Dataset Information

(18)F-alfatide II and (18)F-FDG dual-tracer dynamic PET for parametric, early prediction of tumor response to therapy.

ABSTRACT: A single dynamic PET acquisition using multiple tracers administered closely in time could provide valuable complementary information about a tumor's status under quasiconstant conditions. This study aimed to investigate the utility of dual-tracer dynamic PET imaging with (18)F-alfatide II ((18)F-AlF-NOTA-E[PEG4-c(RGDfk)]2) and (18)F-FDG for parametric monitoring of tumor responses to therapy.We administered doxorubicin to one group of athymic nude mice with U87MG tumors and paclitaxel protein-bound particles to another group of mice with MDA-MB-435 tumors. To monitor therapeutic responses, we performed dual-tracer dynamic imaging, in sessions that lasted 90 min, starting with injection via the tail vein catheters with (18)F-alfatide II, followed 40 min later by (18)F-FDG. To achieve signal separation of the 2 tracers, we fit a 3-compartment reversible model to the time-activity curve of (18)F-alfatide II for the 40 min before (18)F-FDG injection and then extrapolated to 90 min. The (18)F-FDG tumor time-activity curve was isolated from the 90-min dual-tracer tumor time-activity curve by subtracting the fitted (18)F-alfatide II tumor time-activity curve. With separated tumor time-activity curves, the (18)F-alfatide II binding potential (Bp = k3/k4) and volume of distribution (VD) and (18)F-FDG influx rate ((K1 × k3)/(k2 + k3)) based on the Patlak method were calculated to validate the signal recovery in a comparison with 60-min single-tracer imaging and to monitor therapeutic response.The transport and binding rate parameters K1-k3 of (18)F-alfatide II, calculated from the first 40 min of the dual-tracer dynamic scan, as well as Bp and VD correlated well with the parameters from the 60-min single-tracer scan (R(2) > 0.95). Compared with the results of single-tracer PET imaging, (18)F-FDG tumor uptake and influx were recovered well from dual-tracer imaging. On doxorubicin treatment, whereas no significant changes in static tracer uptake values of (18)F-alfatide II or (18)F-FDG were observed, both (18)F-alfatide II Bp and (18)F-FDG influx from kinetic analysis in tumors showed significant decreases. For therapy of MDA-MB-435 tumors with paclitaxel protein-bound particles, a significant decrease was observed only with (18)F-alfatide II Bp value from kinetic analysis but not (18)F-FDG influx.The parameters fitted with compartmental modeling from the dual-tracer dynamic imaging are consistent with those from single-tracer imaging, substantiating the feasibility of this methodology. Even though no significant differences in tumor size were found until 5 d after doxorubicin treatment started, at day 3 there were already substantial differences in (18)F-alfatide II Bp and (18)F-FDG influx rate. Dual-tracer imaging can measure (18)F-alfatide II Bp value and (18)F-FDG influx simultaneously to evaluate tumor angiogenesis and metabolism. Such changes are known to precede anatomic changes, and thus parametric imaging may offer the promise of early prediction of therapy response.

SUBMITTER: Guo J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4209961 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

(18)F-alfatide II and (18)F-FDG dual-tracer dynamic PET for parametric, early prediction of tumor response to therapy.

Guo Jinxia J Guo Ning N Lang Lixin L Kiesewetter Dale O DO Xie Qingguo Q Li Quanzheng Q Eden Henry S HS Niu Gang G Chen Xiaoyuan X

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 20131114 1

<h4>Unlabelled</h4>A single dynamic PET acquisition using multiple tracers administered closely in time could provide valuable complementary information about a tumor's status under quasiconstant conditions. This study aimed to investigate the utility of dual-tracer dynamic PET imaging with (18)F-alfatide II ((18)F-AlF-NOTA-E[PEG4-c(RGDfk)]2) and (18)F-FDG for parametric monitoring of tumor responses to therapy.<h4>Methods</h4>We administered doxorubicin to one group of athymic nude mice with U8 ...[more]

