Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Strong effects of ionizing radiation from Chernobyl on mutation rates.


ABSTRACT: In this paper we use a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between radiation and mutation rates in Chernobyl across 45 published studies, covering 30 species. Overall effect size of radiation on mutation rates estimated as Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was very large (E = 0.67; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59 to 0.73), accounting for 44.3% of the total variance in an unstructured random-effects model. Fail-safe calculations reflecting the number of unpublished null results needed to eliminate this average effect size showed the extreme robustness of this finding (Rosenberg's method: 4135 at p = 0.05). Indirect tests did not provide any evidence of publication bias. The effect of radiation on mutations varied among taxa, with plants showing a larger effect than animals. Humans were shown to have intermediate sensitivity of mutations to radiation compared to other species. Effect size did not decrease over time, providing no evidence for an improvement in environmental conditions. The surprisingly high mean effect size suggests a strong impact of radioactive contamination on individual fitness in current and future generations, with potentially significant population-level consequences, even beyond the area contaminated with radioactive material.

SUBMITTER: Moller AP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4322348 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Strong effects of ionizing radiation from Chernobyl on mutation rates.

Møller Anders Pape AP   Mousseau Timothy A TA  

Scientific reports 20150210


In this paper we use a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between radiation and mutation rates in Chernobyl across 45 published studies, covering 30 species. Overall effect size of radiation on mutation rates estimated as Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was very large (E = 0.67; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59 to 0.73), accounting for 44.3% of the total variance in an unstructured random-effects model. Fail-safe calculations reflecting the number of unpublished null re  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5159907 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4792135 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3135598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6371805 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4389250 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7312565 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2412919 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6193964 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6890664 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4070951 | biostudies-literature