaluated contemporarily in a large-scale study. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of CCTA compared with ICA and IVUS in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis.<h4>Methods and results</h4>CCTA, ICA, IVUS, ...[more]

PMID: 24513881

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVES:We sought to evaluate the accuracy of standardized total plaque volume (TPV) measurement and low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP) assessment from coronary CT angiography (CTA) in comparison with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS:We analyzed 118 plaques without extensive calcifications from 77 consecutive patients who underwent CTA prior to IVUS. CTA TPV was measured with semi-automated software comparing both scan-specific (automatically derived from scan) and fixed attenuation thresholds. From CTA, %LDNCP was calculated voxels below multiple LDNCP thresholds (30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 Hounsfield units [HU]) within the plaque. On IVUS, the lipid-rich component was identified by echo attenuation, and its size was measured using attenuation score (summed score ? analysis length) based on attenuation arc (1?=?<?90°; 2?=?90-180°; 3?=?180-270°; 4?=?270-360°) every 1 mm. RESULTS:TPV was highly correlated between CTA using scan-specific thresholds and IVUS (r?=?0.943, p?<?0.001), with no significant difference (2.6 mm3, p?=?0.270). These relationships persisted for calcification patterns (maximal IVUS calcium arc of 0°, <?90°, or ??90°). The fixed thresholds underestimated TPV (-?22.0 mm3, p?<?0.001) and had an inferior correlation with IVUS (p?<?0.001) compared with scan-specific thresholds. A 45-HU cutoff yielded the best diagnostic performance for identification of lipid-rich component, with an area under the curve of 0.878 vs. 0.840 for <?30 HU (p?=?0.023), and corresponding %LDNCP resulted in the strongest correlation with the lipid-rich component size (r?=?0.691, p?<?0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Standardized noninvasive plaque quantification from CTA using scan-specific thresholds correlates highly with IVUS. Use of a <?45-HU threshold for LDNCP quantification improves lipid-rich plaque assessment from CTA. KEY POINTS:• Standardized scan-specific threshold-based plaque quantification from coronary CT angiography provides an accurate total plaque volume measurement compared with intravascular ultrasound. • Attenuation histogram-based low-density non-calcified plaque quantification can improve lipid-rich plaque assessment from coronary CT angiography.

Project description:As a non-invasive, side effect-free and cost-effective method, ultrasonography represents the method of choice for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Four different criteria in total, including two direct criteria in peak systolic velocity (PSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR) and two indirect criteria in resistance index (RI) and acceleration time (AT) for the measurement of relevant renal artery stenosis are described, each demonstrating highly variable accuracy in studies. Furthermore, there is controversy over the degree beyond which stenosis becomes therapeutically relevant and which ultrasound PSV is diagnostically relevant in terms of stenosis grading.This article gives a critical review based on a selective literature search on measurement methodology and the validity of ultrasound in renal artery stenosis. A critical evaluation of methods and a presentation of measurement principles to establish the most precise measurement method possible compared with the gold standard angiography, as well as an evaluation of the importance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).The PSV provides high sensitivity and specificity as a direct measurement method in stenosis detection and grading. Most studies found sensitivities and specificities of 85-90?% for >?50?% stenosis at a PSV >?180-200 cm/s in ROC curve analysis. Other methods, such as the ratio of the PSV in the aorta to the PSV in the renal artery (RAR) or indirect criteria, such as side to side differences in RI (dRI) or AT can be additionally used to improve accuracy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound improves accuracy by means of echo contrast enhancement. Although in the past only high-grade stenosis was considered relevant for treatment, a drop in pressure of >?20 mmHg in >?50?% stenosis (PSV 180 cm/s) is classified as relevant for increased renin secretion. Stenosis in fibromuscular dysplasia can be reliably graded according to the continuity equation. Although the available studies on the grading of in-stent restenosis are the subject of controversy, there is a tendency to assume higher cut-off values for PSV and RAR. Whilst MRA and CTA demonstrate an accuracy of >?90?%, this is at the cost of possible side effects for patients, particularly in the case of pre-existing renal parenchymal damage.This article includes two additional video sequences on visualizing renal artery stenosis. This supplemental material can be found under: dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00772-015-0060-3.

Dataset Information

Publications

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure