Dataset Information

Multi-level modelling of longitudinal child growth data from the Birth-to-Twenty Cohort: a comparison of growth models.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Different structural and non-structural models have been used to describe human growth patterns. However, few studies have compared the fitness of these models in an African transitioning population.

Aim

To find model(s) that best describe the growth pattern from birth to early childhood using mixed effect modelling.

Subjects and methods

The study compared the fitness of four structural (Berkey-Reed, Count, Jenss-Bayley and the adapted Jenss-Bayley) and two non-structural (2nd and 3rd order Polynomial) models. The models were fitted to physical growth data from an urban African setting from birth to 10 years using a multi-level modelling technique. The goodness-of-fit of the models was examined using median and maximum absolute residuals, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC).

Results

There were variations in how the different models fitted to the data at different measurement occasions. The Jenss-Bayley and the polynomial models did not fit well to growth measurements in the early years, with very high or very low percentage of positive residuals. The Berkey-Reed model fitted consistently well over the study period.

Conclusion

The Berkey-Reed model, previously used and fitted well to infancy growth data, has been shown to also fit well beyond infancy into childhood.

SUBMITTER: Chirwa ED

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4219852 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLongitudinal studies are important to understand patterns of growth in children and limited in India. It is important to identify an approach for characterising growth trajectories to distinguish between children who have healthy growth and those growth is poor. Many statistical approaches are available to assess the longitudinal growth data and which are difficult to recognize the pattern. In this research study, we employed functional principal component analysis (FPCA) as a statistical method to find the pattern of growth data. The purpose of this study is to describe the longitudinal child growth trajectory pattern under 3 years of age using functional principal component method.MethodsChildren born between March 2002 and August 2003 (n = 290) were followed until their third birthday in three neighbouring slums in Vellore, South India. Field workers visited homes to collect details of morbidity twice a week. Height and weight were measured monthly from 1 month of age in a study-run clinic. Longitudinal child growth trajectory pattern were extracted using Functional Principal Component analysis using B-spline basis functions with smoothing parameters. Functional linear model was used to assess the factors association with the growth functions.ResultsWe have obtained four FPCs explained by 86.5, 3.9, 3.1 and 2.2% of the variation respectively for the height functions. For height, 38% of the children's had poor growth trajectories. Similarly, three FPCs explained 76.2, 8.8, and 4.7% respectively for the weight functions and 44% of the children's had poor growth in their weight trajectories. Results show that gender, socio-economic status, parent's education, breast feeding, and gravida are associated and, influence the growth pattern in children.ConclusionsThe FPC approach deals with subjects' dynamics of growth and not with specific values at given times. FPC could be a better alternate approach for both dimension reduction and pattern detection. FPC may be used to offer greater insight for classification.

Project description:Overdispersion is a common feature of models of biological data, but researchers often fail to model the excess variation driving the overdispersion, resulting in biased parameter estimates and standard errors. Quantifying and modeling overdispersion when it is present is therefore critical for robust biological inference. One means to account for overdispersion is to add an observation-level random effect (OLRE) to a model, where each data point receives a unique level of a random effect that can absorb the extra-parametric variation in the data. Although some studies have investigated the utility of OLRE to model overdispersion in Poisson count data, studies doing so for Binomial proportion data are scarce. Here I use a simulation approach to investigate the ability of both OLRE models and Beta-Binomial models to recover unbiased parameter estimates in mixed effects models of Binomial data under various degrees of overdispersion. In addition, as ecologists often fit random intercept terms to models when the random effect sample size is low (<5 levels), I investigate the performance of both model types under a range of random effect sample sizes when overdispersion is present. Simulation results revealed that the efficacy of OLRE depends on the process that generated the overdispersion; OLRE failed to cope with overdispersion generated from a Beta-Binomial mixture model, leading to biased slope and intercept estimates, but performed well for overdispersion generated by adding random noise to the linear predictor. Comparison of parameter estimates from an OLRE model with those from its corresponding Beta-Binomial model readily identified when OLRE were performing poorly due to disagreement between effect sizes, and this strategy should be employed whenever OLRE are used for Binomial data to assess their reliability. Beta-Binomial models performed well across all contexts, but showed a tendency to underestimate effect sizes when modelling non-Beta-Binomial data. Finally, both OLRE and Beta-Binomial models performed poorly when models contained <5 levels of the random intercept term, especially for estimating variance components, and this effect appeared independent of total sample size. These results suggest that OLRE are a useful tool for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data, but that they do not perform well in all circumstances and researchers should take care to verify the robustness of parameter estimates of OLRE models.