Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Serological diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis: high rate of inter-laboratorial variability among medical mycology reference centers.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Serological tests have long been established as rapid, simple and inexpensive tools for the diagnosis and follow-up of PCM. However, different protocols and antigen preparations are used and the few attempts to standardize the routine serological methods have not succeeded.

Methodology/principal findings

We compared the performance of six Brazilian reference centers for serological diagnosis of PCM. Each center provided 30 sera of PCM patients, with positive high, intermediate and low titers, which were defined as the "reference" titers. Each center then applied its own antigen preparation and serological routine test, either semiquantitative double immunodifusion or counterimmmunoelectrophoresis, in the 150 sera from the other five centers blindly as regard to the "reference" titers. Titers were transformed into scores: 0 (negative), 1 (healing titers), 2 (active disease, low titers) and 3 (active disease, high titers) according to each center's criteria. Major discordances were considered between scores indicating active disease and scores indicating negative or healing titers; such discordance when associated with proper clinical and other laboratorial data, may correspond to different approaches to the patient's treatment. Surprisingly, all centers exhibited a high rate of "major" discordances with a mean of 31 (20%) discordant scores. Alternatively, when the scores given by one center to their own sera were compared with the scores given to their sera by the remaining five other centers, a high rate of major discordances was also found, with a mean number of 14.8 sera in 30 presenting a discordance with at least one other center. The data also suggest that centers that used CIE and pool of isolates for antigen preparation performed better.

Conclusion

There are inconsistencies among the laboratories that are strong enough to result in conflicting information regarding the patients' treatment. Renewed efforts should be promoted to improve standardization of the serological diagnosis of PCM.

SUBMITTER: Vidal MS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4161321 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Serological diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis: high rate of inter-laboratorial variability among medical mycology reference centers.

Vidal Monica Scarpelli Martinelli MS   Del Negro Gilda Maria Barbaro GM   Vicentini Adriana Pardini AP   Svidzinski Teresinha Inez Estivalet TI   Mendes-Giannini Maria Jose MJ   Almeida Ana Marisa Fusco AM   Martinez Roberto R   de Camargo Zoilo Pires ZP   Taborda Carlos Pelleschi CP   Benard Gil G  

PLoS neglected tropical diseases 20140911 9


<h4>Background</h4>Serological tests have long been established as rapid, simple and inexpensive tools for the diagnosis and follow-up of PCM. However, different protocols and antigen preparations are used and the few attempts to standardize the routine serological methods have not succeeded.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>We compared the performance of six Brazilian reference centers for serological diagnosis of PCM. Each center provided 30 sera of PCM patients, with positive high, inter  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5599679 | biostudies-literature
2023-06-08 | GSE209816 | GEO
| S-EPMC5973567 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7347623 | biostudies-literature
2023-06-08 | GSE209815 | GEO
| S-EPMC3528970 | biostudies-other
2023-06-08 | GSE209810 | GEO
| S-EPMC9216442 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3977608 | biostudies-literature