Dataset Information

Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?

ABSTRACT: Next generation sequencing (NGS) coupled with sophisticated bioinformatics tools yields an unprecedented amount of information regarding tumor genetics, with the potential to reveal insights into tumor behavior. NGS and other multiplex genomic assays are rapidly spilling from the laboratory into the clinic through numerous commercial and academic entities. This raises the important question as to whether we are ready to use these data in clinical decision-making. While genetic lesions are clearly targeted by a new generation of biological cancer therapies, and certain regulatory approvals are actually coupled to single gene assays, we still do not know if the vast information on other genomic alterations is worth the added cost, or even worse, the inappropriate and unproven assignment of patients to treatment with an unapproved drug carrying potentially serious side effects. On the other hand, the trend toward a precision medicine pathway is clearly accelerating, and clinical trials validating pathway-driven personalized cancer therapeutics will be necessary in both the community and academic settings. Lower cost and wider availability of NGS now raises a debate over the merit of routine tumor genome-wide analysis.

SUBMITTER: Tripathy D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4244054 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?

Tripathy Debu D Harnden Kathleen K Blackwell Kimberly K Robson Mark M

BMC medicine 20140812

Next generation sequencing (NGS) coupled with sophisticated bioinformatics tools yields an unprecedented amount of information regarding tumor genetics, with the potential to reveal insights into tumor behavior. NGS and other multiplex genomic assays are rapidly spilling from the laboratory into the clinic through numerous commercial and academic entities. This raises the important question as to whether we are ready to use these data in clinical decision-making. While genetic lesions are clearl ...[more]

PMID: 25286031

Similar Datasets

Project description:Molecular technologies have allowed laboratories to detect and establish the profiles of human cancers by identifying a variety of somatic variants. In order to improve personalized patient care, we have established a next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to screen for somatic variants in primary or advanced cancers. In this study, we describe the laboratory quality management program for NGS testing, and also provide an overview of the somatic variants identified in over 1000 patient samples as well as their implications in clinical practice.Over the past one-and-a-half years, our laboratory received a total of 1028 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which consisted of non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), colon adenocarcinomas, glioma/glioblastomas, melanomas, breast carcinomas, and other tumor types. During this time period, we implemented a series of quality control (QC) checks that included (1) pre-DNA extraction, (2) DNA quantification, (3) DNA quality, (4) library quantification, (5) post-emulsification PCR, and (6) post-sequencing metrics. At least 10 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA) were used to prepare barcoded libraries using the AmpliSeq CHPv2. Samples were multiplexed and sequenced on Ion Torrent 318 chips using the Ion PGM System. Variants were identified using the Variant Caller Plugin, and annotation and functional predictions were performed using the Golden Helix SVS.A total of 1005 samples passed QC1-3, and following additional library preparation QC checkpoints, 877 samples were sequenced. Samples were classified into two categories: wild-type (127) and positive for somatic variants (750). Somatic variants were classified into clinically actionable (60%) and non-actionable (40%).The use of NGS in routine clinical laboratory practice allowed for the detection of tumor profiles that are essential for the selection of targeted therapies and identification of applicable clinical trials, contributing to the improvement of personalized patient care in oncology.

Project description:PurposeThe demand for high-throughput genetic profiling of somatic mutations in cancer tissues is growing. We sought to establish a targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panel test for clinical oncology practice.MethodsCustomized probes were designed to capture exonic regions of 141 genes selected for the panel, which was aimed for the detection of clinically actionable genetic variations in cancer, including KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, ALK, ROS1, KIT and EGFR. The size of entire targeted regions is 0.8 Mb. Library preparation used NEBNext Ultra II FS kit coupled with target enrichment. Paired-end sequencing was run on Illumina NextSeq 500 at a read length of 150 nt. A bioinformatics workflow focusing on single nucleotide variant and short insertions and deletions (SNV/indel) discovery was established using open source, in-house and commercial software tools. Standard reference DNA samples were used in testing the sensitivity and precision and limit of detection in variant calling.ResultsThe general performance of the panel was observed in pilot runs. Average total reads per sample ranged from 30 million to 48 million, 73% ~82% unique reads. All runs had more than 99% average mapping rate. Mean target coverage ranged from 727x to 879x. Depth of coverage at 50x or more reached 87% of targeted region and 60% of targeted region received 500x or more coverage depth. Using OncoSpan HD827 DNA, which bears 144 variants (SNV/indel) from 80 genes that are within the targeted region on the panel, our somatic variant calling pipeline reached 97% sensitivity and 100% precision respectively, with near 48 million reads. High concordance with orthogonal approaches in variant detection was further verified with 7 cancer cell lines and 45 clinical specimens.ConclusionWe developed a NGS panel with a focus on clinically actionable gene mutations and validated the performance in library construction, sequencing and variant calling. High concordance with reference materials and orthogonal mutation detection was observed.

