Unknown

Dataset Information

0

18F-Alfatide II PET/CT for Identification of Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Clinical Study.


ABSTRACT: 18F-alfatide II has been proven to have excellent clinical translational potential. In this study, we investigated 18F-alfatide II for identifying breast cancer and compared the performances between 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG. Methods: Forty-four female patients with suspected primary breast cancer were recruited. PET/CT images using 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG were acquired within 7 d. Tracer uptake in breast lesions was evaluated by visual analysis, and semiquantitative analysis with SUVmax and SUVmean Results: Forty-two breast cancer lesions and 11 benign breast lesions were confirmed by histopathology in 44 patients. Both 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG had higher uptake in breast cancer lesions than in benign breast lesions (P < 0.05 for 18F-alfatide II, P < 0.05 for 18F-FDG). The area under the curve of 18F-alfatide II was slightly less than that of 18F-FDG. Both 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG had high sensitivity (88.1% vs. 90.5%), high positive predictive value (88.1% vs. 88.4%), moderate specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%), and moderate negative predictive value (54.5% vs. 60.0%) for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast lesions. By combining 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG, the sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly increased to 97.6% and 85.7%, respectively, with positive predictive value slightly increased to 89.1% and no change to the specificity (54.5%). The uptake of 18F-alfatide II (SUVmax: 3.77 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than that of 18F-FDG (SUVmax: 7.37 ± 4.48) in breast cancer lesions (P < 0.05). 18F-alfatide II uptake in triple-negative subtype was significantly lower than that in luminal A and luminal B subtypes. By contrast, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-overexpressing subtype had higher 18F-FDG uptake than the other 3 subtypes. There were 8 breast cancer lesions with higher 18F-alfatide II uptake than 18F-FDG uptake, which all had a common characteristic that HER-2 expression was negative and estrogen receptor expression was strongly positive. Conclusion: 18F-alfatide II is suitable for clinical use in breast cancer patients. 18F-alfatide II is of good performance, but not superior to 18F-FDG in identifying breast cancer. 18F-alfatide II may have superiority to 18F-FDG in detecting breast cancer with strongly positive estrogen receptor expression and negative HER-2 expression.

SUBMITTER: Wu J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6910641 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

<sup>18</sup>F-Alfatide II PET/CT for Identification of Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Clinical Study.

Wu Jiang J   Wang Shaohua S   Zhang Xianzhong X   Teng Zhaogang Z   Wang Jingjie J   Yung Bryant C BC   Niu Gang G   Zhu Hong H   Lu Guangming G   Chen Xiaoyuan X  

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 20180426 12


<sup>18</sup>F-alfatide II has been proven to have excellent clinical translational potential. In this study, we investigated <sup>18</sup>F-alfatide II for identifying breast cancer and compared the performances between <sup>18</sup>F-alfatide II and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG. <b>Methods:</b> Forty-four female patients with suspected primary breast cancer were recruited. PET/CT images using <sup>18</sup>F-alfatide II and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG were acquired within 7 d. Tracer uptake in breast lesions was  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4626365 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10378166 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5954705 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6970046 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7363052 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5529439 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8458550 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10071809 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8049349 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9931817 | biostudies-literature