PMID: 24232871

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiac positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) can assess various cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we intra-individually compared right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) parameters obtained from dual-tracer PET/MRI scan.MethodsIn 22 patients with coronary heart disease (69 ± 9 years) dynamic [13N]NH3 (NH3) and [18F]FDG (FDG) PET scans were acquired. The first 2 minutes were used to calculate LV and RV first-pass ejection fraction (FPEF). Additionally, LV end-systolic (LVESV) and end-diastolic (LVEDV) volume and ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated from the early (EP) and late-myocardial phases (LP). MRI served as a reference.ResultsRVFPEF and LVFPEF from FDG and NH3 as well as RVEF and LVEF from MRI were (28 ± 11%, 32 ± 15%), (32 ± 11%, 41 ± 14%) and (42 ± 16%, 45 ± 19%), respectively. LVESV, LVEDV and LVEF from EP FDG and NH3 in 8 and 16 gates were [71 (15 to 213 mL), 98 (16 to 241 mL), 32 ± 17%] and [50 (17 to 206 mL), 93 (13 to 219 mL), 36 ± 17%] as well as [60 (19 to 360 mL), 109 (56 to 384 mL), 41 ± 22%] and [54 (16 to 371 mL), 116 (57 to 431 mL), 46 ± 24%], respectively. Moreover, LVESV, LVEDV and LVEF acquired from LP FDG and NH3 were (85 ± 63 mL, 138 ± 63 mL, 47 ± 19%) and (79 ± 56 mL, 137 ± 63 mL, 47 ± 20%), respectively. The LVESV, LVEDV from MRI were 93 ± 66 mL and 153 ± 71 mL, respectively. Significant correlations were observed for RVFPEF and LVFPEF between FDG and MRI (R = .51, P = .01; R = .64, P = .001), respectively. LVESV, LVEDV, and LVEF revealed moderate to strong correlations to MRI when they acquired from EP FDG and NH3 in 16 gates (all R > .7, P = .000). Similarly, all LV parameters from LP FDG and NH3 correlated good to strongly positive with MRI (all R > .7, and P < .001), except EDV from NH3 weakly correlated to EDV of MRI (R = .54, P < .05). Generally, Bland-Altman plots showed good agreements between PET and MRI.ConclusionsDeriving LV and RV functional values from various phases of dynamic NH3 and FDG PET is feasible. These results could open a new perspective for further clinical applications of the PET examinations.

Project description:18F-alfatide II has been proven to have excellent clinical translational potential. In this study, we investigated 18F-alfatide II for identifying breast cancer and compared the performances between 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG. Methods: Forty-four female patients with suspected primary breast cancer were recruited. PET/CT images using 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG were acquired within 7 d. Tracer uptake in breast lesions was evaluated by visual analysis, and semiquantitative analysis with SUVmax and SUVmean Results: Forty-two breast cancer lesions and 11 benign breast lesions were confirmed by histopathology in 44 patients. Both 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG had higher uptake in breast cancer lesions than in benign breast lesions (P < 0.05 for 18F-alfatide II, P < 0.05 for 18F-FDG). The area under the curve of 18F-alfatide II was slightly less than that of 18F-FDG. Both 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG had high sensitivity (88.1% vs. 90.5%), high positive predictive value (88.1% vs. 88.4%), moderate specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%), and moderate negative predictive value (54.5% vs. 60.0%) for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast lesions. By combining 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG, the sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly increased to 97.6% and 85.7%, respectively, with positive predictive value slightly increased to 89.1% and no change to the specificity (54.5%). The uptake of 18F-alfatide II (SUVmax: 3.77 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than that of 18F-FDG (SUVmax: 7.37 ± 4.48) in breast cancer lesions (P < 0.05). 18F-alfatide II uptake in triple-negative subtype was significantly lower than that in luminal A and luminal B subtypes. By contrast, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-overexpressing subtype had higher 18F-FDG uptake than the other 3 subtypes. There were 8 breast cancer lesions with higher 18F-alfatide II uptake than 18F-FDG uptake, which all had a common characteristic that HER-2 expression was negative and estrogen receptor expression was strongly positive. Conclusion: 18F-alfatide II is suitable for clinical use in breast cancer patients. 18F-alfatide II is of good performance, but not superior to 18F-FDG in identifying breast cancer. 18F-alfatide II may have superiority to 18F-FDG in detecting breast cancer with strongly positive estrogen receptor expression and negative HER-2 expression.