Project description:The present study aimed to determine genomic changes in sporadic intracranial hemangioblastoma (HBL), and the mutation patterns were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). In this NGS analysis of the HBL tumor, 67 variants of 41 genes were identified. Of these, 64 were single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), two were exonic insertions and deletions (INDEL), and one was an intronic INDEL. In total, 15 were missense exonic variants, including an insertion variant in the NRAS gene, c.1_2insA, and a deletion variant, c.745delT, in the HNF1A gene, both of these mutations produced a termination codon. Other exonic missense variants found in the tumor were CTNNB1, FGFR3, KDR, SMO, HRAS, RAI1, and a TP53 variant (c.430C>G). Moreover, the results of the present study revealed a novel variant, c.430C>G, in TP53 and two missense variants of SND1 (c.1810G>C and c.1814G>C), which were also novel. ALK (rs760315884) and FGFR2 (rs1042522) missense variants were reported previously. Notably, a total of 10 previously reported single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found in this tumor in genes including MLH1 (rs769364808), FGFR3 (rs769364808), two variants (rs1873778 and rs2228230) in PDGFRA, KIT (rs55986963), APC (rs41115), and RET (rs1800861). The results of this study revealed a synonymous mutation (SNP) in c.1104 G>T; p. (Ser368Ser) in the MLH1 gene. In this amino acid (AA) codon, two other variants are also known to cause missense substitutions, c.1103C>G; p. (Ser368Trp); COSM6986674) and c.1103C>T; p.(Ser368Leu; COSM3915870), were found in hematopoietic and urinary tract tissue, respectively. However, three SNPs found in genes such as ALK, KDR, and ABL1 in the HBL tumor in this study were not reported in UCSC, COSMIC, and ClinVar databases. Additionally, 19 intronic variants were identified in this tumor. One intronic SNV was present in each of the following genes: EGFR, ERBB4, KDR, SMO, CDKN2B, PTEN, PTPN11, RB1, AKT1, and ERBB2. In PIK3CA and FBXL18 genes, two intronic variants were present, and in the SND1 gene, three intronic variants were detected in the HBL tumor presented in this study. Notably, only one of these was reported in the catalog of somatic mutations in cancer. Only one 3'-untranslated region (UTR) insertion variant in the NRAS gene (c.*2010T>AT) was detected in the tumor of the present study, and this was a splice site acceptor. A TP53 intronic mutation (c.782+1G>T) was the only pathogenic splice_donor_variant found in this HBL tumor. The frequency of variants and Phred scores were markedly high, and the p-values were significant for all of the aforementioned mutations. In summary, a total of 15 missense, 10 synonymous, and 19 intronic variants were identified in the HBL tumor. Results of the present study detected one novel insertion in NRAS and one novel deletion in HNF1A genes, a novel missense variant in the TP53 gene, and two novel missense variants of SND1. Hotspot mutations in other cancer driver genes, such as PTEN, ATM, SMAD4, SMARCB1, STK11, NPM1, CDKN2A, and EGFR, which are frequently affected in gliomas, were not found in the tumor of the present study. Future studies should aim to validate oncogenic mutations that may act as novel targets for the treatment of these tumors.

Project description:Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used for clinical evaluation of patients presenting with thrombotic microangiopathies because it allows for simultaneous interrogation of multiple complement and coagulation pathway genes known to be associated with disease. However, the diagnostic yield is undefined in routine clinical practice. Historic studies relied on case-control cohorts, did not apply current guidelines for variant pathogenicity assessment, and used targeted gene enrichment combined with next-generation sequencing. A clinically enhanced exome, targeting ~54?Mb, was sequenced for 73 patients. Variant analysis and interpretation were performed on genes with biological relevance in thrombotic microangiopathy (C3,CD46, CFB, CFH, CFI, DGKE, and THBD). CFHR3-CFHR1 deletion status was also assessed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Variants were classified using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. We identified 5 unique novel and 14 unique rare variants in 25% (18/73) of patients, including a total of 5 pathogenic, 4 likely pathogenic, and 15 variants of uncertain clinical significance. Nine patients had homozygous deletions in CFHR3-CFHR1. The diagnostic yield, defined as the presence of a pathogenic variant, likely pathogenic variant or homozygous deletion of CFHR3-CFHR1, was 25% for all patients tested. Variants of uncertain clinical significance were identified in 21% (15/73) of patients.These results illustrate the expected diagnositic yield in the setting of thrombotic microangiopathies through the application of standardized variant interpretation, and highlight the utility of such an approach. Sequencing a clinically enhanced exome to enable targeted, disease-specific variant analysis is a viable approach. The moderate rate of variants of uncertain clinical significance highlights the paucity of data surrounding the variants in our cohort and illustrates the need for expanded variant curation resources to aid in thrombotic microangiopathy-related disease variant classification.

Dataset Information

Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?

Publications

Next generation sequencing and tumor mutation profiling: are we ready for routine use in the oncology clinic?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets