Dataset Information

A randomized study of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

ABSTRACT: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lubiprostone for relieving symptoms of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain.Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Seventy-nine US and Canadian centers.Patients aged ? 18 years with OIC, defined as <3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week.Patients received lubiprostone 24 mcg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in SBM frequency at week 8.Among randomized patients (N=418; lubiprostone, N=210; placebo, N=208), most completed the study (lubiprostone, 67.1%; placebo, 69.7%). The safety and efficacy (intent-to-treat) populations included 414 (lubiprostone, N=208; placebo, N=206) and 413 (lubiprostone, N=209; placebo, N=204) patients, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) age was 50.4 (10.9) years; most patients were female (64.4%) and white (77.7%). Changes from baseline in SBM frequency rates were significantly higher at week 8 (P=0.005) and overall (P=0.004) in patients treated with lubiprostone compared with placebo. Pairwise comparisons showed significantly greater overall improvement for abdominal discomfort (P=0.047), straining (P<0.001), constipation severity (P=0.007), and stool consistency (P<0.001) with lubiprostone compared with placebo. Moreover, patients rated the effectiveness of lubiprostone as significantly (P<0.05) better than placebo for 11 of 12 weeks. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with lubiprostone and placebo were nausea (16.8% vs 5.8%, respectively), diarrhea (9.6% vs 2.9%), and abdominal distention (8.2% vs 2.4%). No lubiprostone-related serious AEs occurred.Lubiprostone effectively relieved OIC and associated signs and symptoms and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00595946).

SUBMITTER: Cryer B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4282321 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A randomized study of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Cryer Byron B Katz Seymour S Vallejo Ricardo R Popescu Anca A Ueno Ryuji R

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) 20140409 11

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral lubiprostone for relieving symptoms of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic noncancer pain.<h4>Design</h4>Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Seventy-nine US and Canadian centers.<h4>Subjects</h4>Patients aged ≥ 18 years with OIC, defined as <3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients received lubiprostone 24 mcg or placebo twice daily for 12 ...[more]

PMID: 24716835

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThis multicenter, phase 3 trial evaluated oral lubiprostone for constipation associated with non-methadone opioids in patients with chronic noncancer-related pain.MethodsAdults with opioid-induced constipation (OIC; <3 spontaneous bowel movements [SBMs] per week) were randomized 1:1 to double-blind lubiprostone 24??g or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the overall SBM response rate. Responders had at least moderate response (?1 SBM improvement over baseline frequency) in all treatment weeks with available observed data, as well as full response (?3 SBMs per week) for at least 9 of the 12 treatment weeks.ResultsIn total, 431 patients were randomized; 212 each received lubiprostone and placebo, and 7 were not treated. Overall, the SBM response rate was significantly higher for patients treated with lubiprostone vs. placebo (27.1 vs. 18.9%, respectively; P=0.030). Overall mean change from baseline in SBM frequency was significantly greater with lubiprostone vs. placebo (3.2 vs. 2.4, respectively; P=0.001). The median time to first SBM was significantly shorter with lubiprostone vs. placebo (23.5 vs. 37.7?h, respectively; P=0.004). Compared with placebo, the patients treated with lubiprostone exhibited significant improvements in straining (P=0.004), stool consistency (P<0.001), and constipation severity (P=0.010). No significant differences were observed in quality-of-life measures or the use of rescue medication; however, the percentage of patients who used rescue medication was consistently lower in the lubiprostone group than in the placebo group at months 1 (34.9 vs. 37.7%), 2 (23.4 vs. 26.6%), and 3 (20.5 vs. 22.0%). Adverse events (AEs) >5% were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain (lubiprostone: 11.3, 9.9, 4.2, and 7.1%, respectively; placebo, 3.8, 4.7, 5.2, and 0%, respectively). None of the serious AEs (lubiprostone, 3.3%; placebo, 2.8%) were related to lubiprostone.ConclusionsLubiprostone significantly improved symptoms of OIC and was well tolerated in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Project description:Purpose:An oral formulation of methylnaltrexone has been developed for treating opioid-induced constipation (OIC). This manuscript examines the impact of oral methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, on opioid analgesia. Methods:This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated changes in pain intensity scores (0= no pain to 10= worst possible pain) and opioid use in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Patients taking ?50 mg/day oral morphine equivalent dose (MED) for ?14 days before screening with less than three rescue-free bowel movements/week received oral methylnaltrexone 150 mg/day (n=201), 300 mg/day (n=201), 450 mg/day (n=200), or placebo (n=201) once daily for 4 weeks followed by 8 weeks of oral methylnaltrexone as needed. Results:The primary condition requiring opioid use was back pain (68.2% of 803 patients). Baseline pain intensity scores were similar among treatment groups (mean range, 6.2-6.4) and remained stable throughout the 4-week double-blind (mean range, 6.1-6.5) and 8-week as needed (mean range, 6.3-6.5) periods. Baseline mean MED was comparable between oral methylnaltrexone 150 mg (200.0 mg/day), methylnaltrexone 450 mg (218.0 mg/day), and placebo (209.7 mg/day), but was slightly higher in the oral methylnaltrexone 300-mg group (252.6 mg/day). Nonsignificant, minimal changes in mean MED were observed after 4 weeks of treatment (214.5-235.6 mg/day) and at the end of the as needed phase (202.3-234.9 mg/day). The percentage of patients who initiated new opioid medications during the 4-week, once-daily dosing period was generally similar among the oral methylnaltrexone 150-mg, 300-mg, and 450-mg groups (44.8%, 43.3%, and 35.0%, respectively), the oral methylnaltrexone combined group (41.0%), and the placebo group (39.8%). The most common newly initiated opioid medications during this once-daily period were oxycodone (oral methylnaltrexone groups combined, 14.6%; placebo, 12.4%) and morphine (oral methylnaltrexone combined, 10.1%; placebo, 7.0%). Conclusion:Oral methylnaltrexone does not elicit opioid withdrawal or interfere with opioid analgesia.

Dataset Information

A randomized study of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Publications

A randomized study of lubiprostone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets