The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wong LF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC4346440 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss.
Wong Luchin F LF Schliep Karen C KC Silver Robert M RM Mumford Sunni L SL Perkins Neil J NJ Ye Aijun A Galai Noya N Wactawski-Wende Jean J Lynch Anne M AM Townsend Janet M JM Faraggi David D Schisterman Enrique F EF
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 20140920 3
<h4>Objective</h4>We sought to assess the relationship between a short interpregnancy interval (IPI) following a pregnancy loss and subsequent live birth and pregnancy outcomes.<h4>Study design</h4>A secondary analysis of women enrolled in the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial with a human chorionic gonadotropin-positive pregnancy test and whose last reproductive outcome was a loss were included in this analysis (n = 677). IPI was defined as the time between last pregnancy l ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:ImportanceInterpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months are associated with higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. It is currently unknown whether short intervals are associated with increased risks among older women to the same extent as among younger women.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the association between short interpregnancy (delivery to conception) interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes is modified by maternal age.Design, setting, and participantsA population-based cohort study conducted in British Columbia, Canada, evaluated women with 2 or more singleton pregnancies from 2004 to 2014 with the first (index) pregnancy resulting in a live birth. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to July 20, 2018.Main outcomes and measuresRisks of maternal mortality or severe morbidity (eg, mechanical ventilation, blood transfusion >3 U, intensive care unit admission, organ failure, death), small-for-gestational age (<10th birthweight percentile for gestational age and sex), fetal and infant composite outcome (stillbirth, infant death, <third birthweight percentile for gestational age and sex, delivery <28 weeks), and spontaneous and indicated preterm delivery. Risks of each outcome for 3- to 24-month interpregnancy intervals were estimated, according to maternal age at index birth (20-34 and ≥35 years). Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) comparing predicted risks at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month intervals with risks at 18-month intervals for each age group were calculated. The potential role of other factors explaining any differences (unmeasured confounding) was examined in several sensitivity analyses.ResultsAmong 148 544 pregnancies, maternal mortality or severe morbidity risks were increased at 6-month compared with 18-month interpregnancy intervals for women aged 35 years or older (0.62% at 6 months vs 0.26% at 18 months; aRR, 2.39; 95% CI, 2.03-2.80), but not for women aged 20 to 34 years (0.23% at 6 months vs 0.25% at 18 months; aRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.02). Increased adverse fetal and infant outcome risks were more pronounced for women aged 20 to 34 years (2.0% at 6 months vs 1.4% at 18 months; aRR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.36-1.47) than women 35 years or older (2.1% at 6 months vs 1.8% at 18 months; aRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31). Risks of spontaneous preterm delivery at 6-month interpregnancy intervals were increased for women 20 to 34 years old (5.3% at 6 months vs 3.2% at 18 months; aRR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.62-1.68) and to a lesser extent for women 35 years or older (5.0% at 6 months vs 3.6% at 18 months; aRR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.31-1.49). Modest increases in risks of small-for-gestational age and indicated preterm delivery at short intervals did not vary meaningfully by maternal age. Sensitivity analyses suggested that observed associations were not fully explained by unmeasured confounding.Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this study suggest that short interpregnancy intervals are associated with increased risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes for women of all ages.
| S-EPMC6583597 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate whether intervening miscarriages and induced abortions impact the associations between interpregnancy interval after a live birth and adverse pregnancy outcomes.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingNorway.ParticipantsA total of 165 617 births to 143 916 women between 2008 and 2016.Main outcome measuresWe estimated adjusted relative risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes using log-binomial regression, first ignoring miscarriages and induced abortions in the interpregnancy interval estimation (conventional interpregnancy interval estimates) and subsequently accounting for intervening miscarriages or induced abortions (correct interpregnancy interval estimates). We then calculated the ratio of the two relative risks (ratio of ratios, RoR) as a measure of the difference.ResultsThe proportion of short interpregnancy interval (<6 months) was 4.0% in the conventional interpregnancy interval estimate and slightly increased to 4.6% in the correct interpregnancy interval estimate. For interpregnancy interval <6 months, compared with 18-23 months, the RoR was 0.97 for preterm birth (PTB) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-1.13), 0.97 for spontaneous PTB ( 95% CI 0.80-1.19), 1.00 for small-for-gestational age ( 95% CI 0.86-1.14), 1.00 for large-for-gestational age (95% CI 0.90-1.10) and 0.99 for pre-eclampsia (95% CI 0.71-1.37). Similarly, conventional and correct interpregnancy intervals yielded associations of similar magnitude between long interpregnancy interval (≥60 months) and the pregnancy outcomes evaluated.ConclusionNot considering intervening pregnancy loss due to miscarriages or induced abortions, results in negligible difference in the associations between short and long interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Tweetable abstractNot considering pregnancy loss in interpregnancy interval estimation resulted no meaningful differences in observed risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
| S-EPMC9541236 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Previous studies have demonstrated that short interpregnancy interval (the interval between delivery and estimated last menstrual period of a subsequent pregnancy) is associated with small for gestational age birth. It is controversial if this association is causal, as few studies have accounted for likely confounding factors such as unintended pregnancy. We examined the association between interpregnancy interval and infant birthweight, adjusting for pregnancy intention and other socio-economic and obstetrical risk factors. METHODS:We used data from the Scandinavian Successive Small-for-Gestational-Age births study (1986-1988). Birthweight was expressed as a gestational age-standardised z-score. RESULTS:Among 1406 women, a trend towards lower birthweight z-score with short interpregnancy interval was not statistically significant (unadjusted difference in birthweight z-score of -0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.55, 0.05). After adjusting for pregnancy intention, detailed measures of socio-economic status, and other covariates, the estimated magnitude of effect between interpregnancy interval and birthweight z-score was further attenuated (adjusted difference in birthweight z-score of -0.13, 95% CI -0.46, 0.20). CONCLUSIONS:In this cohort study with detailed information on pregnancy intention and socio-economic status, short interpregnancy interval was not associated with lower birthweight. These findings suggest that previously observed associations between short interpregnancy interval and lower birthweight may reflect confounding by socio-economic and/or other unmeasured confounders.
| S-EPMC6378596 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundThe World Health Organization recommends to wait at least 6 months after miscarriage and induced abortion before becoming pregnant again to avoid complications in the next pregnancy, although the evidence-based underlying this recommendation is scarce. We aimed to investigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes-preterm birth (PTB), spontaneous PTB, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, large for gestational age (LGA) birth, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-by interpregnancy interval (IPI) for births following a previous miscarriage or induced abortion.Methods and findingsWe conducted a cohort study using a total of 49,058 births following a previous miscarriage and 23,707 births following a previous induced abortion in Norway between 2008 and 2016. We modeled the relationship between IPI and 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes separately for births after miscarriages and births after induced abortions. We used log-binomial regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the adjusted model, we included maternal age, gravidity, and year of birth measured at the time of the index (after interval) births. In a sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for smoking during pregnancy and prepregnancy body mass index. Compared to births with an IPI of 6 to 11 months after miscarriages (10.1%), there were lower risks of SGA births among births with an IPI of <3 months (8.6%) (aRR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.92, p < 0.01) and 3 to 5 months (9.0%) (aRR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.97, p = 0.01). An IPI of <3 months after a miscarriage (3.3%) was also associated with lower risk of GDM (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p = 0.01) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%). For births following an induced abortion, an IPI <3 months (11.5%) was associated with a nonsignificant but increased risk of SGA (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.36, p = 0.07) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (10.0%), while the risk of LGA was lower among those with an IPI 3 to 5 months (8.0%) (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.98, p = 0.03) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (9.4%). There was no observed association between adverse pregnancy outcomes with an IPI >12 months after either a miscarriage or induced abortion (p > 0.05), with the exception of an increased risk of GDM among women with an IPI of 12 to 17 months (5.8%) (aRR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.40, p = 0.02), 18 to 23 months (6.2%) (aRR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.50, p = 0.03), and ≥24 months (6.4%) (aRR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.34, p = 0.10) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%) after a miscarriage. Inherent to retrospective registry-based studies, we did not have information on potential confounders such as pregnancy intention and health-seeking bahaviour. Furthermore, we only had information on miscarriages that resulted in contact with the healthcare system.ConclusionsOur study suggests that conceiving within 3 months after a miscarriage or an induced abortion is not associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In combination with previous research, these results suggest that women could attempt pregnancy soon after a previous miscarriage or induced abortion without increasing perinatal health risks.
| S-EPMC9681073 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceMany studies have reported an association of interpregnancy interval (IPI) between 2 consecutive births with adverse birth outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. However, most of these studies ignore the implications of some unmeasured confounders.ObjectiveTo explore the association of IPI with adverse perinatal outcomes.Design, setting, and participantsThis large-scale cohort study used the Guangdong Provincial Women and Children Health Information System in Guangdong Province, China, to obtain birth data recorded between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. Matched-sibling design was used. The final cohort included first-born and second-born sibling pairs delivered by mothers who were permanent residents of Guangdong Province.ExposuresThe exposure variable was IPI, which was categorized as follows: less than 6, 6 to 11, 12 to 17, 18 to 23, 24 to 29, 30 to 35, and 36 or more months.Main outcomes and measuresThe outcome variables were adverse birth outcomes: preterm birth (PTB, gestational age <37 weeks), low birth weight (LBW, <2500 g), and small for gestational age (SGA). Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and interaction odds ratio (IOR) associated with IPI were calculated.ResultsThe study consisted of 725 392 sibling pairs of multiparous mothers. Among these mothers, 718 111 (99.0%) were aged 20 to 34 years, and 715 583 (98.7%) were of Han Chinese ethnicity. Unmatched analysis showed that a short IPI of less than 6 months was associated with higher risks of PTB (adjusted OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.87-2.06), LBW (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.79-1.98), and SGA (adjusted OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.30-1.38) compared with an IPI of 18 to 23 months. These associations were attenuated in the matched-sibling analysis. An association of short IPI (<6 months) with PTB (adjusted IOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.30-1.51), LBW (adjusted IOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.21-1.40), and SGA (adjusted IOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22) remained in the matched analysis. For IPI of 36 months or more, the odds of PTB (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14) and LBW (adjusted OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19) in the unmatched analysis were also greater than the reference interval (18-23 months), but not for SGA (adjusted OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99). Associations between a long IPI (≥36 months) and PTB (adjusted IOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19) and LBW (adjusted IOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.26) remained through the sibling comparisons.Conclusions and relevanceResults of this study indicated that mothers with a short (<6 months) or long (≥36 months) IPI had greater odds of adverse birth outcomes. The findings may inform family planning policies and guide individuals and families who are planning for another pregnancy in China.
| S-EPMC9194661 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A short interpregnancy interval (IPI) is a risk factor for preterm delivery among women of reproductive age. As limited data exist concerning adolescents, we aimed to examine the association between short IPIs and preterm birth among adolescents using a majority of US births. Using 2007-2008 US natality data, we assessed the relationship between IPIs <3, 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17 months and moderately (32-36 weeks) and very (<32 weeks) preterm singleton live births among mothers <20 years, relative to IPIs 18-23 months. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) adjusted for maternal race, age, previous preterm deliveries, marital status, smoking and prenatal care were determined from a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. In 2007-2008, there were 85,077 singleton live births to women aged <20 who had one previous live birth, 69 % of which followed IPIs ≤18 months. Compared with IPIs 18-23 months, short IPIs were associated with moderately preterm birth for IPIs <3 months (aOR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.70-2.10), 3-5 months (aOR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.22-1.47), and 6-12 months (aOR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.02-1.21). IPIs <3 and <6 months were also associated with very preterm birth, with aORs of 2.52 (95 % CI 1.98-3.22) and 1.68 (95 % CI 1.35-2.10) respectively. Many adolescent mothers with repeat births have short IPIs, and shorter IPIs are associated with preterm birth in a dose-dependent fashion. Increasing adolescent mothers' use of effective contraception postpartum can address both unintended adolescent births and preterm birth.
| S-EPMC5547434 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:Several studies have examined the association between IPI and birth outcomes, but few have explored the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and postnatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE:We examined the association between IPI and injury-related infant mortality, a leading cause of postneonatal mortality. METHODS:We used 2011-2015 US period-linked birth-infant death vital statistics data to generate a multiyear birth cohort of non-first-born singleton births (N = 9 782 029). IPI was defined as the number of months between a live birth and the start of the pregnancy leading to the next live birth. Causes of death in the first year of life were identified using ICD-10 codes. Hazard ratios (HR) for IPI categories were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for birth order, county poverty level, and maternal characteristics (marital status, race/ethnicity, education, age at previous birth). RESULTS:After adjustment, overall infant mortality (48.1 per 10 000 births) was higher for short and long IPIs compared with IPI 18-23 months (reference): <6, aHR 1.61, 95% CI 1.54, 1.68; 6-11, aHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17, 1.26; and 60+ months, aHR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08, 1.16. In comparison, the risk of injury-related infant mortality (4.4 per 10 000 births) decreased with longer IPIs: <6, aHR 1.77, 95% CI 1.55, 2.01; 6-11, aHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.25, 1.59; 12-17, aHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10, 1.41; 24-59, aHR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69, 0.87; and 60+ months, aHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48, 0.62. CONCLUSION:Unlike overall infant mortality, injury-related infant mortality decreased with IPI length. While injury-related deaths are rare, these patterns suggest that the timing between births may be a marker of risk for fatal infant injuries. The first year postpartum may be an ideal time for the delivery of evidence-based injury prevention programmes as well as family planning services.
| S-EPMC6913028 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To examine associations among interpregnancy interval, the duration from the preceding birth to the conception of the next-born index child, and adverse birth outcomes using designs that adjust for measured and unmeasured factors. METHODS:In this prospective cohort study, we used population-based Swedish registries from 1973 to 2009 to estimate the associations between interpregnancy interval (referent 18-23 months) and adverse birth outcomes (ie, preterm birth [less than 37 weeks of gestation], low birth weight [LBW; less than 2,500 g], small for gestational age [SGA; greater than 2 SDs below average weight for gestational age]). Analyses included cousin and sibling comparisons and postbirth intervals (ie, the interval between secondborn and thirdborn offspring predicting secondborn outcomes) to address unmeasured familial confounding. RESULTS:Traditional cohort-wide analyses showed higher odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 99% CI 1.39-1.63, 5.99% preterm births]) and LBW (adjusted OR 1.25, 99% CI 1.13-1.39, 3.32% LBW) after a short interpregnancy interval (0-5 months) compared with offspring born after an interpregnancy interval of 18-23 months (3.21% preterm births, 1.92% LBW). Except for preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.72, 99% CI 1.26-2.35), associations were attenuated in cousin comparisons. A small association between a short interpregnancy interval and preterm birth remained in sibling comparisons (adjusted OR 1.22, 99% CI 1.11-1.35), but associations with LBW (adjusted OR 0.83, 99% CI 0.74-0.94) and SGA (adjusted OR 0.74, 99% CI 0.64-0.85) reversed direction. For pregnancy intervals of 60 months or more, odds of preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.51, 99% CI 1.43-1.60, 5.07% preterm births), LBW (adjusted OR 1.61, 99% CI 1.50-1.73, 3.43% low-birth-weight births), and SGA (adjusted OR 1.54, 99% CI 1.42-1.66, 2.49% SGA births) were also higher when compared with the reference interval (1.53% SGA). Associations between long interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes remained through cousin and sibling comparisons. Postbirth interval analyses showed familial confounding is present for short interpregnancy intervals, but supported independent associations for long interpregnancy intervals. CONCLUSION:Familial confounding explains most of the association between a short interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes, whereas associations with long interpregnancy intervals were independent of measured and unmeasured factors.
| S-EPMC5783305 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a history of recurrent ectopic pregnancy (EP) on pregnancy outcomes of subsequent in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.MethodsA retrospective cohort study involving 457 women with a history of recurrent EP (REP group), 912 women with a history of single EP (SEP group), and 1169 women with a history of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP group) as the control group, was conducted. IVF outcomes were compared for each cohort.ResultsThe incidence of EP in the REP group after IVF treatment was significantly lower than those in the SEP group (2.4% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.011), and similar to those in the IUP group (2.4% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.830). No significant differences were observed in the clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate among the three groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrent EP rate between the salpingectomy and salpingostomy treatments. Adjusting for maternal and treatment factors did not influence live birth rates for women with previous REP compared with women with previous SEP and those with IUP. The odds of EP were 82.2% lower (OR 0.178, 95% CI 0.042-0.762; P = 0.020) in women who had blastocyst transfer compared with cleavage embryo transfer in the SEP group. The odds of EP were over six times (OR 6.260, 95% CI 1.255-31.220; P = 0.025) in women who underwent double embryo transfer as opposed to single embryo transfer in the IUP group.ConclusionOur results indicate that women with previous recurrent EP have a lower risk of EP after IVF in comparison with women with previous single EP. Previous EP has no significant adverse effect on the main IVF outcomes. The salpingostomy and salpingectomy treatments of EP do not significantly affect the incidence of recurrent EP after IVF.
| S-EPMC9377625 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To compare associations between interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) and adverse perinatal outcomes in deliveries following IVF with deliveries following spontaneous conception or other (non-IVF) fertility treatments. DESIGN:Cohort using linked birth certificate and assisted reproductive technology surveillance data from Massachusetts and Michigan. SETTING:Not applicable. PATIENT(S):1,225,718 deliveries. INTERVENTION(S):None. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S):We assessed associations between IPI and preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA) according to live birth or nonlive pregnancy outcome in the previous pregnancy. RESULT(S):In IVF deliveries following previous live birth, risk of PTB was 22.2% for IPI 12 to <24 months (reference); risk of PTB was higher for IPI <12 months (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41) and IPI ≥60 months (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.26). In non-IVF deliveries following live birth, risk of PTB was 6.4% for IPI 12 to <24 months (reference); risk of PTB was higher for IPI <12 and ≥60 months (aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.21, for both). In both populations, U-shaped or approximately U-shaped associations were observed for SGA and LBW, although the association of IPI <12 months and SGA was not significant in IVF deliveries. In IVF and non-IVF deliveries following nonlive pregnancy outcome, IPI <12 months was not associated with increased risk of PTB, LBW, or SGA, but IPI ≥60 months was associated with significant increased risk of those outcomes in non-IVF deliveries. CONCLUSION(S):Following live births, IPIs <12 or ≥60 months were associated with higher risks of most adverse perinatal outcomes in both IVF and non-IVF deliveries.
| S-EPMC6038145 | biostudies-other