Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cashing out: The decisional flexibility of uncertainty responses in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).


ABSTRACT: Researchers are exploring whether animals share with humans something like a metacognitive capacity. Though some results point to human-animal continuities in this domain, they face the dominant criticism that animals' performances might be associative. A persistent problem is that animal-metacognition paradigms present static environments of risk and reward that may foster inflexible and conditioned responding. Those environments do not challenge animals to show the flexibility in their decision strategies that could indicate an antecedent capacity to metacognition. Accordingly, we tested macaques and humans on an uncertainty-monitoring paradigm in which risk changed dynamically. Participants classified stimuli of different difficulties while also choosing when to use a cashout response to collect the accumulated rewards that would be forfeit on a discrimination error. Macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans flexibly adjusted their decision criteria to achieve appropriate protection against the cost of error that could differ depending on trial difficulty and the number of rewards at risk. In particular, monkeys widened their cashout-response region as their accumulated rewards increased, providing more protection against a more costly error. These findings demonstrate a new continuity between humans' and animals' uncertainty systems. They reveal a calibration by macaques of present risk to trial difficulty tolerated. They show that animals' uncertainty-monitoring and risk-management systems have substantial trial-by-trial flexibility.

SUBMITTER: Zakrzewski AC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4280665 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cashing out: The decisional flexibility of uncertainty responses in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Zakrzewski Alexandria C AC   Perdue Bonnie M BM   Beran Michael J MJ   Church Barbara A BA   Smith J David JD  

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition 20140811 4


Researchers are exploring whether animals share with humans something like a metacognitive capacity. Though some results point to human-animal continuities in this domain, they face the dominant criticism that animals' performances might be associative. A persistent problem is that animal-metacognition paradigms present static environments of risk and reward that may foster inflexible and conditioned responding. Those environments do not challenge animals to show the flexibility in their decisio  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5814353 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3046777 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8647760 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6526489 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6855672 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3236225 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8277898 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5510871 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3141668 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2920293 | biostudies-literature