Project description:Combined whole-body dual-tracer ((18)F-FDG and (11)C-acetate) PET/CT is increasingly used for staging hepatocellular carcinoma, with only limited studies investigating the radiation dosimetry data of these scans. The aim of the study was to characterize the radiation dosimetry of combined whole-body dual-tracer PET/CT protocols.Consecutive adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent whole-body dual-tracer PET/CT scans were retrospectively reviewed with institutional review board approval. OLINDA/EXM 1.1 was used to estimate patient-specific internal dose exposure in each organ. Biokinetic models for (18)F-FDG and (11)C-acetate as provided by ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) publication 106 were used. Standard reference phantoms were modified to more closely represent patient-specific organ mass. With patient-specific parameters, organ equivalent doses from each CT series were estimated using VirtualDose. Dosimetry capabilities for tube current modulation protocols were applied by integrating with the latest anatomic realistic models. Effective dose was calculated using ICRP publication 103 tissue-weighting coefficients for adult male and female, respectively.Fourteen scans were evaluated (12 men, 2 women; mean age ± SD, 60 ± 19.48 y). The patient-specific effective dose from (18)F-FDG and (11)C-acetate was 6.08 ± 1.49 and 1.56 ± 0.47 mSv, respectively, for male patients and 6.62 ± 1.38 and 1.79 ± 0.12 mSV, respectively, for female patients. The patient-specific effective dose of the CT component, which comprised 2 noncontrast whole-body scans, to male and female patients was 21.20 ± 8.94 and 14.79 ± 3.35 mSv, respectively. Thus, the total effective doses of the combined whole-body dual-tracer PET/CT studies for male and female patients were 28.84 ± 10.18 and 23.19 ± 4.61 mSv, respectively.Patient-specific parameters allow for more accurate estimation of organ equivalent doses. Considering the substantial radiation dose incurred, judicious medical justification is required with every whole-body dual-tracer PET/CT referral. Although radiation risks may have less impact for the population with cancer because of their reduced life expectancy, the information is of interest and relevant for both justification, to evaluate risk/benefit, and protocol optimization.

Project description:PurposeEfforts have been made both to avoid invasive blood sampling and to shorten the scan duration for dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. A total-body scanner, such as the uEXPLORER PET/CT, can relieve these challenges through the following features: First, the whole-body coverage allows for noninvasive input function from the aortic arteries; second, with a dramatic increase in sensitivity, image quality can still be maintained at a high level even with a shorter scan duration than usual. We implemented a dual-time-window (DTW) protocol for a dynamic total-body 18F-FDG PET scan to obtain multiple kinetic parameters. The DTW protocol was then compared to several other simplified quantification methods for total-body FDG imaging that were proposed for conventional setup.MethodsThe research included 28 patient scans performed on an uEXPLORER PET/CT. By discarding the corresponding data in the middle of the existing full 60-min dynamic scan, the DTW protocol was simulated. Nonlinear fitting was used to estimate the missing data in the interval. The full input function was obtained from 15 subjects using a hybrid approach with a population-based image-derived input function. Quantification was carried out in three areas: the cerebral cortex, muscle, and tumor lesion. Micro- and macro-kinetic parameters for different scan durations were estimated by assuming an irreversible two-tissue compartment model. The visual performance of parametric images and region of interest-based quantification in several parameters were evaluated. Furthermore, simplified quantification methods (DTW, Patlak, fractional uptake ratio [FUR], and standardized uptake value [SUV]) were compared for similarity to the reference net influx rate Ki.ResultsKi and K1 derived from the DTW protocol showed overall good consistency (P < 0.01) with the reference from the 60-min dynamic scan with 10-min early scan and 5-min late scan (Ki correlation: 0.971, 0.990, and 0.990; K1 correlation: 0.820, 0.940, and 0.975 in the cerebral cortex, muscle, and tumor lesion, respectively). Similar correlationss were found for other micro-parameters. The DTW protocol had the lowest bias relative to standard Ki than any of the quantification methods, followed by FUR and Patlak. SUV had the weakest correlation with Ki. The whole-body Ki and K1 images generated by the DTW protocol were consistent with the reference parametric images.ConclusionsUsing the DTW protocol, the dynamic total-body FDG scan time can be reduced to 15 min while obtaining accurate Ki and K1 quantification and acceptable visual performance in parametric images. However, the trade-off between quantification accuracy and protocol implementation feasibility must be considered in practice. We recommend that the DTW protocol be used when the clinical task requires reliable visual assessment or quantifying multiple micro-parameters; FUR with a hybrid input function may be a more feasible approach to quantifying regional metabolic rate with a known lesion position or organs of interest.

Dataset Information

(18)F-alfatide II and (18)F-FDG dual-tracer dynamic PET for parametric, early prediction of tumor response to therapy.

Publications

(18)F-alfatide II and (18)F-FDG dual-tracer dynamic PET for parametric, early prediction of tumor response to therapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets